Leach tries in vain to prove that Dodgson was not a paedophile by showing that what he did, taking photographs of prepubescent girls in the nude, was something normal during the Victorian era. I disagree. There were only a few perverted people who photographed little girls in the nude, and Dodgson was one of them. One cannot deny, no matter how much one tries proving otherwise. There is enough evidence available, even after documents and photographs have been destroyed, to show that nearly all of his photos were of `little girls' in the nude, and that he lost interest in them once they reached puberty.
Leach also tries to show that Alice Liddell was not the Alice of his Alice books. Again she is wrong, for there is enough internal evidence to prove otherwise. 1. Her birthday (4 May) is mentioned twice in the book `Alice's Adventures in Wonderland' - "I've seen hatters before," she said to herself; "the March Hare will be much the most interesting, and perhaps, as this is May, it won't be raving mad - at least not so mad as it was in March." and again The Hatter was the first to break the silence. "What day of the month is it?" he said, turning to Alice: he had taken his watch out of his pocket, and was looking at it uneasily ... Alice considered a little, and then said, "The fourth." 2. In the Mad Hatters Tea Party she is mentioned again "Once upon a time there were three little sisters," the Dormouse began in a great hurry; "and their names were Elsie, Lacie, and Tillie; and they lived at the bottom of a well ..." Lacie is an anagram of Alice. 3. The epilogue of `Through the Looking Glass' contain the twenty-one letters of Alice Pleasance Liddell. What other proof does one need?
Leach also tries hard to show that Dodgson was really interested in mature women, and not little girls, for she gives a list of adult female who were friends with Dodgson. That proves nothing, for again, there is enough proof to show that he was obsessed by prepubescent girls, and one cannot get away from the fact no matter how one tries. She goes one step further to show that Dodgson was in love with Lorina Liddell and dedicates a whole chapter `My Lady' to it. Again there is no proof only speculation.
She knocks the biographers of Dodgson calling their books fiction; but her book is filled with speculation, and there is not once ounce proven fact in the whole book. She has twisted things to suit her theories.