Whales began as a black bean in God's garden, bees were created by a demon jealous of God's creating, Hughes takes considerable licence with the creation myth. Relying upon Darwinism, Hughes imagines all ab initio, without recourse to traditional, Judaeo-Christian mythology. At times Hughes is as effective with his animals as Rudyard Kipling was in the Jungle Books: at other times, however, Hughes's animals inhabit a world redolent of a human society no one would want to live in. This is particularly apparent in the story, How the Tortoise Became. Tortoise in his becoming is bullied and 'bear-baited' unbearably by the other animals. One shudders at the society Hughes must have known: here preserved for posterity. Hughes's animals lack serenity, and one assumes that Hughes also lacked this quality. Comparisons with Kipling's Jungle Books need to be qualified.
Hughes portrays God as like a Greek or Roman god: humanized. Occasionally, however, God does live up to His Judaeo-Christian ancestry. The question arises, as in his children's books Hughes makes a bid for children's imaginations, that crucible of morality's concern, how seriously Hughes is to be taken. We know from Hughes's letters that Hughes was not religious (although in a late poem, "6 September 1997", Hughes embraces catholicism): in a letter to Aurelia Plath about his wife's suicide he writes that if there were an eternity he was damned in it but that he had no desire for forgiveness. In this children's book he propogates this agnosticism. Parents, perhaps, are to be warned. Are Hughes's 'agnostic' works for children merely literary curiosities or has Hughes grasped something more time-enduring (are we indeed emancipating ourselves from religion - more specifically, Judaeo-Christianity?)? Believers would surely opine that Hughes's unbelief is but a curiosity.