This was disappointing. It's interesting I suppose because he is not in the same spheres of thought as I am but it is irritating. De Bono says it would be predictable and therefore boring to call this book boring. I don't call it boring - there are enticing exciting insights, mainly revealed in the outline structure headings, the cover and in little moments of lyrical visionary expressiveness -'a good conversation is like Jazz'.
But there is a heavy tediousness, and lack of science and emotional sympathy with me as a modern woman, nor contextual awareness to much of the writing. I am prone to tedious abstraction myself, it almost goes with the territory of thinking as a pastime, career and identity.But he's so 'Boys Own' old-school mannish; the thinking exercises have repetitive themes of exotica and foreign climes, animals (frogs,sharks, mating habits), anthropomorphism, evolutionary psychology, engineering, sport, so many many provocative but odd suggestions in reference to sexual politics. He also targets religion, culture, conventional intellectualism, but in the way of a nineteenth century scholar. His 'interesting' is not very originally free-thinking. Sexist in a way which is sad without being terribly repugnant. Self-important but somehow disconnected from the world as I know it.
"I have known beautiful women who are very boring. I am sure there are beautiful women who are very interesting." - from the forward, page 6.
I hate his invention of the word 'po' to signal a conversational provocation for the sake of stimulus.
So! What if we didn't have the phrase 'what if', well then, theoretically speaking, in a hypothetical situation, you might like to invent the word 'po' -except it would sound too silly - there is a children's character - a Telly-tubby- called Po! And, as I demonstrated, it is completely unnecessary. De Bono is wrong when he says the English language lacks the forms and words. He almost talks as if chat is the only form of conversation and seems entirely independent of linguistic analyses.
I still like the man. Worth looking through, this book. It has some interesting ideas about 'interest' and socially-entertaining conversations and it's an insight into this influential thinker so I glad I bought it - but ...