How the Chicago School Overshot the Mark and over 2 million other books are available for Amazon Kindle . Learn more
FREE Delivery in the UK.
In stock.
Dispatched from and sold by Amazon.
Gift-wrap available.
Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

How the Chicago School Overshot the Mark: The Effect of Conservative Economic Analysis on U.S. Antitrust Paperback – 1 Oct 2008

See all 3 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle Edition
"Please retry"
"Please retry"
£25.41 £19.50

Frequently Bought Together

How the Chicago School Overshot the Mark: The Effect of Conservative Economic Analysis on U.S. Antitrust + Antitrust Enterprise: Principle and Execution
Price For Both: £49.95

Buy the selected items together

Free One-Day Delivery for six months with Amazon Student

Product details

Product Description


Chairman Pitofsky's timely book teaches us important truths about antitrust. This book convincingly rebuts the Chicago School approach to economics and competition policy while reminding us that the antitrust laws, when effectively applied, are robust tools that enhance competition and benefit consumers. Chairman Pitofsky and the other distinguished contributors provide a badly needed counterpoint to the excesses of Chicago School economic theory that has led to an overly hands-off and lifeless approach to antitrust enforcement in recent years. This excellent volume should be studied by all those who care about competition policy. (Senator Herb Kohl)

Into the grand antitrust debate between Warren Court advocates, on the one hand, and the treatises and court opinions out of the Chicago School tradition, on the other, comes finally a voice of reasoned moderation (or rather a full-throated chorus of such voices. With a clear-eyed regard for the paramount importance of consumer welfare a the central governing principle of antitrust enforcement, this collection of essays deserves to be read carefully by practitioners, academics and politicians)

When they asserted efficiency as the new benchmark of antitrust, the scholars of Chicago paved the way to very welcome developments. But efficiency is more and more treated as an ideology and therefore it leads to forgetting the facts and restoring presumptions. If avoiding false positives becomes the priority of antitrust, how many real negatives will receive undeserved immunity? The questions raised by this book are no less timely than those raised by those scholars forty years ago and deserve no less attention from practitioners, academics and judges all over the world. I am confident that some copies of it will also be available in the library of the U.S. Supreme Court. (Giuliano Amato, Former Prime Minister of Italy)

This collection of essays (by lawyers and economists, many of whom are former antitrust enforcement officials)

About the Author

Robert Pitofsky has seen all sides of regulatory law enforcement and analysis: government enforcer and judge, private sector defense attorney, government consultant and for over 40 years law professor. He has taught antitrust and other aspects of regulatory law (communications, intellectual property) for about 40 years at New York University and Georgetown and as a Visiting Professor at Harvard and Columbia. He has been a law enforcer with three periods of service at the Federal Trade Commission (culminating in six years as Chairman) and served as defense counsel with several large New York and District of Columbia law firms.

Inside This Book (Learn More)
Browse Sample Pages
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index
Search inside this book:

Customer Reviews

There are no customer reviews yet on
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star

Most Helpful Customer Reviews on (beta) 1 review
1 of 3 people found the following review helpful
Chicago revisited 27 July 2009
By Jorge Alberto Bogo - Published on
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
It is an equilibrated and respectful review of the Chicago heritage, How the Chicago School Overshot the Mark: The Effect of Conservative Economic Analysis on U.S. Antitrust that tries to be objective in pointing out theirs exaggerations and theirs merits. Some of the papers were not new as well as some of the opinions. The one that impressed me most was Eleanor Fox's one.
I would recommend its reading to beginners and also to seasoned practitioners.
Was this review helpful? Let us know