Calling this book a novel is a device for keeping author and publisher out of the civil law courts. The characters ARE the story, and are drawn from life. They are the result of Theroux's many travels, encountering and recording people. The portrayal of the "writer" telling the story is, in large part, autobiographical. If Theroux mixed and matched his characters and events, that is a writer's licence for keeping the reader engaged in his theme.
For the theme of this series of short tales is life. Using the image of a "decomposing writer," he's transformed into a manager of an off-beat hotel while suffering the loss of his muse. The muse has not truly deserted him, nor us, as he records the lives of guests, family, other staff and local residents. Theroux is an avid listener to "the coarse language of life." He listens well, conveying what he gleans with unsurpassed vividness. He may not be composing a novel from what he learns, but he tells us what they imparted. We are watching their existence through his eyes. The view is distorted little, if at all.
Theroux's travels have brought him to understand life isn't a finished work. There's no discernible plot line, simply a series of episodes from birth to the end. Many of the events bear no apparent meaning, but they all add up to an individual's history. That's how he's constructed this book. Those who complain that the plot line is thin need only look in the nearest mirror. Any one of us could be a character here, with notable exception. Nearly all the people the "writer" encounters are astonished to discover his trade. Few however, if any of them, read. His distress at this discovery is apparent, but while it diminishes the narrator, none of the characters feels they've missed anything. They are getting on with other things - their own lives, as inadequate as we may judge that life to be.
There are too many characters in this book to record here. One of the most endearing is the barman Tran, a refugee, and one time boat person. His patience compels our attention and is matched only by his sense of irony. Buddy Hamstra, the hotel's owner, becomes the pivot for many of the story's populace. Theroux returns to Buddy throughout the book, a sun-like presence around which many of the others orbit. He's despised and adored with equal weight depending on the relation he's established with them. He, too, hates and loves with fierce intensity. But his impact on them and the writer is unquestionable. Hamstra becomes the dominant example of Theroux's experience of life's story.
Theroux incorporates various real people in his account. His exchanges on writing with Henry James scholar Leon Edel read with perfect validity. Their conversations are mute but significant. Edel gently nudges the writer to return to his craft. Novels are only the extension of the writer's fantasies. His words could encourage anyone to bring those fantasies to life on the page. Theroux, of course, has done just that with this book. The difference between Theroux and the rest of us is his passion for narrative. [stephen a. haines - Ottawa, Canada]