Most Helpful Customer Reviews
18 of 20 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
A biography of a flawed genius that concentrates on 'flawed', 5 Mar 2003
This review is from: Hitchhiker: A Biography of Douglas Adams (Hardcover)
The problem with a book about a brilliant writer is that you expect it to be brilliantly written and this isn’t. What it is however, is a fantastically well researched history of Douglas Adams writing of his books. The last fifty pages are references to sources (including internet forum postings). It’s more of an academic work than a good read. I really enjoyed it but I’m not sure many people will. This is a book for the real hardcore fan. The kind of person who understands the reference “I just wondered how he knew they were size nine”. As a result it assumes you’ve read, marked and inwardly digested all the books and radio series, I listened to the radio series from the first transmission and while never enough of a fan to attend a convention or wear a silly suit and make ‘beep beep’ noises, have actively sought out everything Douglas Adams wrote. Yet without having read around the subject I don’t know what made the Kamikaze sketch so funny and I felt a bit left out. It makes depressing reading, MJ Simpson is too close to the subject and takes Adams’ brilliance as a given and there are few quotes or examples to enjoy, instead it’s a 300 page story of missed deadlines and displacement activity which is an uncomfortable way to learn about a hero. It’s a cliché to say that you laughed and cried at a book, but with The Salmon of Doubt (Adams posthumous collection) I did both and had to stop to compose myself. It’s a much better tribute to the man.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Read it, didn't make it through the re-read, 25 April 2010
I read the book three or four years ago. Like a lot of other reviewers I found it boring and pedantic and obsessed with finding out the precise number of computers Douglas Adams owned.
I picked it off my shelf a week ago. I wanted to reread it before I decided whether to keep it or get rid of it. I made it to page 30, then I had to give up. It is as boring and pedantic as I remember. What I also recall now is how oddly pointless the book seems. Simpson way of relating facts and anecdotes reminds me of some horrible old aunt telling stories about 'Our Douglas'. "Did you know that our Douglas played in the school play? They mentioned his name in the school paper." "Really, Auntie?" "Yes! Oh, he is such a good boy. Did I ever tell you about the time he had to wear short trousers and he was so embarrassed, you wouldn't believe it." And so on and so on. At no point do I get the feeling that there is a coherent story being told; it's just a bunch of facts piled on top of each other untill the whole thing tips over.
To sum it up, I'm getting rid of this book and I wouldn't recommend anyone getting it in the first place. If you are insanely curious about Douglas Adam's life, then I still recommending saving the money and just borrowing it from a library.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
8 of 10 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
A book for the true fan, 14 Sep 2004
This book does an admirable job at uncovering the truth behind many Adams legends. I find it odd that so many reviewers perceive this as a negative, as if it ought to be a biographer's job to perpetuate myths instead of to investigate them. I think they fear that Adams or his legacy will be somehow diminished by the revelations. They are wrong. After reading Simpson's "Hitchhiker" I was struck with a renewed admiration for Adams. Here was a human being, saddled, we now realise, with exactly the same vanities and foibles as the rest of us, and yet who, despite this, gave us a new and funny way of looking at the world. It's said that fans of Paul McCartney hear the same anecdotes so many times that they number them and play bingo every time Macca is interviewed. The same could be true of fans of Douglas Adams. It is therefore refreshing to find some serious analysis of the facts behind DNA's life. Compared to Nick Webb's "Wish You Were Here", Simpson's book comes across as being more for the true fan than the general reader. Webb, having access to Adams's private files, is better on the details of his subject's lovelife, but, despite being a friend of Adams, shows a worrying ignorance about the works that made his name. For instance, Webb thinks the middle-management people repopulating prehistoric Earth are themselves from a future Earth and that this is some wacky Adams paradox. He's got this badly wrong. They're from an entirely different planet (Golgafrincham as anyone who's read the books can tell you) and the fact that Webb doesn't seem to know or care seems at best bizarre and at worst sloppy, and where it is accurate it often retreads ground from the excellent book "Don't Panic" by Gaiman et al. As the Hitchhiker fanclub's archivist, and stickler for accuracy to boot, you know Simpson's facts are going to be checked, and that what he tells you is not going to be some "definitively innacurate" fairytale, but as close to the truth as he can get.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|