This text by Schultz and Schultz is a poor choice for graduate-level courses. Rather than presenting information that students can use as a foundation to build upon, the authors put their own opinions forward as fact, resulting in a clearly biased text. For example, the book states that humanistic psychology was a failure as a movement because it never entered academia and did not encourage any research, statements which ignore the many humanistic Psychology programs throughout the country (and world) and the fact that Carl Rogers started the enterprise of psychotherapy research. Also, the authors propose several "schools of thought" including Psychoanalysis, Gestalt Psychology, and Cognitive Psychology, which are confusing categories and not representative of the movements throughout Psychology's history--meanwhile leaving out whole areas of psychological study. Students reading this text are consistently confused, as the authors do not distinguish well between theory and application (Psychoanalysis as a therapeutic approach vs. psychoanalytic theory), and the complexities of these movements are lost in the generalizations. Perhaps this text would be useful as additional reading in a History of Psychology course, but as a primary source it is a very poor choice.