£33.28
  • RRP: £36.99
  • You Save: £3.71 (10%)
FREE Delivery in the UK.
Only 1 left in stock (more on the way).
Dispatched from and sold by Amazon.
Gift-wrap available.
Quantity:1
Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

Higher Speculations: Grand Theories and Failed Revolutions in Physics and Cosmology Hardcover – 6 Jan 2011


See all 3 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle Edition
"Please retry"
Hardcover
"Please retry"
£33.28
£33.28 £21.00

Trade In Promotion


Product details

  • Hardcover: 416 pages
  • Publisher: OUP Oxford (6 Jan 2011)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0199599882
  • ISBN-13: 978-0199599882
  • Product Dimensions: 24.4 x 3 x 17.8 cm
  • Average Customer Review: 5.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (1 customer review)
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 967,258 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
  • See Complete Table of Contents

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, and more.

Product Description

Review

Helge Kragh is one of our best historians of physics, and the author of several outstanding books. The idea of a history of highly speculative theories in physics is excellent. Although there are popular accounts of recent cosmological and grand-unifying theories, no historian has so far attempted to bring together old and new cases of such theories. The result makes fascinating reading and induces thought-provoking comparisons. (Olivier Darrigol, CNRS: Sphere/Rehseis)

About the Author

After graduation from the University of Copenhagen in Physics and Chemistry, and a period as teacher in gymnasium schools, Helge Kragh became Associate Professor at Cornell University, Departments of History and Physics. Later, he took positions as Curator at the Steno Museum for Science and Medicine and Professor of the History of Science at the University of Oslo, Norway. Since 1997, he has been Professor of the History of Science and Technology, University of Aarhus, Denmark. He is a Member of the Royal Danish Academy of Science, the International Academy for the History of Science, and of the European Academy of Science. He was President of the European Society for the History of Science (2008-2010).

Inside This Book (Learn More)
Browse Sample Pages
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index
Search inside this book:

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?

Customer Reviews

5.0 out of 5 stars
5 star
1
4 star
0
3 star
0
2 star
0
1 star
0
See the customer review
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

0 of 4 people found the following review helpful By Michael B. Williams on 29 Feb 2012
Format: Hardcover
If only catastrophic anthropogenic global warming fans and assorted $cientist$ read this before they started spending billions trying to destroy western civilisation as we know it.
Mannian maths and Gleick ethic classes aside..this is an excellent book and really worth the time to be read carefully.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)

Amazon.com: 2 reviews
14 of 15 people found the following review helpful
Fabulous philosophy of physics book 23 Sep 2011
By J. Jenkins - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Hardcover Verified Purchase
I'm shocked no one else has reviewed this book. I believe I heard of it through P. Woit's blog about particle physics, he wrote the infamous anti-string tome 'Not Even Wrong'. The book is written by a philosopher but the understanding and lucidity of his analysis is extremely rewarding to any scientifically educated individual. Each chapter discusses a possible 'theory of everything' starting with the 19th century and moving forward, dealing mostly with 20th century potential grand unified theorems. In this respect most of the book reads as a (recent) history of physics work. For ex. he discusses the 'bootstrap' idea of the 60s for unifying the nuclear forces, which fell through when the quark theory gained ground, from the point of view of the time when it appeared: to those scientists working on it at the time, it could very well have turned to be the 'correct' unifying theory, unfortunately now with hindsight it obviously wasn't meant to be. What are some of the characteristics of these failed theories? The tendency for the people working on it to consider one simple idea the basis for an entire universe-view, the quasi-religious fervour they bring to their theories, the divorce from actual evidence and experiment. So the lesson for our current theories, e.g. strings, loop quantum physics, is obvious. Some of the older theories which were abandoned had just as intense a following as string theory does today. Is it even possible to arrive at a 'universal theory' which explains everything from particle physics to cosmology? Despite the faith of physicists, most people who are non-physicists are very very doubtful. It seems rather to be a peculiarity of the human mind that one wishes to oversimplify and reduce all of reality into a simple (or at least all-encompassing) idea. Note that the author does not get very deeply into the actual philosophical issue of whether it is even possible to reduce the universe into one theory (other books such as 'the limits of science' or Barrow's Impossibility deal with this very well). With regards to this he seems to be unconvinced one way or another though the historical lesson adds up very clearly to an answer in the negative.

This is a book I will definitely have to read again soon, within the year, since it is so dense with ideas and facts of interest to any scientifically educated individual or philosophically minded one.
7 of 9 people found the following review helpful
a thorough survey 25 Oct 2011
By Gary R. Miller - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Hardcover Verified Purchase
There is a remarkable amount of documentation here. The material is not overly popularized (dumbed-down). We get glimpses of the author's opinion but the tone is quite fair, almost objective. This is a survey which actually teaches and clarifies.
Were these reviews helpful? Let us know


Feedback