Tom Ambrose's book reads well, providing a brief if selective history of attitudes to and treatment of gays from the Greeks to the present day. Understandably, he concentrates mostly on the 'Modern' ( i.e. post-medieval) period, which is generally well-researched, with an excellent bibliography.The book starts (briefly) with the Greek/ Roman periods, moving on to the medieval church /Renaissance/Reformation attitudes to the subject, though with a distinct European history bias - neither Shakespeare's sonnets nor Christopher Marlowe get a single mention, though Marlowe's Edward II was the first - and still one of the best - plays with homosexuals at its centre - whereas some pretty obscure French poets are covered.
The book takes fire however once he begins to deal with key figures from the 17th century onward, and indeed his narrative is largely through a selection of portraits in their historical contexts - Queen Christina of Sweden, William Beckford, the Ladies of Langollen, Lord Byron and so on through Oscar Wilde, Auden and Isherwood and on to James Baldwin. However, many may find Ambrose's choice of 'iconic' figures predictable, at times dubious and lacking in balance. A whole chapter for example - 14 pages- is given to that social parasite / religious nut 'Baron Corvo' with his unreadable prose. Isherwood, Auden and others in the Chapter 'From Europe to the United States', are given but four pages, and moreover the book contains not a single reference to Quentin Crisp's The Naked Civil Servant.
The book as a whole could and should perhaps have raised the question of What is a gay icon? and Who should be a gay icon? but leaves such interesting questions largely unexplored.
The last chapter is the most interesting - about gays in the Arab world and Africa - surely the most urgent present/ future battleground for the movement. Here I would have liked a more detailed treatment, and a more realistic assessment. The chapter should at least have a question mark after its title,The End of Exile, its conclusions ( and those of the book therefore) being to my mind historically naive.