Most Helpful Customer Reviews
12 of 12 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Visitors may bring their own madness, 6 July 2005
This review is from: The Haunting of Hill House (Paperback)
Doctor Montague has a passion for studying the paranormal and hopes his doctorate in philosophy and degree in anthropology will lend his work in this area an air of respectability. He has rented a haunted house for the summer and, from his list of possibly psychically turned-on individuals, he has selected the most promising candidates and invited them to join him there to stimulate the monstrous pile into providing him with material for his 'definitive work' on the subject. Two of the candidates, Eleanor and Theodora, duly arrive and immediately start as they will go on, with the house and its old retainers, the Dudleys, kicking off their sense of unease. Montague and Luke (not one of the psychically sensitive chosen, but a relative of Hill House's owner) arrive later. As they get to know each other, the house gets to know them and to find and exploit their weaknesses. Poor, lost and lonely Eleanor feels she has found friends - a family even. The house performs for them and terrorises them, but Eleanor begins to enjoy the frisson of terror which gradually diminishes as she feels chosen by the invisible powers within Hill House. She has a growing sense of belonging, not to the new friends from whom she feels more and more alienated, but to the house. The signs of Eleanor's mental disintegration eventually become obvious enough to alarm Montague and the team and the decision he takes in order to remove Eleanor from harm's way, provides the final push as she teeters on the edge. Shirley Jackson's characters are definite 'types' if not stereotypes and the relationships that develop between them are plausible and interesting. The house is described as 'not sane' but the house is certainly not the only lunatic element. Its visitors bring their own range of mental disfigurement with them. Most of the men in this story and all of the women are deeply neurotic, with Eleanor being the top of the heap, 24 carat wacko. They are all excellent subjects for the house to work with. The terror generated is more restrained than the sort you expect to find in the modern 'bloodfest' type of horror. The tale would fail to terrify any reader who could not bring the power of their own imagination to The Haunting of Hill House. For a reader with imagination however, the book is a potent generator of fear. Recommended.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
24 of 26 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
shirley jackson's masterpiece., 10 Sep 2004
This review is from: The Haunting of Hill House (Paperback)
I think where some people are nonplussed by this novel is that they come to it expecting a classic haunted house story, and it is that of course, but it's also a subtle look at the steady disintegration of a young woman's mind. I first read it myself several years ago and didn't like it, I was expecting it to be more like the film. I came back to it again recently and have been completely swept away at Ms Jackson's skill as an author. There are several references to real life haunted house case histories, as in Borley Rectory and Ballechin House, and clearly Ms Jackson was influenced by these, in that she wanted to write a story in which a small party of ghost-hunters hole up in a haunted house to see what will happen. Where this differs from all that though is that Hill House itself appears to be the evil entity, not the ghosts it may contain. She constantly refers to it as a mad place, with a mad appearance. Eleanor Vance, one of the party, is a young woman who has spent many years nursing her invalid mother and missing out on life. She has become deeply introverted and neurotic. (I felt there were some comparisons with Catherine Deneuve's character in "Repulsion"). She wants desperately to belong somewhere, but when the group she finds herself in start to act like a family, i.e joshing each other, teasing etc, she can't cope with it. Some of the early scenes, when the characters are getting to know each other, were reminiscent of "Big Brother". You felt Eleanor needed a Diary Room to retreat to and voice her concerns at! The ghost-hunters do become a family, with Dr Montague, the genial old academic, as the father figure. Hill House itself at times becomes to resemble a comfy sanitorium, with the younger people reduced to a childlike state, spending their days eating and exploring the house and grounds. The spook factors may be too subtle for some people's tastes. This is no Richard Laymon-style horror with machete-wielding psychopaths leaping out of the woodwork. The most frightening things that happen are the hammerings on the walls. What makes this novel great is the way it shows a small bunch of people acting in an unusual set-up, and of course, the final chilling realisation that Hill House wants Eleanor as it's captive. Stephen King in his book "Danse Macabre" said that he found this fact too horrifying for words. Highly recommended.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
13 of 14 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
My view is don't watch the film before you read this, 27 April 2002
This review is from: The Haunting of Hill House (Paperback)
Yes I know I made the basic error, but I couldn't really avoid it. I was very young when I saw the excellent original black and white film. So I only learned then that it was based on a book. Somewhat later I got around to reading the book. For one thing it is remarkably similar to the original film screenplay, lines are identical on page as they are on the film, in certain areas. The quality of the book is not in question, it is a remarkable read, full of suspense and drama, but it all depends on whether you prefer your chills and frights from the page or the screen. Only then, to get the full impact of the storyline, can you decide whether to read this book first then watch the film or vice versa. It's upto you. My own personal choice would be to read this first, then watch the film, but like me, many of you who have already seen the film and not read this book will be left in a quandary. Don't be, this book is a great read, buy it either way.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|