If you haven't seen any of the original and excellent 1960's Harry Palmer thrillers(Ipcress File, Funeral in Berlin, Billion Dollar Brain) starring Michael Caine then these two more recent chapters probabaly won't mean much to you.
If you have then you probably will not like these two 1990's T.V. films as much. However, provided you can look past the lower budget production values and lack of 60's style there is enjoyment to be had in these two films - particularly ''Bullet to Beijing''
Michael Caine was having a definite career slump in the early 1990's - it seemed like his 60's and 70's glory days were by then a distant memory. But in Britain with the introduction of Lad-mags such as ''FHM'' which projected the 1960's Caine image as somewhat of a role-model for the everyman and refreshed peoples memories of ''Ipcress File'' as well as ''Get Carter'', Caine started to get asked a lot if he would ever return to his signature Harry Palmer role. These two films are the result of all those questions and a lack of better options at the time for Caine.
Filmed back to back mainly in Russia - the first film in this set ''Bullet to Beijing'' was originally intended for a theatrical release with ''Midnight in St. Petersburg'' to follow several months later on cable t.v. - In the end both would end up going the t.v. route.
''Bullet'' has visibly more money and thought put into it and Michael Caine does a good job here - I think it's his best performance as Palmer outside of the Ipcress File, here we see an older and lonelier Harry Palmer and overall the film is a tight enough spy film with some good moments.
''Midnight'' looks rushed and everyone seems to be just going through the motions a bit - the story here is like a lower budget remake of ''Bullet'' but if you don't compare it to it's predecessor's it's a reasonable enough if forgetable thriller.
So not a patch on the originals but it's good to see Caine as Palmer again. Happily Michael Caine has since gone on to have a better decade of films over the last ten years.