"Hare" is an account of to the myths, fables and art associated with, well, hares!
The book is split into five chapters; "The Natural and Unnatural History of the Hare" - which focuses more on the unnatural than the natural, "The Mythic Hare" - which examines the role and nature of Hare myths from around the world, "The Hunted Hare", "The Painted Hare" and "Hare Poetry", all of which are self explanatory. I think that it is fare to say that none of these chapters is really readable in isolation as many of the themes and ideas reappear throughout the book. These include themes of speed, cunning, remarkable breeding ability and the protection of Hares for the purposes of hunting by landed gentry.
There are some remarkable sections in this book - the most memorable being the accounts the punishments that were handed down for people found guilty of poaching Hares, or in some cases just touching one. That fact that these laws persisted into the 19th century is remarkable.
While it is clear that this is a meticulously researched book, I found it a rather difficult one as well. For much the book I felt that the real hare was absent from the narrative, and the chapter "The Painted Hare" read as much as a history of art styles as it was of a history of hares in art. This chapter was rich in references to art works, only some of which were shown, and many of those that were included where not visible when reading the related text.
I think that the key issues with this book are its structure, and possibly the lack of a very firm editorial hand. Splitting the book into only five chapters makes each one long, and I felt they tended to ramble, often covering a number of ideas that would have been worthy of a single shorter section. I think that the "tighter" format that more chapters may have produced would have been a significant improvement. Equally, I think that some of the chapters needed a tighter control from the editor. As an example, the chapter on Hare hunting opens with a single sentence that runs for over half a page. This is clearly not a problem in itself, but it does seem indicative of a writing style that tends to ramble a bit.
I was also surprised that the book Masquerade by Kit Williams was not mentioned at all. Given the amount of attention that was once lavished on the hunt for the Golden Hare I would have thought it was one of the more prominent uses of hare imagery in recent years, and certainly better known than many (if not most) of the art works referred to in this book.
If you are a committed hare lover, or have a keen interest in myth, this may be the book for you, but of all the books in this multi-volume series I have read I found this the least accessible. (To this point I have found
Owl (Animal)to be the best book in this series)
I think it might be best to approach this book with an open mind and an understanding that the author does not always get to the point he is making with much rapidity!