- Hardcover: 720 pages
- Publisher: John Wiley & Sons; 2nd Edition edition (19 Sep 2006)
- Language English
- ISBN-10: 047198020X
- ISBN-13: 978-0471980209
- Product Dimensions: 23.1 x 16.3 x 5 cm
- Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 706,632 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- See Complete Table of Contents
 Trade In this Item for up to £13.05
Get an extra £5 when you trade in books worth £10 or more until June 30, 2012. Trade in Handbook of Alternative Assets (Frank J. Fabozzi Series) for an Amazon.co.uk gift card of up to £13.05, which you can then spend on millions of items across the site. Trade-in values may vary (terms apply). Find more products eligible for trade-in.
|
Product details |
More About the Author
Product Description
Product Description
Since the first edition of the Handbook of Alternative Assets was published, significant events–from the popping of the technology bubble and massive accounting scandals to recessions and bear markets–have shifted the financial landscape. These changes have provided author Mark J. P. Anson with an excellent opportunity to examine alternative assets during a different part of the economic cycle than previously observed in the first edition.
Fully revised and updated to reflect today′s financial realities, the Handbook of Alternative Assets, Second Edition covers the five major classes of alternative assets–hedge funds, commodity and managed futures, private equity, credit derivatives, and corporate governance–and outlines the strategies you can use to efficiently incorporate these assets into any portfolio. Throughout the book, new chapters have been added, different data sources accessed, and new conclusions reached.
Designed as both an introduction to the world of alternative assets and as a reference for the active investor, the Handbook of Alternative Assets, Second Edition will help you match alternative assets with your various investment goals.
Fully revised and updated to reflect today′s financial realities, the Handbook of Alternative Assets, Second Edition covers the five major classes of alternative assets–hedge funds, commodity and managed futures, private equity, credit derivatives, and corporate governance–and outlines the strategies you can use to efficiently incorporate these assets into any portfolio. Throughout the book, new chapters have been added, different data sources accessed, and new conclusions reached.
Designed as both an introduction to the world of alternative assets and as a reference for the active investor, the Handbook of Alternative Assets, Second Edition will help you match alternative assets with your various investment goals.
From the Back Cover
Since the first edition of the Handbook of Alternative Assets was published, significant events—from the popping of the technology bubble and massive accounting scandals to recessions and bear markets—have shifted the financial landscape. These changes have provided author Mark J. P. Anson with an excellent opportunity to examine alternative assets during a different part of the economic cycle than previously observed in the first edition.
Fully revised and updated to reflect today′s financial realities, the Handbook of Alternative Assets, Second Edition covers the five major classes of alternative assets—hedge funds, commodity and managed futures, private equity, credit derivatives, and corporate governance—and outlines the strategies you can use to efficiently incorporate these assets into any portfolio. Throughout the book, new chapters have been added, different data sources accessed, and new conclusions reached.
Designed as both an introduction to the world of alternative assets and as a reference for the active investor, the Handbook of Alternative Assets, Second Edition will help you match alternative assets with your various investment goals.
Inside This Book
(Learn More)
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index | Back Cover
Explore More
Concordance
Browse Sample PagesConcordance
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index | Back Cover
Suggested Tags from Similar Products(What's this?)Be the first one to add a relevant tag (keyword that's strongly related to this product)
|
Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store
If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store.
Learn more
What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?
Customer Reviews
There are no customer reviews yet on Amazon.co.uk.
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)
Amazon.com:
8 reviews
13 of 13 people found the following review helpful
Good content, but horribly edited
18 July 2007
Format:Hardcover
I had to buy this for the CAIA exam. In reading it, I find on average one typo a page. I have found at least one chart misreferenced in the text. It is very distracting. Given that Mr. Anson is on the Curriculum Committee for the exam, it is not surprising that his text is on the list of required readings. Perhaps it is all that is out there. But Shame on Wiley for publishing it in the rough draft that it seems to be.
10 of 11 people found the following review helpful
Uneven
29 Aug 2007
Format:Hardcover
I have to agree with the woman from SC below -- this book is horribly edited. The typos are everywhere.
Also, some of the statements are questionable generalizations - e.g. p.100, Anson is quoting a hedge fund document:
Anson:
"Consider the following language from a hedge fund disclosure document.
'The fund's objective is to make investments in public securities that generate a long term return in excess of that generated by the overall US equity market...'
...[T]he manager identifies that it invests in the US public equity market."
In fact, the sentence quoted from the hedge fund document does not state what Anson says, only that the return should exceed the overall US equity market, long-term, by investing in public securities, not necessarily US public equities.
There are also questionable statements about portfolio theory: p.21 "Diversification, [comma? sic] is a way to minimize the risk of underperformance, but, at the same time, it minimizes the probability of outperformance."
In fact, diversification's benefit can be divorced from any benchmark, and the conclusion that a reader might draw from this (that concentrated managers will outperform more diversified ones with regularity, or are somehow more attractive) is misleading. Concentrated managers will have higher variance. Diversification decreases the expected variance around the expected mean return -- it does not necessarily lower the expected return (if you diversify with higher returning investments, your expected return can go up while your expected variance can come down, even if the new investments are more volatile that the old), or the "probability of outperformance", which is not an output of portfolio theory.
A more accurate statement in this context would be that, "As your portfolio converges to the benchmark portfolio, your returns will converge to the benchmark return."
Here's one more: p. 102
"Generally, process risk is not a risk that investors wish to bear. Nor is it a risk for which they expect to be compensated. How would an investor go about pricing the process risk of a hedge fund manager? It can't be quantified, and it can't be calibrated. There is no way to tell whether an institutional investor is being properly compensated for this risk."
The second sentence here answers the fifth sentence? Since process risk is entirely diversifiable, the proper compensation (risk premium) for this risk is simply zero.
There are lots of these. It's just too broad, too sweeping in it's generalizations, which lead to more questions.
Also, some of the statements are questionable generalizations - e.g. p.100, Anson is quoting a hedge fund document:
Anson:
"Consider the following language from a hedge fund disclosure document.
'The fund's objective is to make investments in public securities that generate a long term return in excess of that generated by the overall US equity market...'
...[T]he manager identifies that it invests in the US public equity market."
In fact, the sentence quoted from the hedge fund document does not state what Anson says, only that the return should exceed the overall US equity market, long-term, by investing in public securities, not necessarily US public equities.
There are also questionable statements about portfolio theory: p.21 "Diversification, [comma? sic] is a way to minimize the risk of underperformance, but, at the same time, it minimizes the probability of outperformance."
In fact, diversification's benefit can be divorced from any benchmark, and the conclusion that a reader might draw from this (that concentrated managers will outperform more diversified ones with regularity, or are somehow more attractive) is misleading. Concentrated managers will have higher variance. Diversification decreases the expected variance around the expected mean return -- it does not necessarily lower the expected return (if you diversify with higher returning investments, your expected return can go up while your expected variance can come down, even if the new investments are more volatile that the old), or the "probability of outperformance", which is not an output of portfolio theory.
A more accurate statement in this context would be that, "As your portfolio converges to the benchmark portfolio, your returns will converge to the benchmark return."
Here's one more: p. 102
"Generally, process risk is not a risk that investors wish to bear. Nor is it a risk for which they expect to be compensated. How would an investor go about pricing the process risk of a hedge fund manager? It can't be quantified, and it can't be calibrated. There is no way to tell whether an institutional investor is being properly compensated for this risk."
The second sentence here answers the fifth sentence? Since process risk is entirely diversifiable, the proper compensation (risk premium) for this risk is simply zero.
There are lots of these. It's just too broad, too sweeping in it's generalizations, which lead to more questions.
6 of 6 people found the following review helpful
Good Book but do not upgrade to online version from amazon!
16 Jan 2008
Format:Hardcover
The content of the book is good and useful. However please do not upgrade to amazon online accesss. I upgraded and every other day you cannot acccess the entire book online.You can only browse first 8 pages and then when you call amazon customer service they would temporarily resolve the issue only to have the same issue reoccur again.
Were these reviews helpful?
Let us know
Listmania!
Look for similar items by category
Look for similar items by subject
Feedback
- Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
- I am the Author, and I want to comment on my book.
- I am the Publisher, and I want to comment on this book.
