- Hardcover: 284 pages
- Publisher: OUP USA; illustrated edition edition (2 Sep 2004)
- Language English
- ISBN-10: 0195151453
- ISBN-13: 978-0195151459
- Product Dimensions: 23.9 x 16.3 x 2.3 cm
- Average Customer Review: 5.0 out of 5 stars See all reviews (1 customer review)
- Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 2,743,041 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- See Complete Table of Contents
Gut Reactions
and over one million other books are available for Amazon Kindle .
Learn more
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Did you know you can trade in your old books for an Amazon.co.uk Gift Card to spend on the things you want? Plus, get an extra £5 Gift Certificate when you trade in books worth £10 or more before June 30, 2012. Visit the Books Trade-In Store for more details. |
Product details |
More About the Author
Product Description
Review
[an] important and intriguing book ... it is at all times carefully argued and written with the verve which is characteristic of its author and which is so enjoyable ... No one interested in the emotions should ignore it. (Peter Goldie, Mind )
Product Description
Gut Reactions is an interdisciplinary defense of the claim that emotions are perceptions in a double sense. First of all, they are perceptions of changes in the body, but, through the body, they also allow us to literally perceive danger, loss, and other matters of concern. This proposal, which Prinz calls the embodied appraisal theory, reconciles the long standing debate between those who say emotions are cognitive and those who say they are noncognitve. The basic idea behind embodied appraisals is captured in the familiar notion of a "gut reaction," which has been overlooked by much emotion research. Prinz also addresses emotional valence, emotional consciousness, and the debate between evolutionary psychologists and social constructionists.
Inside This Book
(Learn More)
Suggested Tags from Similar Products(What's this?)Be the first one to add a relevant tag (keyword that's strongly related to this product)
|
What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?
Customer Reviews
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
Format:Paperback
Much has been made of William James resucitation in Prinz's work (which he himself admits with reservations) but I feel his work is best read alongside a number of other people moving in a similar direction. Antonio Damasio is referenced by him a number of times and all Damasio's books are worth reading (although the Spinoza one bored me a bit in places. He doesn't reference Peter Carruthers here because this book was published in 2004 and Carruthers main work was published later and Carruthers does reference this book.
The idea that emotions are irrational and need to be controlled by the cool calm intellect (Kant etc)has been under attack for some years and is under heavy attacke here as in Damasio. A more integrated approach is dawning and this book is an excellent study of many aspects of that dawning integration. It is well-written, well researched and well argued. Of course there are contentious ideas in it. It wouldn't be much of a serious work if there weren't. Alongside the other two authors I've mentioned I'd recommend this book to enyone interested in emotion research. The only thing wrong with this book is the rather high number of typographical errors that get a bit annoying. It is as if it has been spellchecked but not properly proofread since most of the mistakes are wrong or omitted words.
The idea that emotions are irrational and need to be controlled by the cool calm intellect (Kant etc)has been under attack for some years and is under heavy attacke here as in Damasio. A more integrated approach is dawning and this book is an excellent study of many aspects of that dawning integration. It is well-written, well researched and well argued. Of course there are contentious ideas in it. It wouldn't be much of a serious work if there weren't. Alongside the other two authors I've mentioned I'd recommend this book to enyone interested in emotion research. The only thing wrong with this book is the rather high number of typographical errors that get a bit annoying. It is as if it has been spellchecked but not properly proofread since most of the mistakes are wrong or omitted words.
Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)
Amazon.com:
2 reviews
19 of 19 people found the following review helpful
A Ground Breaking Re-Evaluation of Emotion and Percpetion
11 Mar 2006
Format:Hardcover|Amazon Verified Purchase
This is an interesting and challenging book.
Challenging, not in the sense of being difficult, but in terms of its presentation of an array of ideas that are not as well known as they should be.
A central concept is that emotions are not simply generated in the brain, but are instead our perceptions of changes in the body. This idea has long history stretching back to the Ancient Greeks, the Ancient Taoist writers and some Hindu philosophers. In more recent times the fundamental thesis can be traced back the Harvard psychologist and philosopher William James, who is often - and with good reason - called the father of modern psychology. In recent years Antonio Damasio from the University of Iowa has not just resurrected the idea, but expanded and developed it.
Yet there is obviously more to an emotion of fear than an increase in heart rate. Therefore some researchers have proposed that emotions are a form of environmental perception, while other have suggested that though an emotion might start with a physical perception, that perception is leavened by constant judgments concerning our relationship with our environment.
Jesse Prinz from the University of North Carolina takes the theory an important step further. He argues that emotion is a form of perception that tells us something about our well being. When we feel an emotion, it is first of all derived from the body. Yet we all have the experience of emotions being meaningful. In the Prinz scheme of "embodied appraisals," emotions are body derived, meaningful, but they do not require either judgment nor cognition. They just are. He also goes to some lengths to distinguish between emotions and other affective states, like moods and motivations.
This is an attractive model, that takes account of our personal experiences, as well as clinical observations, and the ways in which some people respond better to body therapies than to talk therapies.
The theory will doubtless need to be revised as more information is gathered about the mind/brain/body connection. But this is a book which will be of great interest to anyone interested in these connections, or for anyone who works with or experiences emotional issues.
It requires some background in basic neuroscience and psychology, but it is a book that will repay a little effort many times over.
Challenging, not in the sense of being difficult, but in terms of its presentation of an array of ideas that are not as well known as they should be.
A central concept is that emotions are not simply generated in the brain, but are instead our perceptions of changes in the body. This idea has long history stretching back to the Ancient Greeks, the Ancient Taoist writers and some Hindu philosophers. In more recent times the fundamental thesis can be traced back the Harvard psychologist and philosopher William James, who is often - and with good reason - called the father of modern psychology. In recent years Antonio Damasio from the University of Iowa has not just resurrected the idea, but expanded and developed it.
Yet there is obviously more to an emotion of fear than an increase in heart rate. Therefore some researchers have proposed that emotions are a form of environmental perception, while other have suggested that though an emotion might start with a physical perception, that perception is leavened by constant judgments concerning our relationship with our environment.
Jesse Prinz from the University of North Carolina takes the theory an important step further. He argues that emotion is a form of perception that tells us something about our well being. When we feel an emotion, it is first of all derived from the body. Yet we all have the experience of emotions being meaningful. In the Prinz scheme of "embodied appraisals," emotions are body derived, meaningful, but they do not require either judgment nor cognition. They just are. He also goes to some lengths to distinguish between emotions and other affective states, like moods and motivations.
This is an attractive model, that takes account of our personal experiences, as well as clinical observations, and the ways in which some people respond better to body therapies than to talk therapies.
The theory will doubtless need to be revised as more information is gathered about the mind/brain/body connection. But this is a book which will be of great interest to anyone interested in these connections, or for anyone who works with or experiences emotional issues.
It requires some background in basic neuroscience and psychology, but it is a book that will repay a little effort many times over.
6 of 9 people found the following review helpful
Rehabilitation of William James; only this time with reason...
19 Oct 2008
Format:Paperback
Prinz's book is another, though particularly sophisticated, attempt to rehabilitate William James' theory of emotion in philosophy. It draws upon Prinz's wide-ranging and thorough knowledge of recent work done in cognitive neuroscience and marries this with his avowed commitment to empiricist principles.
Basically, the trick Prinz plays is as follows:
James claimed emotions were the perception of certain feelings or sensations (not perceptions or judgments of states of affairs in the world that bring about the feelings, as the cognitivists claim). For James, we have these sensations in response to states of affairs in the world, and then we perceive those sensations (we perceive our cold sweat and raised heartbeat as fear). It is our perception of this sensation that IS the emotion.
Now, the upshot of James's theory is that our emotions are arational or irrational irruptions in an otherwise rational life.
Cognitivists have contested this. Authors such as Solomon in The Passions, Kenny in his now classic Action, Emotion and Will, Goldie in The Emotions, the cognitivist psychologist Richard Lazarus in his Emotion and Adaptation, Nussbaum in her (much maligned) Upheavals of Thought, Gabriele Taylor in her Pride, Shame, and Guilt and so on have all argued, contra James, that emotions are constituted by judgements or evaluative beliefs (or intentional feeling in Goldie's version).
Prinz seeks to rehabilitate James but in a manner that doesn't imply that emotions are arational or irrational. He wants to revive James's theory though made more robust through the adoption of some of the insights of cognitivism--chiefly Lazarus's version. Prinz does this by imbuing those gut reactions with psychosemantic content by rendering Lazarus's notion of core relational themes sub-personal. You might find this move of Prinz's to be either an ingenious piece of philosophical theory or a peice of hopelessly flawed metaphysics. Phil Hutchinson has argued forcefully in his Shame and Philosophythat the latter depiction is most accurate (and he then offers an alternative framework for understanding emotion: "world-taking cognitivism"). Wherever one stands, Prinz's book should not be ignored. Just, don't believe the hype!
Basically, the trick Prinz plays is as follows:
James claimed emotions were the perception of certain feelings or sensations (not perceptions or judgments of states of affairs in the world that bring about the feelings, as the cognitivists claim). For James, we have these sensations in response to states of affairs in the world, and then we perceive those sensations (we perceive our cold sweat and raised heartbeat as fear). It is our perception of this sensation that IS the emotion.
Now, the upshot of James's theory is that our emotions are arational or irrational irruptions in an otherwise rational life.
Cognitivists have contested this. Authors such as Solomon in The Passions, Kenny in his now classic Action, Emotion and Will, Goldie in The Emotions, the cognitivist psychologist Richard Lazarus in his Emotion and Adaptation, Nussbaum in her (much maligned) Upheavals of Thought, Gabriele Taylor in her Pride, Shame, and Guilt and so on have all argued, contra James, that emotions are constituted by judgements or evaluative beliefs (or intentional feeling in Goldie's version).
Prinz seeks to rehabilitate James but in a manner that doesn't imply that emotions are arational or irrational. He wants to revive James's theory though made more robust through the adoption of some of the insights of cognitivism--chiefly Lazarus's version. Prinz does this by imbuing those gut reactions with psychosemantic content by rendering Lazarus's notion of core relational themes sub-personal. You might find this move of Prinz's to be either an ingenious piece of philosophical theory or a peice of hopelessly flawed metaphysics. Phil Hutchinson has argued forcefully in his Shame and Philosophythat the latter depiction is most accurate (and he then offers an alternative framework for understanding emotion: "world-taking cognitivism"). Wherever one stands, Prinz's book should not be ignored. Just, don't believe the hype!
Were these reviews helpful?
Let us know
Customer Discussions
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|
Listmania!
Look for similar items by category
Look for similar items by subject
Feedback
- Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
- I am the Author, and I want to comment on my book.
- I am the Publisher, and I want to comment on this book.
