60 used & new from £0.01

Have one to sell? Sell yours here
 
 
Granta 77: What We Think of America (Granta: The Magazine of New Writing)
 
See larger image
 

Granta 77: What We Think of America (Granta: The Magazine of New Writing) (Paperback)

by Ian Jack (Editor)
4.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (2 customer reviews)

Available from these sellers.


5 new from £0.01 55 used from £0.01

Customers Viewing This Page May Be Interested in These Sponsored Links

  (What is this?)
   Granta opens new browser window
www.granta.com  -  Subscribe to Granta. The magazine of new writing
  
 

Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought

Granta 94: On the Road Again - Where Travel Writing Went Next (Granta: The Magazine of New Writing)

Granta 94: On the Road Again - Where Travel Writing Went Next (Granta: The Magazine of New Writing)

by Ian Jack
4.0 out of 5 stars (1)  £7.49
War Zones: 96 (Granta: The Magazine of New Writing)

War Zones: 96 (Granta: The Magazine of New Writing)

by Ian Jack
4.0 out of 5 stars (1)  £8.99
Granta 73: Necessary Journeys

Granta 73: Necessary Journeys

by Ian Jack
£8.99
Granta 93: 93: God's Own Countries (Granta: The Magazine of New Writing)

Granta 93: 93: God's Own Countries (Granta: The Magazine of New Writing)

by Ian Jack
£9.99
Granta 76: Music (Granta: The Magazine of New Writing)

Granta 76: Music (Granta: The Magazine of New Writing)

by Ian Jack
5.0 out of 5 stars (1)  £9.99
Explore similar items

Product details

  • Paperback: 352 pages
  • Publisher: Granta Books (14 Mar 2002)
  • Language English
  • ISBN-10: 0903141507
  • ISBN-13: 978-0903141505
  • Product Dimensions: 20.6 x 14.4 x 1.6 cm
  • Average Customer Review: 4.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (2 customer reviews)
  • Amazon.co.uk Sales Rank: 829,092 in Books (See Bestsellers in Books)

Product Description

Amazon.co.uk Review

The bulk of Granta 77: What We Think of America, is devoted to exploring the effect of American culture, politics and economics on 24 writers in the light of the horrific events of September 11, 2001. As editor Ian Jack states in his introduction, the pieces here "are not about that day, nor are they excuses for it" but an attempt to understand quite why, after the initial outpouring of sympathy, a mood of anti-Americanism seemed to take hold. The most vocal critics of the period argued that America's policies had, effectively, "caused" the attacks. Strains of "they had it coming to them" were also heard across the globe.

With the exception of Harold Pinter who describes the United States as a "fully-fledged, award-winning, gold-plated monster", the majority of contributors offer only fairly measured critiques of American foreign policy. Ahdaf Soueif and Raja Shehadeh condemn its failure to address the issue of a Palestinian state. While Ramachandra Guha maintains that it is the curious co-existence of contradictory values--democratic and yet instinctively imperialist--that tends to make America "not a pretty sight" on the world's stage. John Gray argues that America is just "too rich in contradictions for any definition of it to be possible"; in his opinion it is actually "unknowable". Doris Lessing makes a similar point, in her view all talk of "America as if it were a homogenous unity isn't useful" but she does go on to hazard a few, actually rather pertinent, "generalisations" of her own. Taken individually some of the essays are quite insubstantial but, without wishing to be banal, it is astonishing quite how thought-provoking they are as whole. Ranging from the intimate and autobiographical to the polemical, they provide an intriguing assessment of the world's remaining superpower. With an extract from JM Coetzee's novel Youth and pieces from Blake Morrison and Ziauddin Sardar, this issue is an absorbing read.--Travis Elborough



Product Description

The events of September 11 were terrible; their consequences might prove to be more so. But out of them has arisen what might be called the "but" sentiment, as in "It was terrible...but the Americans were asking for it/deserved it/should have expected it". You didn't have to be on the West Bank or in Kabul to hear it. The same thought was there in British and European newspapers, in the country pubs of Kent, in the bars of Barcelona and Frankfurt. An undertow of feeling was suddenly exposed: anti-Americanism. Is the US really so disliked? If so, why? Granta asked 20 distinguished writers across the world to describe how America has affected them - culturally, politically, economically, as citizens, as writers, as children and as adults, for better or worse.

Tag this product

 (What's this?)
Think of a tag as a keyword or label you consider is strongly related to this product.
Tags will help all customers organize and find favorite items.
Your tags: Add your first tag
 

What Do Customers Ultimately Buy After Viewing This Item?

Granta 77: What We Think of America (Granta: The Magazine of New Writing)
70% buy the item featured on this page:
Granta 77: What We Think of America (Granta: The Magazine of New Writing) 4.0 out of 5 stars (2)
Granta 76: Music (Granta: The Magazine of New Writing)
15% buy
Granta 76: Music (Granta: The Magazine of New Writing) 5.0 out of 5 stars (1)
£9.99
War Zones: 96 (Granta: The Magazine of New Writing)
11% buy
War Zones: 96 (Granta: The Magazine of New Writing) 4.0 out of 5 stars (1)
£8.99
Granta 61: The Sea (Granta: The Magazine of New Writing)
4% buy
Granta 61: The Sea (Granta: The Magazine of New Writing)
£7.99

 

Customer Reviews

2 Reviews
5 star:    (0)
4 star:
 (2)
3 star:    (0)
2 star:    (0)
1 star:    (0)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
4.0 out of 5 stars (2 customer reviews)
 
 
 
 
Share your thoughts with other customers:
Most Helpful Customer Reviews

 
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars Looking to and from America after September 11, 1 April 2003
By A Customer
After the terrorist attacks of September 2001, Granta asked around two dozen writers and intellectuals from all over the world to say what they thought the United States represented. Some chose to answer personally, sharing their first visits to the US, or even the first moments when they learned that it existed. Michael Ignatieff, now a professor in human rights at Harvard, talks of what he believes America represents: a big idea that is too big for Americans to have for their own – the US should be shared. British playwright Harold Pinter sees the US as an entirely malevolent force, recalling the bombing of Yugoslavia in the late 1990s. Although the collection is intended as a response to the September attacks, few of the contributors talk about 9/11. They look beyond that personal and national tragedy into their own experiences. If there is a typical response, it is that the United States will long outlast the effects of the terrorist attacks. Of course, for Harold Pinter it is the potential for mischief that will survive, while for Ignatieff what will last is the call of America’s original ideals beyond its borders.

The issue also addresses issues that in early 2002 were urgent and ever-present, but have since been forgotten as the United States has shifted its attention to Iraq. A photoessay shows the demise of the Taliban, and the rump of Afghanistan’s culture trying to recover from 25 years of war. Bearded men in baggy trousers play football in Kabul, while a shot of the main street in the Afghan capital shows an endless series of ruins. An essay from a young Muslim in England describing an extended stay in Saudi Arabia reveals that that country’s government is attempting to rewrite the history of its own territory as it has in Bosnia and Afghanistan. The Saudi government is erasing the Ottoman Turkish architectural heritage of Mecca and Medina in favour of what it regards as a more authentic ‘Arab’ style – its as if the Turks were never there. A last essay looks at madrasas in Pakistan, which continue to provide a rudimentary education to the poorest levels of society. This Pakistani problem has not been solved, as last year’s elections show, and a generation is now being educated in a way that bears little relation to the great traditions of Islamic education.

What we think of America looks at what has become the central issue of world politics from the most personal perspectives. Rather than looking at what Robert Kagan has to say about the split between Europe and the US, look at what real people have to say about America, and what are the problems that Europe and America must face in the next decade.

Comment Comment | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)



 
4.0 out of 5 stars Looking to and from America after September 11, 1 April 2003
By A Customer
After the terrorist attacks of September 2001, Granta asked around two dozen writers and intellectuals from all over the world to say what they thought the United States represented. Some chose to answer personally, sharing their first visits to the US, or even the first moments when they learned that it existed. Michael Ignatieff, now a professor in human rights at Harvard, talks of what he believes America represents: a big idea that is too big for Americans to have for their own - the US should be shared. British playwright Harold Pinter sees the US as an entirely malevolent force, recalling the bombing of Yugoslavia in the late 1990s. Although the collection is intended as a response to the September attacks, few of the contributors talk about 9/11. They look beyond that personal and national tragedy into their own experiences. If there is a typical response, it is that the United States will long outlast the effects of the terrorist attacks. Of course, for Harold Pinter it is the potential for mischief that will survive, while for Ignatieff what will last is the call of America's original ideals beyond its borders.

The issue also addresses issues that in early 2002 were urgent and ever-present, but have since been forgotten as the United States has shifted its attention to Iraq. A photoessay shows the demise of the Taliban, and the rump of Afghanistan's culture trying to recover from 25 years of war. Bearded men in baggy trousers play football in Kabul, while a shot of the main street in the Afghan capital shows an endless series of ruins. An essay from a young Muslim in England describing an extended stay in Saudi Arabia reveals that that country's government is attempting to rewrite the history of its own territory as it has in Bosnia and Afghanistan. The Saudi government is erasing the Ottoman Turkish architectural heritage of Mecca and Medina in favour of what it regards as a more authentic 'Arab' style - its as if the Turks were never there. A last essay looks at madrasas in Pakistan, which continue to provide a rudimentary education to the poorest levels of society. This Pakistani problem has not been solved, as last year's elections show, and a generation is now being educated in a way that bears little relation to the great traditions of Islamic education.

What we think of America looks at what has become the central issue of world politics from the most personal perspectives. Rather than looking at what Robert Kagan has to say about the split between Europe and the US, look at what real people have to say about America, and what are the problems that Europe and America must face in the next decade.

Comment Comment | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)


Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
 
 
 
Only search this product's reviews



Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 


Active discussions in related forums
   
Related forums


Listmania!


Look for similar items by category


Look for similar items by subject


Feedback

Ad

Your Recent History

 (What's this?)

After viewing product detail pages or search results, look here to find an easy way to navigate back to pages you are interested in.