GOSPEL is both interesting and infuriating. The latter, because it's twice as long as it need be. Barnhardt has no discipline as a writer, and he didn't get the severe editor he needs. He is afflicted with logorrhea, and rambles on and on with trivia and chitchat. But all this is interspersed with some illuminating stuff. The basic structural idea -- paralleling a first-century text (not really a gospel) and the 20th century efforts to find, keep, and translate it -- is a good one. But it becomes bogged down in irrelevant subplots, random observations, minor characters, aimless drifting, etc. It must have been written after INDIANA JONES and been modelled on the same idea, with definite movie possibilities in mind. But I doubt that Barnhardt would be capable of a screenplay. His would be 300 pages. And he drags the reader all over the Western World -- Oxford, Florence, Rome, Assissi, Jerusalem, Mt. Athos, Athens, Alexandria, Aswan, Khartoum, Addis Ababa, New Orleans, etc. Barnhardt has apparently been all these places, and wants to share the experience with us. Not to mention the travels of Matthias, the "gospel" writer. Recommended if you have the patience. But it would be twice as good if the writer were more focussed.