God's Undertaker: Has Science Buried God? [Paperback]

 

 

Create your own review

In this very readable and well-researched book John Lennox does a brilliant job of exposing the real issues involved in any discussion of the relationship between science and religion. The fundamental point, which he makes so well, is that the debate is NOT about science VERSUS religion, but has to do with different world views (namely naturalism - the view that there is nothing but nature and the material world - contrasted with theism - the view that there is a God ) and the relationship of each with science. Dr Lennox then asks the all-important question: Which world view sits most comfortably with science?

What is so important about this book is that it does not counter the popular rhetoric and sloganeering (characteristic of many of those who believe that naturalism is the world view that is the logical consequence of science) with more of the same. In his careful and systematic examination of the scientific evidence Dr Lennox shows that science is not only highly consistent with a theistic world view, but even points towards it. To this end he takes us on a journey that considers the history and limits of science, as well as many of its most up-to-date findings including modern evolutionary theory, design theory, irreducible complexity and information theory. Bringing to bear his analytical and logical skills as a research mathematician, he also exposes many fallacious arguments that are often used to "prove" that science has buried God.

I highly recommend this book to anyone who seriously wishes both to understand the real nature of the debate that is currently receiving much exposure in the media, and to come to a conclusion based on evidence and reason rather than prejudice and emotion.

Nigel Cutland
Professor of Pure Mathematics
University of York, UK

Curious how the most negative reviewers of this book don't seem to engage with it's central points and hence don't seem to have read it properly?

Anyway, there are many good general qualities about this book already addressed by other reviewers. For me the most notable and pressing points of value that Lennox makes are the following:

1) There isn't a necessary tension between science and religion - rather between competing worldviews - most notably (for the purposes of this book) - naturalism and theism. Either one of these basic outlooks can use science legitimately to expand material knowledge, but either one can also quite easily end up using it selectively to fit in with it's ultimate assumptions and aims. So, prescriptive worldviews are the problem. (It was the Aristotelian worldview that Galileo had to overcome - held by secular academics as well as church authorities - not Christianity as such.)

2) 'God of the gaps' can actually be a tag given to naturalists in some cases ('evolution' of the gaps), where gaps in our knowledge are assumed to be obviously fillable by evolutionary processes, ahead of the necessary evidence. However, it can also be applied to areas where science has reached its distant shores and has been left with a logical impasse which it is impotent to cross using experimentation and naturalistic concepts. In other words, it is possible for science and reason to identify and demarkate areas that are inexplicable by scientific investigation itself (- in other words it's not merely a matter of time before they are fixed). There is one area (possibly among others) below where Lennox clearly seems to think that this has happened.

3) DNA - still unexplained in terms of origins, and according to the mathematical prowess of Lennox (using information theory) inexplicable unless you accept that there must be a more fundamental source of information within the universe, from which DNA can have been 'programmed' (my quote marks). Essentially, Lennox draws upon various information theorists to tentatively posit a 'law of conservation of information' which would mean that information (and hence 'intelligence') cannot be built-up from unintelligent inputs, and is hence more fundamental to the design of the universe than previously thought (it is accepted in the case of energy, why not intelligence?). In making this point, Lennox appears to give a damning critique of the explanations used by Richard Dawkins in his book 'Climbing Mount Improbable' where he tries to make the evolution of DNA seem more credible according to Darwinist mechanisms. Possibly I have overly simplified this central proposition of Lennox, but the details are there to be read (should you feel compelled to argue with it), and I'll be damned if I can find, on the internet, any decent responses to the point Lennox is making. It is as if nobody wants to notice, or engage with, such a point. Perhaps some generous and enthusiastic Naturalist can put me straight in the comments section to this review, regarding where Lennox has gone wrong with this proposal, because it seems pretty convincing to me. (and please don't quibble about where 'God' must have got the intelligence from etc - the issue is WHETHER IT IS FUNDAMENTAL OR NOT - we follow the evidence first - then worry about the consequences - right?)

An important point to make, since it relates to the probable expectations of most readers out there, is that Lennox's arguments don't particularly make a case for Christianity - (and he doesn't actually mention it that much) - his arguments point merely towards a creative force and a fundamental property of intelligence within the universe - which of course is compatible with the majority of religious thought (including - although it doesn't necessarily lead to - Christianity)

The five stars are because the book was less dogmatic (religiously) than I expected, and more thought provoking in areas that I thought would have been considered out of bounds by Lennox (evolution), than I was expecting. The pleasure I took here wasn't because I was particularly delighted to give Darwinism a kicking, merely because I wasn't familiar with his arguments and they took me by surprise. Conceivably , admittedly, Lennox could have made almost all the same key points without introducing distinctly Christian allusions at all.

This is a very important book, as witness the glowing review of it in the Guardian - not known for its praise for God-botherers. Not only is it both concise and clear, it packs an enormous amount of information in. Lennox, though a mathematician, clearly has a wide knowledge of cosmology, physics, philosophy and biology to name just a few of the disciplines he discusses. I have a first degree in microbiology and genetics and yet learned a lot of new genetics from reading this.

He also has a great writing style which is witty, charming and remarkably free from rhetoric and rant which so often mar such books on both sides of the debate. Whether you agree with Lennox's conclusion or not, he will take you on a fascinating journey of discovery, on which very few readers will have visited all the varied stopping-off points.

Dr Trevor Stammers, Lecturer in Healthcare Ethics, St Mary's University College, Surrey

Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review

› See all 47 customer reviews on Amazon.co.uk

 

5.0 out of 5 stars Inspiring and authorative
John Lennox uses well laid out arguments but the book is not overly technical. His points and conclusions are convincing.

Published 29 days ago by John Tyrell

5.0 out of 5 stars A 'Must Read'
This book is fantastic for explaining just how the universe works, and why it would be impossible without God. Read more

Published 1 month ago by Ms. J. Bland

5.0 out of 5 stars Sheer genius
I read and immediately reread this book as there was so much meaning and insight in it, that I was afraid I had mist some of it the first time round. Read more

Published 2 months ago by Roy Meintjes

5.0 out of 5 stars Great Book.
What a great book by John C. Lennox. Every school teacher and lecturer should read this before they decide to teach Darwinistic theories which Lennox shows, doesn't hold... Read more

Published 9 months ago by Haf

5.0 out of 5 stars God's Undertaker
What a marvellous demolition of humanistic wishy-washy nothingness.

Love and kisses,

Ron S.

Published 10 months ago by Ron S.

1.0 out of 5 stars Surprisingly week and predictable.
I was hoping for a good challenging read but was very disappointed but one things does stand out as you read; Dawkins has really wound up the author. Read more

Published 11 months ago by Mr. C. Edwards

5.0 out of 5 stars Another excellent addition to the debate
Another excellent example of reasoned, measured debate on the question of the existence of God. Whether you come to this book as a believer or non-believer will probably determine... Read more

Published 11 months ago by Mr. P. V. Roberts

5.0 out of 5 stars The answer is a re-sounding NO
A very readable, well-referenced, strong work showing that the atheism of some scientists has very little to do with science and much to do with their pre-conceived atheist... Read more

Published 13 months ago by E. Danielyan

5.0 out of 5 stars Thought provoking.
The book begins by addressing the real question: is there a war between science and religion? Lennox concludes that no there isn't, but there is a war going on between the... Read more

Published 14 months ago by Mr. B. Shepherd

5.0 out of 5 stars A First-Rate Contribution To A Much-Needed Scientific Debate
I'm very glad to see so many robust reviews of this book appearing here since I first bought it. This suggests Lennox has succeeded in offering well-reasoned and well-argued... Read more

Published 14 months ago by Enthusiast

Search Customer Reviews
Only search this product's reviews

› See all 47 customer reviews on Amazon.co.uk

Search Listmania!