Godless Morality: Keeping Religion Out Of Ethics and over 2 million other books are available for Amazon Kindle . Learn more
£7.51
  • RRP: £8.99
  • You Save: £1.48 (16%)
FREE Delivery in the UK on orders over £10.
Only 4 left in stock (more on the way).
Dispatched from and sold by Amazon.
Gift-wrap available.
Quantity:1
Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

Godless Morality: Keeping Religion Out of Ethics Paperback – 30 Jul 2004


See all 4 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle Edition
"Please retry"
Paperback
"Please retry"
£7.51
£3.80 £0.01

Trade In Promotion


Frequently Bought Together

Godless Morality: Keeping Religion Out of Ethics + Looking In the Distance: The Human Search for Meaning + Doubts and Loves: What Is Left of Christianity
Price For All Three: £23.21

Buy the selected items together


Product details

  • Paperback: 176 pages
  • Publisher: Canongate Books; New Ed edition (30 July 2004)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 1841955787
  • ISBN-13: 978-1841955780
  • Product Dimensions: 12.7 x 1.5 x 20.3 cm
  • Average Customer Review: 3.8 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (13 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 250,683 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, and more.

Product Description

Review

A passionate, provocative and common sense challenge to easy cant. (The Observer)

Lucid, convincing and manifestly compassionate (Mary Warnock)

A book of morals for our brave new world, by a very wise man indeed. Inspiring. Fascinating. Full of hope (Fay Weldon)

This is a courageous book for a bishop to write, and everything it says about morality is right and true (Literary Review)

His conclusions are refreshing . . . a brave and scholarly book (Observer)

Book Description

A fascinating and thoughtful-provoking exploration of human morality from the Sunday Times bestselling author of Leaving Alexandria

Inside This Book (Learn More)
Browse Sample Pages
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt
Search inside this book:

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?

Customer Reviews

3.8 out of 5 stars
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

44 of 47 people found the following review helpful By A Customer on 20 July 2000
Format: Paperback
I had read perhaps about half way through this book before catching a glimpse of the inside of the back cover where it is revealed that the author is a bishop. This came as some surprise as the book appears to be a hugely convincing plea for secular humanism. The book covers a wide range of moral issues including sex and marriage, gay issues, ethical questions that arise from new technology, alcohol, tobacco and drug use and many others. The author covers these things with an immense amount of thought and wisdom, sometimes offering guidance and sometimes presenting the facts and letting the reader decide for him or herself. Altogether I find this to be a truly excellent book. Author Mary Warnock in her comments on the rear cover says "I enjoyed Godless Morality enormously and agreed with it almost totally." I don't think there is very much that I could add to that.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
19 of 21 people found the following review helpful By rick@hughes276.freeserve.co.uk on 25 Feb 2002
Format: Paperback
This book, for me, resonated the sign of the times. It is a text for all of us to question our own meaning of morality in our Western world. We live in a mainstream society where we seem to question so little of what happens in our world. This book made me realise we all have a responsibility to effect positive change in our world. I also found myself questioning Western commercial imperialisation - where 'seemingly' we HAVE to stamp our breed of 'democracy' on the world when in fact this denigrates and insults the essence of other cultures and religions. This book serves to applaud diversity of 'religion' in a way which values human life and breeds respect for humanity.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
21 of 24 people found the following review helpful By FandRB on 2 Jan 2007
Format: Paperback
The very fact that this book is written by the Bishop of Edinburgh only reinvorces the lack of necessity for God in a moral system. To quote Holloway "We either admit that God is, to some extent at least, a human construct that is subject to criticism and evolution, or we weld religion to unsustainable prejudices that guarantee its rejection for the best, not the worst of reasons, so that to abandon it becomes a virtuous act of revolt against an oppressive force that imprisons rather than liberates humanity."

This is a refreshing and well written book and in no sense is it a sermon, quite the opposite.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
7 of 8 people found the following review helpful By G. C. Hurrell on 28 April 2012
Format: Kindle Edition Verified Purchase
It seems to me that at the core of the distinction between a religious and a non-religious person is the concept of `purpose' for the universe. This is the reason that Darwin's theory of natural selection faced such opposition. Churchmen could accept the idea of an evolving creation, but not of a universe that simply 'is what it is.' One hundred and fifty years on, an increasing number of people are facing up to the prospect of an existentialist cosmos. Many others cannot do so.

Richard Holloway does a neat side step at the beginning of book by apparently supporting the existentialists. He demonstrates that most, if not all the tenets of religion are either unnecessary or necessarily wrong. Most important among these is the impossibility of any absolute truth. He argues that the human condition is not a struggle between right and wrong, but between two mutually exclusive rights. Religion is at best misguided and at worst dangerously oppressive, he seems to say.

But it soon becomes obvious that he is unable to concede the basic principle of purpose. Where traditional religious teachings are inadequate or simply wrong, Richard Holloway offers the unchallengeable explanation that we have misunderstood the enduring purpose of God for us.

The book appears, by its title to suggest that ethical human life is possible without the a priori existence of God. Richard Holloway is an honest, reflective liberal thinker, but it is quite clear that he personally does not believe it is possible.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
8 of 9 people found the following review helpful By Steven G. Ogden on 26 Dec 2010
Format: Paperback
The key to understanding Holloway's approach can be summed up by saying: the book is a rational and humane attempt to get away from the "and God said" kind of morality (divine command model). Holloway sets the scene for this by asking, "Do we have to be religious to be moral? Do we have to believe in God to be good?" Of course, the answer to both these questions is "no". But how he addresses them is the interesting part.
His thesis is that there are many contemporary moral dilemmas, which are not about right or wrong; but rather they bear witness to the existence of competing values or rival value systems. Subsequently, he argues for a "middle way". Above all else, Holloway has confidence in "the dynamic nature of humanity" to address these dilemmas. As the worldview, which previously underlined divine command models of ethical decision making, has little authority for people outside the church (as well as many others inside it). The divine command models were more concerned about sin and obedience, than resolving complex moral issues. He recognizes that all this contributes to "ethical confusion". To address these dilemmas constructively, a new kind of wisdom is required. This wisdom is the basis of a "non-religious ethic". This is a good book, which tackles bravely conventional approaches to ethical issues.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful By drh on 23 Mar 2013
Format: Kindle Edition Verified Purchase
I bought this short-ish book 'on spec' as a £0.99 Kindle 'Daily Deal'. I found it to be a good read, pleasantly written, very human, informative, with many good points made - a nice blend of personal anecdote and deeper musing. It contains much criticism of religions & churches, but also much sympathy to their current predicaments. The author, although personally seeped in the Christian religion, is definitely not blind to the many errors & falterings of the institutions & groups surrounding that religion (& others), whilst exhibiting a sincere Christian love for the individuals trying their best within those institutions. However, he is very aware that religious faith is diminishing (at least, in the West), & (whatever his own personal views) he needs to find a non-religious way of justifying moral positions to all those faith-ily-challenged others.

So, his main topic is to ask : how can morality be built without some form of supreme authority ? This clearly reflects the Bishop Emeritus's upbringing in a religious school & his subsequent devotion to the Christian church. He seems to think in terms of needing an absolute end-point (presumably outlined by God), which then feeds-back into the detail & progress of morality. To an atheist (agnostic?) such as myself, such an approach is invalid from the start, & it is anyway incomprehensible to the faith-diminished majority of the population. [ A more acceptable method might be to think in terms of simply making things better, rather than aiming for some infinite perfection. In short, rather than trying to find moral codes which might please *God*, let's just try to get some that please *us* somewhat more than the ones we've currently got.
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

Most Recent Customer Reviews



Feedback