The God Delusion [Hardcover]

 

 

Create your own review

An excellent book, very well-written and thoughtfully argued. Stimulating and challenging - at times scathing - but something which definitely propels one to delve deeper into the reasons for belief - or indeed lack of them.

Dawkins' central thesis seems to be that the evolutionary process of natural selection, as propounded by Darwin and bolstered by the amalgamation of much subsequent indicatory evidence, provides a viable and real alternative to the "God Hypothesis" - indeed it blows it out of the water. But, why then - if blatantly false - is religion so ubiquitous? Evoking theories of evolutionary psychology and the human need for consolation and meaning (as well as the scientific ignorance of our ancestors), Dawkins explains the popularity of religion in purely secular terms.

But what, then, about morality? How can we derive our principles of right and wrong if not from an absolute source of incontrovertible authority (God / revelation)? Again Dawkins responds by explaining how the roots of morality have Darwinian origins and includes a chapter on how the moral lessons of traditional religion (quoting biblical scripture, although I suspect his treatment of the Quran or other sacred texts would be equally unsympathetic) are not that endearing anyway. Why be so hostile though - isn't religion a good thing, a quaint yet harmless cultural phenomenon? Well no, look at the fundamentalists, terrorists, homophobes and other fanatics being spawned by the religious project in increasingly large numbers. Dawkins is unequivocal: religion is dangerous and we need to protect ourselves from it.

So what's the solution, what do we do? Simple, answers Richard with customary gusto: take a strong dose of courage followed by an even stronger one of rationalism, then cast off these restrictive fetters we've inherited from childhood. Grow up, for God's sake (no pun intended), and breathe the fresh, fragrant air of twenty first century scientific freedom! Our experiments have revealed, after all, that there are no fairies at the bottom of the garden.

This, in a nutshell, is a synopsis of the book and something, I must say, I found to be an exhilarating read. I approached the book with an open mind, determined not to allow the predilections of my preconceptions taint my appreciation of his arguments, and was sufficiently enthused to write directly to the author (I await his response). It's always refreshing to have your beliefs challenged, and Dawkins is an expert at doing that. He also has a brilliant knack of reducing complex scientific content down to digestible chunks (peppered with generous offerings of very entertaining humour), and this adds considerably to the readability value of the text. It's not for nothing that Dawkins was the Charles Simonyi Professor for the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University, demonstrating his ability to explain - in simple terms - science to the layperson. Also worth pointing out is one of the key benefits of the book in the way in which it collates into a single place so many of the classic as well as modern arguments for belief versus disbelief, making it into a cutting-edge handbook for reference.

So what of the key questions the text raises? How can people of faith come to terms with the structured and forceful arguments outlined above? Can we marry faith with modern twenty first century scientific rationalism or are the two fundamentally incompatible, consigned to follow paths of mutually irreconcilable divergence?

I, for one, remain content with my faith as a Muslim after reading Dawkins' book. Although appreciating the validity of many of his arguments, and recognising the negative impact that extreme religion can have, I'm not convinced entirely by the argument for blind and random evolution. Too many holes exist for my liking, and a "leap of faith" is required similar to what the religious person must commit to. I also found his section on the "anthropic principle" to be singularly unconvincing. Cosmology and the origin of life is something science is still stabbing in the dark at (although Dawkins says he has "faith" the answer will be found as the discoveries of science continue). I choose to have faith that the answer has been given to us, whilst fully respecting those who choose to disagree. Ultimately, it's the personal prerogative of each individual to forge an understanding of existence unique to them, whether buttressed by an accepted world-view or not. Dawkins challenges and stimulates us into believing that there is nothing outside of ourselves - we are the sum and substance of billions of years of chance occurrences and all supra-natural entities our ancestors believed in are nothing but the fictions of human imagination. What we choose to believe, though, is our individual and independent choice.

This book is my bible. It represents all the arguments I would wish to call my own. I am forever indebted to Dawkins for having the courage to question the privileged position that we award to religion in intellectual discussions. Criticism of religion should be no different to criticising one's choice of political allegiance.

Dawkins leaves no stone unturned in attending to the ludicrous, illogical, populous arguments that religious communities throughout the world use as ammunition against rational, intelligent atheists.

The other reviews of this book demonstrate what a touchy subject this is! Whatever your views I would recommend reading this book. It's fluent, well argued and engaging - although he is sometimes so angered by religious people that the fury starts to seep through and you can sense his knuckles whitening on the pen.

As with many theses the nuggets are sometimes tucked away. He casually reflects at one point how "believers" are actually atheistic about many gods (Apollo, Ra, Vishnu, Odin etc) - they dismiss almost as many gods as he does.

His scale of believing/not believing is interesting too: this isn't just a case of yes or no, there are many graduations on the way through - so, which are you? Quite atheistic but vaguely think there might be a God? Find out where you are on this handy, easy-to-read scale!

Seriously: this is a book that puts religious belief into perspective. If you are fifty like me, Christianity was probably a big part of your childhood education, and you challenged it at your peril. Like everything else your teachers believed in (corporal punishment, fair play, fitness, mind/body balance) in later life you have to assess the value of those ideas. Are you going to try to pass them on to your children? Are you sure that's right?

My tip - don't read the intro when you start: it's the angriest chapter, as it recounts the polemical (and sometimes downright horrid) attacks which have been made on Dawkins about the subject, so he's cross.

My own beliefs? Why should you care! This is an amazon review. It's about the book and whether it's worth reading. Enough with the ranting already.

Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review

› See all 986 customer reviews on Amazon.co.uk

 

2.0 out of 5 stars Philosophy of Religion not Science
The method of science does not really lend itself to such a question as the existence of God. If you are interested in the question of God's existence it is better to read a... Read more

Published 9 days ago by Steve

5.0 out of 5 stars The God Delusion
I was born into a Christian family but I didn't get married in church nor did I have my chilodren christened. Read more

Published 11 days ago by Dana Taylor

4.0 out of 5 stars The God Delusion
If Dawkins is to be regarded as the Messiah of atheism, I should be ashamed to call myself an atheist. Read more

Published 15 days ago by Grace Mansfield

2.0 out of 5 stars Well written, but extremely badly argued.
This book doesn't really need another review - it has over a thousand. However, I'm going to write one anyway from the point of view of an atheist and philosophy student who is... Read more

Published 22 days ago by T. Blackburn

1.0 out of 5 stars the most overrated book in history!
this has to be the most overrated book in the history of humanity. the first time i read it was in a week ago. Read more

Published 1 month ago by bookworm

5.0 out of 5 stars Iconic and icon blasting
This is the first Dawkins volume I have read and I was overwhelmingly impressed. His arguments are sound, well-researched and supported by lots of evidence. Eminently readable too.

Published 1 month ago by W.Spicer

4.0 out of 5 stars A great book, but a bit of a slog in the middle
After reading a sample of the reviews written here (both positive and negative) I have felt that a lot of people have talked about what is "in" this book, or what this book is... Read more

Published 1 month ago by D. Lu

5.0 out of 5 stars A book to read
Whatever our faith or belief in something is, this book dispels and strengthens the convictions we held before. Read more

Published 1 month ago by Mikhail

3.0 out of 5 stars Quite interesting, but with major flaws
This book is very interesting, and stands as a highly credible and coherent critique of religion, the value we place upon it, and the unthinking - and, it seems, undeserved -... Read more

Published 1 month ago by Boggers

5.0 out of 5 stars awesome
Richard Dawkins is an awesome writer. He totally proves god is a delusion. No theist has been able to prove him wrong. Read more

Published 1 month ago by Armand

Search Customer Reviews
Only search this product's reviews

› See all 986 customer reviews on Amazon.co.uk

Search Listmania!