Sign in to turn on 1-Click ordering.
More Buying Choices
Have one to sell? Sell yours here
Sorry, this item is not available in
Image not available for
Image not available

Tell the Publisher!
Id like to read this book on Kindle

Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.

Given Time: Counterfeit Money v.1: Counterfeit Money Vol 1 [Paperback]


RRP: 19.50
Price: 19.29 & FREE Delivery in the UK. Details
You Save: 0.21 (1%)
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
Only 2 left in stock (more on the way).
Dispatched from and sold by Amazon. Gift-wrap available.
Want it Tuesday, 22 April? Choose Express delivery at checkout. Details


Amazon Price New from Used from
Hardcover --  
Paperback 19.29  
Amazon.co.uk Trade-In Store
Did you know you can use your mobile to trade in your unwanted books for an Amazon.co.uk Gift Card to spend on the things you want? Visit the Books Trade-In Store for more details or check out the Trade-In Amazon Mobile App Guidelines on how to trade in using a smartphone. Learn more.

Book Description

1 Jun 1994
Is "giving" possible? Is it possible to give without immediately entering into a circle of exchange that turns the gift into a debt to be returned? This question leads Jacques Derrida to make out an irresolvable paradox at what seems the most fundamental level of the gift's meaning: for the gift to be received as a gift, it must not appear as such, since its mere appearance as gift puts it in the cycle of repayment and debt.Derrida reads the relation of time to gift through a number of texts: Heidegger's "Time and Being, " Mauss's "The Gift, " as well as essays by Benveniste and Levi-Strauss that assume Mauss's legacy. It is, however, a short tale by Baudelaire, "Counterfeit Money, " that guides Derrida's analyses throughout. At stake in his reading of the tale, to which the second half of this book is devoted, are the conditions of gift and forgiveness as essentially bound up with the movement of dissemination, a concept that Derrida has been working out for many years. For both readers of Baudelaire and students of literary theory, this work will prove indispensable.

Frequently Bought Together

Given Time: Counterfeit Money v.1: Counterfeit Money Vol 1 + The Gift: Forms and Functions of Exchange in Archaic Societies
Buy the selected items together

Product details

More About the Authors

Discover books, learn about writers, and more.

Inside This Book (Learn More)
First Sentence
The King takes all my time; I give the rest to Saint-Cyr, to whom I would like to give all. Read the first page
Explore More
Browse Sample Pages
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Back Cover
Search inside this book:

Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store

If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store. Learn more

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?

Customer Reviews

There are no customer reviews yet on Amazon.co.uk.
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)
Amazon.com: 4.2 out of 5 stars  5 reviews
18 of 20 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars A matrix of Derrida's early programmatic texts and thought 28 Oct 2003
By Peter - Published on Amazon.com
If there could be such a thing as a text that 'exemplifies' Derrida's thought, one that meticulously and clearly explains the strategies of 'deconstruction,' while at the same time distilling not just its own theory, but also producing a critical reading of several other prominent thinkers and their texts (and one that of course demonstrates the practical ends of the exposé of his theory), then "Given Time" ("Donner le temps") would unequivocally be that book. It is that good. In fact, it is superb. For those who have read Derrida's texts of the late 60s and early 70s, and know where they stand regarding Derrida's ideas, this book acts like a kind of overview or survey of his thought, a matrix or map of his thought, an architectural plan, even a game plan.

The primary text is a story by Baudelaire, and Derrida uses this two-page story to explicate the relations he has with his own masters, the lessons learned and the major points that he has taken from them and transformed. Husserl on the notion of the gift and the necessity to zigzag (a "Zick-Zack" or "mouvement en vrille") between bound and free idealities; Heidegger on being and temporality and the impossibility of appropriation or presence; Bataille on excess. All through a refreshing reading of Baudelaire's story together with Mauss' seminal essay from 1923 "The Gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies" (often considered the most influential work of anthropology, focusing on the social customs of exchange and the obligation to reciprocate) which conceives of a total social fact of gifting that Bataille had himself begun to unhinge in his 1949 "The Accursed Share" by implicitly laying waste to Hegel's philosophical economy - a multivolume work that was itself greatly influenced by "The Gift."

From a map of thought to Derrida's Joycean world
"Given Time" is a brief treatise on the layered notions of the 'gift' in several important works (in Husserl, it means what is given to us in the world through the 'immediate experience' of our senses; in Husserl's phenomenological reduction or "epoche" what is intended is separated from what is given. Derrida, in his earliest critical works on Husserl, analyzes the conceptual foundations of the intuition/intention relationship, and while he critiques Husserl's formal limits of the two, he maintains that the "epoche" is indispensable for transcendental phenomenology and for his own work. However, via Heidegger, Derrida will insist that in every act of being given there remains by necessity an aspect of the gift that holds itself back, is not given, and that gives nothing - the flipside of giving, as Deleuze noted, is theft. This temporizing aspect of the gift is reflected in Derrida's title "Given Time"). Derrida's thesis is that giving is only possible through a splintered 'time' of originary difference, which produces a doubling-effect of the notion of the 'origin,' and which means that the only possibility of authenticity will always be that of inauthenticity, which doubles and splits the difference. In other words, contamination occurs between the concepts of authenticity and inauthenticity: authenticity is impossible without the possibility of inauthenticity. Much like all 'counterfeit money' (which is also the title of Baudelaire's story) you can't tell whether the coin is or isn't truly money that you can buy a commodity with and truly possess something. Is it or isn't it fake? It's a split decision that Derrida patiently explores the 'logic' of. (By the way, art historian Georges Didi-Huberman has written a wonderful book, "Phasmes" (1990), partially translated as "The Phasmid," on deception and pretending; search for it on the net.) This important concept, which also runs throughout Deleuze's work, is a term he calls "the power of the false." But to give credit where it is due, it comes first of all in Heidegger's critique of his own project of a fundamental ontology (very arguably, to my mind) in Section 72 of "The Fundamental Concepts of Metaphysics," where he speaks of the assertive logos as "false," "deceptive," and "pretending," and discusses the as-structure that will be so crucial for all of Derrida's work - in fact his explication of the true/false pair in "Given Time" explains this operative concept of 'relation' without naming it. 'Relation' is one of the most important concepts in Derrida's thought, and he explicates it at length in "Given Time." Derrida shows how there is indeed a beyond to the binary couple of truth and falsity, authenticity and inauthenticity, by exploring a catachresis that simultaneously surpasses each of them (suggesting that they are impossibly pure concepts, as each implies the other as its limit) but that also makes their 'false' opposition possible (and that they must therefore mix or contaminate each other). Derrida has given many strategic names to this notion, such as originary difference or différance (which Leonard Lawlor has suggested is Derrida's reinscription of Husserl's notion of intention). This relation of possibility to impossibility is very clearly laid out in "Given Time" ("on one hand"..."on the other hand"), and gives the reader a penetrating insight into the importance that Derrida ascribes here and throughout his work - especially his more recent works "Aporias" (another very clear book of his, and highly recommended), "The Politics of Friendship" and "Cosmopolitanism and Forgiveness" - to the counter-intuitive and non-oppositional relationship between impossibility and possibility (which is an important redrawing of Kant's condition of possibility and the notion of 'limit' and critique).

Also, one can read the entire book as a long commentary on capitalism, one which places Marxian thinkers in an uncomfortable position and that tries to think through capitalism a little bit further from within 'deconstruction': Derrida's most overt attempts at this are 'From restrictive to general economy' of 1966 (a superb essay with a very pretentious title that plays on Einstein's 1905 and 1916 Nobel-prize earning work "Special [aka "Restricted"] and General Theory of Relativity" - although his 1921 Nobel was technically awarded for his "contribution to photoelectrics") and "Specters of Marx," from 1994, with a title that's cribbed from his mentor and colleague Louis Althusser's book "Specters of Hegel" as an homage. One also has to remember that this book was originally a lecture course from c. 1979. Derrida is of course using transcendental phenomenology as the guiding thread to discuss literature and sociology, and makes something really interesting occur in each, along with modifying our concept of capitalism. From anywhere you stand you can see Derrida's French qualities: literature, anthropology, the belief that philosophy has to engage with capitalism if it is to be considered at all relevant. All are relevant to deconstruction, and are considered game for being folded into it, so long as they take you somewhere else, produce different thoughts regarding the world we inhabit, and permit these thoughts to be formalized.

There is no other book written by Derrida that lays out the material and the method so clearly and patiently (although again, "Aporias" is highly recommended). It does assume familiarity with his earliest programmatic works. If one looks at pp. 71-75 of Derrida's brief and incisive "Introduction to Husserl's Origin of Geometry," for example, one glimpses the thematic affinity between that earlier, more programmatic work, and how Derrida's conclusions there are extended in multiple and different directions in "Given Time" (those pages discuss the troubled constitution of ideal objects and how they can always be false and inauthentic in their expression. If Derrida chooses a work of fiction by Baudelaire on counterfeit money, it is in part because all truth must pass through fiction, or to put it differently, the necessary possibility of inauthenticity).

In sum, this is one of Derrida's most elegant and accessible treatises on his own philosophy and how its relations extend to other modes of thought that on the one hand he himself is influenced by, and on the other hand he radicalizes as he engages them. It is a book that thoroughly transforms the interrelated concepts of the gift that exist in separate disciplines - not least of which is philosophy, which is often said to have 'begun' in wonder or amazement at the world and what is supposedly simply presented or given to us. Derrida takes a critical step back (à la Husserl's method of "rückfragen," that attempts to account for the structuring of tradition) to explore how this presencing comes about, and how the 'there is' (es gibt, in German) appears, and then goes a step further to explain how we relate in our everyday, societal lives via an uncanny and counter-intuitive 'structure' or 'logic' (as well as mediated 'experiences') of giving and receiving, and how these open onto the issues of responding responsibly (which is a theme that Derrida explicitly explores in his works on forgiveness and on hospitality).

As to the translation, which is polished and luminous, it is one of the best translations of Derrida's work into English.
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Given Time 26 Feb 2013
By eric j. sandberg - Published on Amazon.com
Format:Paperback|Verified Purchase
Given time, I would love to write an extensive explication of this text. Life being too short, I will forego the urge. A phrase begins to accrue to Derrida, "not for the faint of heart" and "Given Time" qualifies. It's not for the faint -- is it feint? -- of heart. What it is is an exploration of being in terms of the Heideggerean "it gives." Being [not beings] isn't. It escapes the question of "What is?" Heidegger notes that the German phrase for 'there is' is 'es gibt' or 'it gives.' and explores the idea of whether 'being' might 'give.' He does so without much analysis of what 'give' might mean. Enter Derrida. Couple to Heidegger's exploration the Heideggerean understanding the 'time' is at ground of being and you come to Derrida's position of what 'being gives' can mean as 'time gives,' and this with variation of formulation. There is: Es gibt, Il y as, It/Id gives. Being gives. Time gives. Time gives Being. . . But what Derrida brings to the 'seance' is an examination of what 'gift' might mean principally through the text of Mauss, but not exclusively. The 'gesture' is pure Derrida. How might the understanding of gift in 'other' usage inform the ontological question? What did Johnson say about Shakespeare. "Read him." Suffice to say that if you work out the allegory of Madam Maintenant's (sic) letter, you'll be well under way to understanding this rather difficult text.

5.0 out of 5 stars Worth the effort 31 Jan 2014
By J. Pearl - Published on Amazon.com
Format:Paperback|Verified Purchase
Dense but outstanding analysis of the gift. I found the final sections to drag a bit, but still rightfully a classic in the field.
2 of 4 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Poetry? 2 Feb 2013
By Robert M. Koretsky - Published on Amazon.com
Format:Paperback|Verified Purchase
I read the comment on this book that called it "deconstructionist wool gathering", and after butting my head up against some of the tracts in it, I can see where that reviewer is coming from. Basically I'm reading Given Time to trace a thread of explication from Boas, Mauss, Bataille, Baudrillard through Christopher Bracken( "Potlatch Papers", "Magical Criticism"). I want to understand and assimilate those people's ideas into my own developing political and cultural thought in order to understand what Christopher Bracken is talking about. For me, if it has to be through Derrida, Hegel, Heidegger etc., I'm willing to do the "homework". Fundamentally, I do have a dilettante's interest in anthropology of the 21st century.
All this does have another pragmatic end, I'm just tired of the dead-ended revolutionary rhetoric and discourses that have been taken off the shelf at the museum, dusted slightly, and reused by the Occupy Movement here in the 21st century. The last time I visited the Occupy headquarters here in Portland, Oregon, it was like going into a museum of revolution. All the obsolete grand narratives, you know, like Marx, political economy, on and on.
Maybe there's a more valid and potent approach to be found in tracing the thread I describe above to arrive at a fresh political outlook, for me at least.
So, my advice: read this book like poetry- it's precious, esoteric, and abstract, with some lucid and salient points made at various junctures. This may be a very synoptic distillation of Derrida and his writing at a point in time, but to tell you the God's honest truth, I can't formulate a summary statement of him after reading this book. But after all, I'm not really interested in doing that. If he feels he's incomprehensible, what the hell am I supposed to say about it, try to make sense out of his incomprehensibility?
5 of 75 people found the following review helpful
1.0 out of 5 stars Typical Deconstructionist Wool-Gathering 27 Aug 2003
By Ookie Cookie - Published on Amazon.com
Derrida here engages in his usual word-games and cute metaphores, and the result is pointless and nearly incomprehensible, as usual. How exactly is human knowledge furthered in a positive and valuable way by saying things like "The title of the text is the title (without title) of the text"? Nothing but meaningless verbiage...
Were these reviews helpful?   Let us know

Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
First post:
Prompts for sign-in

Search Customer Discussions
Search all Amazon discussions

Look for similar items by category