I couldn't warm to this book, for two reasons. Firstly, it's the sort of book that reviewers love, because it's about a writer. Correction, it's about Gertrude Stein, who thought she could write, and her amanuensis Alice, who typed up her repetitive compositions. Alice thought Gertrude was a genius, because when she first saw her bells went off inside her head. The same phenomenom occurred when she met Picasso. Had she realised they were alarm bells she might have saved everybody a lot of trouble. Instead Pablo was encouraged by Gertrude, and Gertrude was encouraged by Alice.
Leo Stein, Gertrude's brother, was far more clearsighted. He had some appreciation of art, and called both their efforts "Godalmighty rubbish" and "Cubico futuristic tommy-rotting". If only his judgement had prevailed. Instead Alice encouraged Gertrude to persist in her delusion, despite repeated rejections from prospective publishers whose job it was to make sound commercial judgements.
Boiling it all down, this is a book about two ladies who tried hard to make a success of writing, and failed. Not on the face of it promising material, but it could have been redeemed had Diana Souhami written a compelling narrative. Instead of which, one is subjected to a tedious prose, in which irrelevant details are scattered (one lunch attendee is described as having had double-jointed thumbs), but there is an irritating vagueness about the relationships between the principal characters.
In fact, the funniest part of the book (and, despite what the reviewers write, a barrel of laughs it ain't) is when Mr Fifield, of Clifford's Inn, London returned the 147-page manuscript of "Portraits" with a covering letter hoisting Gertrude on her own petard by mimicking her impenetrable prose, but far more wittily than she was capable of herself. If like me you've been misled into purchasing this Tale of Two Mittys, my advice is simply to read and enjoy page 148, it will save an awful lot of time.