This is the kind of book I have for years dreamed of finding, and had almost despaired of finding. Authors are usually so fond of their own knowledge they are afraid to put their opinions on the line, and resort to empirical learning to filibuster from beginning to end.
"George Inness was born on ... educated in ... lived at ... painted ... and died at age ... in ..."
This author openly engages with the paintings and with the statements of the artist in just the way you and I would in conversation. Frequent references are made to the content of the paintings, the aims of the artist, the reason for inclusions of this or that, the effect of such inclusions on the viewer and the benefits on the overall effect of the painting. No hiding behind 'facts and figures' although the whole argument is firmly based in this reality.
Such a direct involvement with the art, the paintings and thus the reader leads to an engaging read and a learning process authors seldom permit the reader to enjoy.
This is not to say that the book is not intelligent and informative. It is, and delightfully taxing on what may be a new subject to some - Swedenborgianism. If the author herself is not a disciple, she does a wonderful job of directing an enlightening trail through what can be difficult ground.
But then much of Inness could be seen as difficult if not obtuse; he was not, he was just refreshingly different. So he could not have found a more suitable writer than this to put his case if he had had such a choice himself. A wonderful, informative and challenging read I shall return to time and time again.