George Enescu said of the octet, featured on this disc, that it was more like architectual design than composing. This can be heard in the connections he makes between the movements, which, although in a traditional 4-movement form, is really more like a single sonata form spread across those movements. The resulting unity is astonishing. The main theme is expressed in many ways through call-and-answer interactions between the string players, making it easy to get lost in the delightful playfulness of the piece. The result of eight parts in this octet is a little like the effects of multiple concussions to the head. Instead of 2+2=4, and 4+4=8, it sounds more like 2+2=7 or 8, and 2+2+2+2=not being able to count at all. This is one of the first major works he composed after his student years, and it is one of his first major successes. A great one.
The quintet is a later work, and a little bit more difficult to understand. Listeners will hear most readily the impressionistic influence, but there is much more to it than that. Like the octet, the quintet does not show as strong an influence of folk music as some of the composer's popular work does, but rather an incredibly detailed design. Many reviewers struggle to thoroughly describe this music. If you listen, you'll know why; it doesn't fit any preconceptions. One reviewer coined the term "Romantic Impressionism" to describe it. The Amazon reviewer sums it up as "Red Meat Faure." I like both, but hope listeners will agree with me that these descriptions indicate an inadequacy on our part. Just listen to it, and come to know it as the true Enescu, and nothing else. This is music that we should be judging other compositions by, not vice-versa. I agree with another reviewer in advocacy of repeat listenings to this work. Its not just pretty, not just interesting, it is profound.
Both of the works are beautiful, charming, charicteristic of the composer, and performed as such by Gidon Kremer and his fellow musicians. I wouldn't be the first in saying that anything he records will be worth listening to, and this is another case of his work shedding light on an unfairly neglected composer. This is recommended without reservation, but don't stop here. Enescu was a true master musician--his knowledge coming from all spheres of music: composing, performing (piano and violin), conducting, and teaching. Because his work was so spread out, he wasn't as prolific as many, but the works he left us should be cherished as much as any from the last century. Truly, his musical thoughts are as profound, if not moreso, than those of Stravinsky, Sibelius, Shostakovich, or Britten, to name a few. If you're unfamiliar with him, Kremer's disc is a great place to start.