Having stumbled on a newspaper review of Genesis Unveiled I had very much looked forward to getting stuck into it, but the repetitive use of 'moreover, 'prosaic' and 'in my view' made for a difficult read.
When I say 'moreover' is used repetitively, I do mean repetitively - it is used on no less than 6 occasions on one pair of pages alone ( 179 & 180 if I recall correctly ) and there are multiple instances of multiple, consecutive use. In fact, there is hardly a page without it. As for 'in my view', well, the author is the author so we know that. An editor is credited by the author but a thesaurus would have been a much better bet. Basic errors such as these should have been trapped prior to publication.
The work itself contains a tremendous of amount of detailed, well researched information and proverbial 'nuggets' are plenty, so there can be no criticism of the contents but what should have been a good read wasn't.
Another reviewer has commented about 'lazy readers' but a book that is 'hard to read' is, by definition, poorly written - it's as simple as that. And the blame for that lies fairly and squarely on the author / editor.
Barely six months after first publication and a revised edition is already required, along with a change of editor. Please revisit this work, Mr Lawton - so much good, nay, excellent content does not deserve to be spoiled by poor presentation. And it is.
What a shame.