| ||||||||||||||||||
 Trade In this Item for up to £0.25
Get an extra £5 when you trade in books worth £10 or more until June 30, 2012. Trade in Fundamentalism and the Word of God for an Amazon.co.uk gift card of up to £0.25, which you can then spend on millions of items across the site. Trade-in values may vary (terms apply). Find more products eligible for trade-in.
|
Frequently Bought Together
Product details
|
More About the Author
Inside This Book
(Learn More)
First Sentence
'FUNDAMENTALISM' has recently grown notorious. Read the first page
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index | Back Cover
'FUNDAMENTALISM' has recently grown notorious. Read the first page
Explore More
Concordance
Browse Sample PagesConcordance
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index | Back Cover
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|
Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store
If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store.
Learn more
What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?
Customer Reviews
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
4 of 4 people found the following review helpful
Format:Paperback
This classic is invaluable to all who want to understand and assess the view that the original Bible manuscripts were without error. It is as relevant today as it was 50 years ago, addressing objections that are popular again today. It is clear, concise, thorough and persuasive. It will be of particular help and encouragement to Christians who are struggling to articulate their faith in the authority of the Bible as God's Word.
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
Format:Paperback
Packer sets out Christianity as an authoritatively revealed religion, and thus sets it in opposition to those disfigured versions of the faith which lack the essential recognition of the divine inspiration and authority of the Christian Bible. He ably defends the view that belief in the ultimate inerrancy of Scripture is no warrant for anti-intellectualism and obscurantism, whilst also making clear that liberal, humanistic conceptions of the Christian faith in which spiritual truth is relativised to human subjective opinion differs absolutely from true Christianity as Christ and the Bible declare it. He thereby rescues 'fundamentalism' from its anti-intellectual reactions to theological liberalism, whilst thoroughly exposing the latter as a total departure from authentic Christianity into various forms of sub-Christian relativism dressed up in Christian language.
Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)
Amazon.com:
6 reviews
12 of 13 people found the following review helpful
Perhaps Oudated, But Solid
24 Dec 2003
Format:Paperback
JI Packer wrote this book over 45 years ago. Some of the issues he addresses are not issues today. But the premise behind the book is timeless- the authority of the Word of God. Even though liberalism may not be as strong as it was 50 years ago, today Christendom is wandering farther and farther away from the authority of God?s Word. This fact can be seen in the growth of cults. It can also be seen in how Christians today depend on human authors instead of God?s Word. Yet another manifestation of this wrong notion is the branch of Christianity that replaces God?s Word with emotion and feelings. So though the issue of Liberalism may not be significant today, the issue of authority definitely is.
I read the book for a class on ?The History of Fundamentalism in America?. The book does not really trace the history of Fundamentalism, but the book does cover the central issue in the Fundamentalism/Liberalism debate. Before reading the book, I would suggest reading the first two pages of the conclusion, where the author gives an overview of the entire book. The book is very logically laid out, with each chapter subject building on top of the last chapter subject. The only chapter I had problems with was the chapter on faith. The author tries to explain man?s inability to express faith, showing the author?s reformed presuppositions. I didn?t understand how this tied into the argument and flow of the book, and I think the notion is unbiblical (but this is a discussion for a different book review). The main argument of the book was one of presuppositions (as found in presuppositional apologetics). On page 109 the author writes, ?We should not abandon faith in anything that God has taught us merely because we cannot solve all the problems which it raises. Our own intellectual competence is not the test and measure of divine truth. It is not for us to stop believing because we lack understanding, or to postpone believing till we can get understanding, but to believe in order that we may understand?? This is the core issue of authority- are we going to trust our own minds, or are we going to trust God?s Word?
I would recommend the book to any Christian. The book will challenge you to take on a stronger stance for the Word of God, and it will show the foolishness of doing otherwise.
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful
Standard Resource for Christians
27 Oct 2008
Format:Paperback
Solid, dependable but dated exposition of the original Fundamentalist position (ala Machen) before the term got stolen and mis-apportioned to a more narrow sect within the Christian community. Packer clearly states that the term is not "useful for Evangelicals today" (1958) and he was and is right. The book is well worth reading, along with Machen's "Christianity and Liberalism" for a strong sense of the basic challenges orthodox, Evangelical Christians face. In the post-modern era those basic challenges are still present though now characterized in different dress. As Packer says (pg. 42)- "The problem of authority is the most fundamental problem that the Christian Church ever faces." Absolutely true and now as much as ever. Packer's work has abiding interest for anyone seeking to establish themselves within the flow of Christian apologetics and self-understanding.
4 of 5 people found the following review helpful
The Question Of Authority Still Divides People
25 Sep 2007
Format:Paperback
The fundamentalist movement began as a response to the rising liberalism of the 19th century, especially as found in the church. In contrast to the dictates and the wisdom of modern men stood Holy Scripture, which was to be the sole authority. That much they knew:
'The problem of authority is the most fundamental problem that the Christian Church ever faces.' p 42
But they also knew their convictions would not go unchallenged:
'Modern man, sceptical and indifferent as he is to dogmatic pronouncements about the supernatural order, may find it hard to take seriously the idea that one's eternal welfare may depend on what one believes; but the apostles were sure it was so. Theological error was to them a grim reality, as was the spiritual shipwreck which comes in its wake.' p 43
On the other hand, JI Packer also extends a historical reminder to those who err in thinking that J Gresham Machen was fundamentalist. 'He saw fundamentalism as a debased evangelicalism which at point after point was at variance with that for which he stood.' p 36 Packer quotes Machen's own analysis which shows that he could not resign himself to the fundamentalist position: 'The emergence of new emphases and the lack of others, the presence at times of a zeal not according to knowledge and the frequent absence of historical perspective...Oftentimes pietistic and perfectionist vagaries have come to be accepted as the hallmark of fundamentalism. And a one-sided other-worldliness, often associated with a dogmatic commitment to a futuristic chiliasm, has come to be widely regarded as essential to fundamentalist orthodoxy.'
Ned B Stonehouse, J. Gresham Machen: A Biographical Memoir pp. 336
'The problem of authority is the most fundamental problem that the Christian Church ever faces.' p 42
But they also knew their convictions would not go unchallenged:
'Modern man, sceptical and indifferent as he is to dogmatic pronouncements about the supernatural order, may find it hard to take seriously the idea that one's eternal welfare may depend on what one believes; but the apostles were sure it was so. Theological error was to them a grim reality, as was the spiritual shipwreck which comes in its wake.' p 43
On the other hand, JI Packer also extends a historical reminder to those who err in thinking that J Gresham Machen was fundamentalist. 'He saw fundamentalism as a debased evangelicalism which at point after point was at variance with that for which he stood.' p 36 Packer quotes Machen's own analysis which shows that he could not resign himself to the fundamentalist position: 'The emergence of new emphases and the lack of others, the presence at times of a zeal not according to knowledge and the frequent absence of historical perspective...Oftentimes pietistic and perfectionist vagaries have come to be accepted as the hallmark of fundamentalism. And a one-sided other-worldliness, often associated with a dogmatic commitment to a futuristic chiliasm, has come to be widely regarded as essential to fundamentalist orthodoxy.'
Ned B Stonehouse, J. Gresham Machen: A Biographical Memoir pp. 336
Were these reviews helpful?
Let us know
Customer Discussions
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|
Listmania!
Look for similar items by category
Look for similar items by subject
Feedback
- Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
- I am the Author, and I want to comment on my book.
- I am the Publisher, and I want to comment on this book.
|
