|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frequently Bought Together
Technical Details
- Disposable Camera Lens: without Lens
- Emulsion: Colour Negative
- Film Format: 135 mm
- Filmline: Fujifilm Superia
- Number of exposures: 36
- Pack Size: 1
- Pack Size (Units): 1
- Pack size: 1
- Professional Film: No
- Speed: 400
- Speed in ISO: 400
- Year of Introduction: 1997
- Year of introduction: 1997
Product details
|
Product Description
When you want a really fine-grained and natural-looking result under mixed daylight conditions, Superia 200 is the ideal choice. Equally excellent for people shots, capturing skin tones naturally and beautifully, Superia 200 delivers an image sharpness that many 100 ISO films find hard to equal.
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|
Customer Reviews
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
For general snapping away in non-demanding conditions, this film is about ideal. It's a great price, so you can afford to try out scenarios that you wouldn't want to test with expensive films.
Colours are pretty accurate. It's great for general use. Sometimes for example, using professional stuff like Fuji Reala 100 can work against you, because while it's great for portraits (Which is what it was intended for) it's not quite right for landscapes, or buildings. Because it's optimized for skin tones.
Fuji's Superia range on the other hand is a great all-round choice if you're just heading out for the day with your camera and you don't know what you're going to encounter.
Personally, I prefer Superia 400 Xtra, because I find the extra performance in marginal light to be worth the added cost, especially as there's really no difference in the grain for all practical purposes. Okay, if you look close enough you can see a slight difference, but you really have to try.
But then again, anyone who's that critical should be using Medium Format systems and not still messing about with 35mm.
In summary, Superia 200 is a great film for pretty much anything in good light. If you want slightly better, especially in marginal light, then pay the extra few pence and go for Superia Xtra 400. But you won't go far wrong with either really.
Colours are pretty accurate. It's great for general use. Sometimes for example, using professional stuff like Fuji Reala 100 can work against you, because while it's great for portraits (Which is what it was intended for) it's not quite right for landscapes, or buildings. Because it's optimized for skin tones.
Fuji's Superia range on the other hand is a great all-round choice if you're just heading out for the day with your camera and you don't know what you're going to encounter.
Personally, I prefer Superia 400 Xtra, because I find the extra performance in marginal light to be worth the added cost, especially as there's really no difference in the grain for all practical purposes. Okay, if you look close enough you can see a slight difference, but you really have to try.
But then again, anyone who's that critical should be using Medium Format systems and not still messing about with 35mm.
In summary, Superia 200 is a great film for pretty much anything in good light. If you want slightly better, especially in marginal light, then pay the extra few pence and go for Superia Xtra 400. But you won't go far wrong with either really.
1 of 3 people found the following review helpful
It only had 2-3 months left till expiry. If this time span is the norm then disregard this review. But I was expecting at least a year till expiry?
Customer Discussions
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|
Listmania!
|
|
Look for similar items by category
|
