For general snapping away in non-demanding conditions, this film is about ideal. It's a great price, so you can afford to try out scenarios that you wouldn't want to test with expensive films.
Colours are pretty accurate. It's great for general use. Sometimes for example, using professional stuff like Fuji Reala 100 can work against you, because while it's great for portraits (Which is what it was intended for) it's not quite right for landscapes, or buildings. Because it's optimized for skin tones.
Fuji's Superia range on the other hand is a great all-round choice if you're just heading out for the day with your camera and you don't know what you're going to encounter.
Personally, I prefer Superia 400 Xtra, because I find the extra performance in marginal light to be worth the added cost, especially as there's really no difference in the grain for all practical purposes. Okay, if you look close enough you can see a slight difference, but you really have to try.
But then again, anyone who's that critical should be using Medium Format systems and not still messing about with 35mm.
In summary, Superia 200 is a great film for pretty much anything in good light. If you want slightly better, especially in marginal light, then pay the extra few pence and go for Superia Xtra 400. But you won't go far wrong with either really.