From Here to Infinity: Scientific Horizons and over 2 million other books are available for Amazon Kindle . Learn more


or
Sign in to turn on 1-Click ordering.
More Buying Choices
Have one to sell? Sell yours here
Sorry, this item is not available in
Image not available for
Colour:
Image not available

 
Start reading From Here to Infinity on your Kindle in under a minute.

Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.

From Here to Infinity: Scientific Horizons (Reith Lectures 2010) [Paperback]

Martin Rees
3.7 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (3 customer reviews)
RRP: 7.99
Price: 6.36 & FREE Delivery in the UK on orders over 10. Details
You Save: 1.63 (20%)
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
Only 3 left in stock (more on the way).
Dispatched from and sold by Amazon. Gift-wrap available.
Want it tomorrow, 22 Aug.? Choose Express delivery at checkout. Details

Formats

Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle Edition 4.12  
Paperback 6.36  

Book Description

28 April 2011 Reith Lectures 2010
The BBC Radio 4 Reith Lectures were given in 2010 by the Astronomer Royal, Professor Martin Rees. In this expanded version of the lectures (doubled in length with new material) Martin Rees shows how important science will be to the global economies of the 21st century, to solving some of our apparently intractable problems and to understanding the risks that the world faces.Science is often seen as difficult or obscure, but some great scientists (like the author) are so clear that we can all understand it and participate in the great debates that should concern us all whether they are about swine flu, global warming, oil running out, or even space travel.In four dazzling chapters (plus introduction and conclusion) Martin Rees shows the pleasures and importance of science, warns all of us (including governments intent on cutting funding) why we must take science deadly seriously and why it apart from everything else it is so satisfying - one of humankind's greatest achievements.

Frequently Bought Together

From Here to Infinity: Scientific Horizons (Reith Lectures 2010) + Our Final Century: Will Civilisation Survive the Twenty-first Century?: Will the Human Race Survive the Twenty-first Century? + Just Six Numbers: The Deep Forces That Shape the Universe (SCIENCE MASTERS)
Price For All Three: 20.64

Buy the selected items together


Product details

  • Paperback: 160 pages
  • Publisher: Profile Books (28 April 2011)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 1846685036
  • ISBN-13: 978-1846685033
  • Product Dimensions: 12.9 x 19.8 cm
  • Average Customer Review: 3.7 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (3 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 529,012 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Product Description

Review

'Pithy explanation of the role of science in the global economy' --The Times

`An absorbing summation of the state of science today' --BBC Focus

Book Description

A pithy exploration of the place of science in the 21st century from one of the world's greatest scientists, now the winner of the Templeton Prize 2011

Inside This Book (Learn More)
Browse Sample Pages
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Back Cover
Search inside this book:


Customer Reviews

3.7 out of 5 stars
3.7 out of 5 stars
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Important 20 Mar 2013
By MMY
Format:Paperback|Verified Purchase
Here is a text which is easy to read and has the capacity to get one really to think about ourselves and our world. It breaks down limited, small-mindedness, helping one to see that progression in scientific explorations are treating us to great wonders of the world we live in its and unlimited open horizons. Easy to read; beneficial to think about - brings one to consider a much more open view of the world which one really needs to adopt if one is to have faith in the future and all our world offers - so much more to discover
Comment | 
Was this review helpful to you?
4.0 out of 5 stars A book that everyone should read 20 Oct 2013
By Giulia
Format:Kindle Edition|Verified Purchase
Rees really manages to engage both scientists and members of the public in his reflections about the future of science. Definitely a book to read.
Comment | 
Was this review helpful to you?
3 of 18 people found the following review helpful
By trini
Format:Paperback|Verified Purchase
This review is for the book written by Lord Martin Rees. (There happens to be another book with the same title). By the way, I have amended my first version of this review.

I was encouraged to read this book after I read a long article by Rees, entitled "Even a theory of everything has limits", in the (London) Daily Telegraph, 11 September 2012, which was by way of a puff for a TV programmed (3 one-hour episodes) to be presented by Stephen Hawking on the Discovery Channel, beginning on 13 September ('Stephen Hawking's Grand Design'). I found the Telegraph article quite difficult to follow. It largely reproduces, I discovered, the speech made by Rees when he was awarded the Templeton Prize in 2011.

In fact, the speech/article refer back to the series of 4 Reith lectures delivered by Rees in 2010 on BBC Radio 4, and the book 'From here to Infinity' is in turn an expanded version of the Reith lectures. The longer text of the book is far more comprehensible than the shortened versions in the speech/article.

The book (150 uncrowded pages) was a delight to read, in attractive well-spaced type, and in perfectly understandable plain English. And with much of what the author has to say, I am in complete agreement. He stresses the importance of the discoveries and applications of science since, say, Galileo and Newton, and with increasing speed in the 20th and early 21st centuries, in changing (and improving) the way we (and the world's populations in general) live. He stresses the need to update and propagate the knowledge of these scientific benefits, from primary school through to post-graduate research.
Read more ›
Was this review helpful to you?
Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)
Amazon.com: 4.0 out of 5 stars  3 reviews
5.0 out of 5 stars A continuation of ideas from "Our Final Century[?]", worthy of many Kindle "bookmarks" 23 Dec 2013
By Chad M - Published on Amazon.com
Format:Kindle Edition|Verified Purchase
The range and depth of this book constantly impressed me. This is the kind of book that makes one read more slowly and carefully than usual, as one frequently finds nuggets of wisdom but cannot predict where they will appear.

Among the topics are: a. the need for multi-decade R&D programs, and examples of serendipitous pay-offs; b. the clean energy challenge being as much as a way to counter rising fossil fuels prices as it is beneficial for the climate, but that energy R&D is far below biotech research spending; c. the author's opinion about a new generation of nuclear power; d. that the climate may "flip" suddenly, within a few decades; e. an inside look at the culture and cooperative nature of science.

Finally, Prof. Rees has the kind of impartial outlook, similar to Freeman Dyson, that is so valuable for readers. Given his accomplishments, it is wise for readers to re-consider their own ideas if they disagree. I would bet, however, that it is hard to have good faith disagreements with Prof. Rees' writings.

The real problem, however, is not that some people or groups with dogmatic positions on energy, climate, or biotech may disagree with his ideas, it's that they aren't even reading or hearing his books in the first place. Hopefully the accessibility and eloquence of his writing will reach larger audiences while there are still a few decades to meet the challenges of the 21st century. If his books, radio, and video calls for thought and action can't do the job, I'm not sure what will ...
1 of 2 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Loved it 19 Jan 2013
By Roland Gagne - Published on Amazon.com
Format:Kindle Edition|Verified Purchase
Excellent and perceptive view of our past and present - not masked by the usual use of complicated equations.
Good example of the saying what is clearily understood can be simply explained.
It helped that this was to be given as lectures to real audiences with several levels of scientific exposure.
Thank you Dr Rees!!
2 of 8 people found the following review helpful
2.0 out of 5 stars Cosmology and neo-Darwinism alone cannot provide a 'Grand Design' 19 Sep 2012
By trini - Published on Amazon.com
Format:Kindle Edition
This review is for the paperback edition of the book written by Lord Martin Rees. (There happens to be another book with the same title). I do not know if this exactly matches the kindle edition. By the way, I have amended my first version of this review.

I was encouraged to read this book after I read a long article by Rees, entitled "Even a theory of everything has limits", in the (London) Daily Telegraph, 11 September 2012, which was by way of a puff for a TV programmed (3 one-hour episodes) to be presented by Stephen Hawking on the Discovery Channel, beginning on 13 September ('Stephen Hawking's Grand Design'). I found the Telegraph article quite difficult to follow. It largely reproduces, I discovered, the speech made by Rees when he was awarded the Templeton Prize in 2011.

In fact, the speech/article refer back to the series of 4 Reith lectures delivered by Rees in 2010 on BBC Radio 4, and the book 'From here to Infinity' is in turn an expanded version of the Reith lectures. The longer text of the book is far more comprehensible than the shortened versions in the speech/article.

The book (150 uncrowded pages) was a delight to read, in attractive well-spaced type, and in perfectly understandable plain English. And with much of what the author has to say, I am in complete agreement. He stresses the importance of the discoveries and applications of science since, say, Galileo and Newton, and with increasing speed in the 20th and early 21st centuries, in changing (and improving) the way we (and the world's populations in general) live. He stresses the need to update and propagate the knowledge of these scientific benefits, from primary school through to post-graduate research.

He also gives space, as a thinking member of society, in what one may call a sociological role, to studying the role of science in face of the dangers faced by humanity right now, with a rapidly expanded and still-expanding human population, potential shortages of fossil fuels and the harm that even now their use may cause to the environment, notably through global warming and the acidification of the oceans, the need to find alternative energy sources, and the threat of the misuse of nuclear energy (which may well become economically essential) as a source of weapons of destruction not only in global but even in relatively localized wars. On all such issues Rees's calm and scholarly views and warnings are to be applauded.

One problem however (occurring confusingly in the Telegraph article, but more clearly dealt with in the separate chapters 1 and 3 in the book) is that Rees uses the `theory of everything' idea, aka The Grand Design, in two contexts within his overarching vision that `science' has to deal with `everything'. Some of the time `everything' means THIS universe in which we live and which modern science actually (though imperfectly) describes; but some of the time Rees takes it to include all the most (currently) far-fetched ideas of M-theory and multi-dimensional string theory and multiverses and the wildest visions not only of the cosmological community but of science fiction writers too: anything and everything MIGHT be possible in POSSIBLY ALREADY EXISTING or STILL-TO-COME or NEVER-TO-COME universes of which we now know absolutely nothing, and perhaps simply could never know or understand anything, but which some now-unthinkable post-human `rational' beings might be able to understand.

It seems to me that a `theory of everything' in `our' universe is a reasonable topic for research among the top echelon of biologists and cosmologists, but a `theory of everything' imaginable and unimaginable, which gets a lot of Rees's time, seems like a target too far.

In fact Rees tells us that even the search for a `limited-to-our-universe' Grand Design is of little interest to the vast majority of scientists. He says in the Telegraph article (closely repeated in the book, pages 88,89): " ... the Grand Design would be irrelevant to the 99 percent of scientists who are neither particle physicists nor cosmologists, and who are challenged by the baffling complexity of our everyday world. It may seem incongruous that scientists can make confident statements about remote galaxies, or about exotic sub-atomic particles, while being baffled about issues closer to hand - diet and disease, for instance. Yet even the smallest insects embody intricate structures that render them far more mysterious than atoms or stars".

So much for those studying `our' universe. For the most part they don't even look for its `Grand Design'.

But he ends his Telegraph article by writing: "Whether the really long-range future lies with organic post-humans or with intelligent machines is a matter for debate. But we would be anthropocentric to believe that all of science is within humanity's grasp, and that no enigmas will remain to challenge our descendants. There may be things that humans will never understand - but that doesn't mean that they will never be understood".

That's the field of study for those seeking a `Grand Design' in the second sense - the understanding of what is currently wholly unknown and perhaps even will always be non-existent. In the book, this is the subject of Chapter 3: "What We'll Never Know".

Conclusion
My overall verdict on Rees's interesting book is that it fails, because of what it omits, and which it cannot be excused for omitting.

It fails because Rees's vision, in seeking for a `Grand Design', a `Theory of Everything', never rises above the `hard' sciences of biology and chemistry and cosmology, above the microscope and the geological record and the laws of gravity and relativity and quantum mechanics. Do not be misled, because Rees repeatedly declares that he welcomes the beauty of the architecture and the chant and the ceremony of Ely Cathedral and the Anglican tradition, into thinking that Rees sees the Grand Design as including anything more than a better understanding of physical science. On page 92 he does say: "Understanding the brain - the most complicated thing we know about in the universe - is of course a supreme challenge". But even here Rees thinks only in terms of `scanning techniques' for the material brain. He does not rise to examining whether there is a distinction between the material brain and the immaterial mind (the `soul'?), a key distinction that is at the heart of what it means to be human.

An article by Mark Vernon in the (London) Guardian newspaper of 6 April, 2011 is headlined: "Martin Rees's Templeton Prize may mark a turning point in the `God wars'", making a considerable point of the fact that Rees strongly disapproves of Dawkins's aggressive attacks on religion, while Dawkins considers Rees to be a traitor and a turncoat to the cause of science and atheism, because he (Rees) declares that he appreciates his Anglican upbringing. Twice in his short article Vernon calls Rees an `atheist', and I have no reason to doubt this description.

Rees's analyses of the successes and the problems associated with science never transcend the purely material. His love for Ely cathedral and for his Anglican roots seems to imply that this transcends the material, but he never states this clearly. Dawkins and other atheists are equally capable of sharing such perceptions, but are equally unable - and indeed unwilling - to attempt to explain them by anything more than the action of the blind clashing of material atoms (e.g. Hawking) or the absurd `memes' of Dawkins. Rees says nothing.

Rees's and Hawking's books are necessarily failures, because they try to envisage a Grand Design but omit from serious consideration the huge reality which must be the central feature of any Grand Design: the self-conscious, understanding, rational, thinking, religious, scientific, logical, philosophizing, theologizing, artistic, musical, literary, remembering, planning, loving, hating, altruistic, selfish, moral, immoral, peak-of-creation human being. And they omit, disastrously, all philosophy and theology.

Rees warns us that our overall life-style, and the misuse of science, could lead this 21st century to destruction. He fails to consider another threat already destroying mankind, which is the destruction of the concept of rational human nature made in the image of God. Thus e.g. abortion.

I have much more to say on these matters, which I will add as `Comments' to this already long review.
Were these reviews helpful?   Let us know
Search Customer Reviews
Only search this product's reviews

Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 

Search Customer Discussions
Search all Amazon discussions
   


Look for similar items by category


Feedback