Free Speech: A Very Short Introduction and over 2 million other books are available for Amazon Kindle . Learn more

Sign in to turn on 1-Click ordering.
Trade in Yours
For a 1.13 Gift Card
Trade in
More Buying Choices
Have one to sell? Sell yours here
Sorry, this item is not available in
Image not available for
Image not available

Start reading Free Speech on your Kindle in under a minute.

Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.

Free Speech: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions) [Paperback]

Nigel Warburton
3.7 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (6 customer reviews)
RRP: 7.99
Price: 5.59 & FREE Delivery in the UK on orders over 10. Details
You Save: 2.40 (30%)
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
Only 3 left in stock (more on the way).
Dispatched from and sold by Amazon. Gift-wrap available.
Want it tomorrow, 2 Aug.? Choose Express delivery at checkout. Details


Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle Edition 4.12  
Paperback 5.59  
Trade In this Item for up to 1.13
Trade in Free Speech: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions) for an Amazon Gift Card of up to 1.13, which you can then spend on millions of items across the site. Trade-in values may vary (terms apply). Learn more

Book Description

26 Feb 2009 Very Short Introductions
'I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it' This slogan, attributed to Voltaire, is frequently quoted by defenders of free speech. Yet it is rare to find anyone prepared to defend all expression in every circumstance, especially if the views expressed incite violence. So where do the limits lie? What is the real value of free speech? Here, Nigel Warburton offers a concise guide to important questions facing modern society about the value and limits of free speech: Where should a civilized society draw the line? Should we be free to offend other people's religion? Are there good grounds for censoring pornography? Has the Internet changed everything? This Very Short Introduction is a thought-provoking, accessible, and up-to-date examination of the liberal assumption that free speech is worth preserving at any cost. ABOUT THE SERIES: The Very Short Introductions series from Oxford University Press contains hundreds of titles in almost every subject area. These pocket-sized books are the perfect way to get ahead in a new subject quickly. Our expert authors combine facts, analysis, perspective, new ideas, and enthusiasm to make interesting and challenging topics highly readable.

Frequently Bought Together

Free Speech: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions) + Censorship: A Beginner's Guide (Beginner's Guides) + Freedom of Speech
Price For All Three: 52.57

Buy the selected items together

Product details

  • Paperback: 128 pages
  • Publisher: OUP Oxford (26 Feb 2009)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0199232350
  • ISBN-13: 978-0199232352
  • Product Dimensions: 1.3 x 10.8 x 17 cm
  • Average Customer Review: 3.7 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (6 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 243,406 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
  • See Complete Table of Contents

More About the Author

Nigel Warburton (1962 - ). Nigel Warburton is a freelance philosopher and podcaster and bestselling author of several popular introductory Philosophy books including A Little History of Philosophy, Philosophy: The Basics, Thinking from A to Z, Philosophy: The Classics, Free Speech: A Very Short Introduction, Philosophy: Basic Readings, Freedom: An Introduction with Readings, and The Art Question. He has also co-edited two books based on his popular Philosophy podcast which he makes with David Edmonds 'Philosophy Bites'. On Twitter he his @philosophybites, and he runs the weblogs Virtual Philosopher and Art and Allusion. His other podcasts include Social Science Bites, Free Speech Bites, Everyday Philosophy, and Philosophy: The Classics - all available on iTunes.

Product Description


The genius of Nigel Warburton's Free Speech lies not only in its extraordinary clarity and incisiveness. Just as important is the way Warburton addresses freedom of speech - and attempts to stifle it - as an issue for the 21st century. More than ever, we need this book. Denis Dutton, University of Canterbury, New Zealand

Crisp, clear and astute, this is a thought-provoking introduction to one of the most hotly contested questions of our time. Lisa Appignanesi, President English PEN

Crisp, clear and astute, this is a thought-provoking introduction to one of the most hotly contested questions of our time. (Lisa Appignanesi, President English PEN )

About the Author

Nigel Warburton is Senior Lecturer in Philosophy at the Open University. He is the author of numerous books, including the bestselling Philosophy: the Basics (4th ed), Thinking from A to Z,Freedom: an Introduction with Readings, Philosophy: the Classics, The Art Question, and many more. He teaches courses on aesthetics for Tate Modern and regularly writes and broadcasts in the media on a range of topics, including running the popular Philosophy Bites podcast with David Edmonds.

Inside This Book (Learn More)
First Sentence
`I despise what you say, but will defend to the death your right to say it.' Read the first page
Browse Sample Pages
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index | Back Cover
Search inside this book:

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?

Customer Reviews

4 star
3 star
2 star
3.7 out of 5 stars
3.7 out of 5 stars
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful
By Dr. Bojan Tunguz TOP 500 REVIEWER
Freedom of speech is considered one of the most fundamental human freedoms, especially in modern liberal democracies. It has become de facto THE litmus test of overall freedom that citizens of any society enjoy. And yet, the notion that we should have this freedom is relatively recent. The modern understanding of this freedom can more or less be traced to John Stewart Mill's "On Liberty," although there have been acknowledgements of the importance of freedom of speech that precede that work.

This very short introduction covers some of those historical developments, but most of the book is dedicated to the contemporary controversies that surround various interpretations and limitations of the freedom of speech. In particular, the book deals with the famous quote of Oliver Wendell Holmes that freedom of speech does not entail falsely shouting "fire" in a crowded theatre and similar instances where speech can lead to physical or psychological harm. The book gives other examples of where our abstract notions of freedom of speech may collide with reality. The author is very good at appreciating the fact that the real world is very different from an academic discussion seminar, and many practical considerations oftentimes need to be taken into the account when deciding what should and should not be protected as free speech.

I find this book to be operating from a slight (perhaps unconscious) bias in its treatment of blasphemy and pornography. It seems to imply that religious and anti-religious "speech" (however one defines it) is really not categorically different from other forms of speech and ideas, while on the other hand the author is willing to concede that there is something categorically different when it comes to pornography.
Read more ›
Comment | 
Was this review helpful to you?
1.0 out of 5 stars Inaccuract Information - Did not Finish 31 May 2014
I cannot speak for the quality of the entire book, mind you as I did not intend to waste my time much past page 14, on which the author states that the UK does not have a Bill of Rights. I picked this book up precisely because of my dissertation research in which I'm examining the attitudes toward the 1689 Bill of Rights and the British constitution in the aftermath of the French Revolution and the legislation of the Two Acts in 1795, so to state out right that this bill does not exist leaves the author with very little credibility to be honest.

No, the 1689 Bill of Rights is not on par with the Declarations of Rights of Man in France or the Bill of Rights in the US constitution, but it remains a crucial part of the Revolution Settlement of 1688 and a foundation of the British mixed government, so to ignore it because it might make your argument somewhat more difficult seems problematic, irresponsible, and perhaps downright lazy.

He cites that in 2005, the UK forbid public protest within a certain amount of distance from the Houses of Parliament, something that would have been more difficult to do if the UK had a bill of rights. This is on page 15, which I struggled to get past as well. Does he think one can stroll up to the White House to protest without certain safeguards? That one can just protest on the steps of the Capitol without prior notice or proper permission?

After page 15, I put the book down. Icannot take you seriously if you do not intend to get the facts of history straight.
Comment | 
Was this review helpful to you?
6 of 10 people found the following review helpful
1.0 out of 5 stars My lips are sealed 19 April 2012
By opus
One might have expected from a book on the subject of Free Speech a vigorous defence of the concept, but the book seems to be an apology for intolerance and the justification of persecution - not that I am suggesting that Warburton ever intended to do that, but he is an academic, and intolerance seems to be the air academia breathes of any who dare to doubt the veracity of the currently favoured orthodoxies, and this book does not fail to toe the line. An Amazon review is not the place to take to pieces every thing that is wrong with this book - life and band-width are too short. Suffice to say I think he is wrong not merely morally but frequently in the historical basis of his judgements and on almost every page.

There are in the West now, various designated Victims. One may not under any circumstance say anything critical of such groups for that is Hate Speech. The very term posits its own judgement and begs the question. There is a pecking order of these alleged victims. Criticising, all others, is not merely acceptable but indeed encouraged.

Merely apply, by way of example, Mill's corn-grower argument to Tram-Girl (not of course that any right thinking person could ever for a second even partially support her obnoxious tirade against her fellow travellers) to see how in modern Britain the very reverse of Mill's example is the case; nor of course in the case of the Muamba Tweeter could anyone suggest that anything less than two months imprisonment for a momentary and drunken lapse of taste where the man deserved to be expelled from University (only two months before his finals) was anything less than entirely justified, even though Muamba himself never saw or could have seen the obnoxious tweet.

Had I had the misfortune to be a student at a seminar given by the author on this subject I would have walked (and I trust said something pertinent before doing so) before seeking a refund.

Mill must be turning in his grave.
Was this review helpful to you?
Would you like to see more reviews about this item?
Were these reviews helpful?   Let us know

Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
Should we have to subsidise political parties? 0 22 Nov 2011
See all discussions...  
Start a new discussion
First post:
Prompts for sign-in

Search Customer Discussions

Look for similar items by category