Most Helpful Customer Reviews
|
|
11 of 11 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
(Forgive me) Four-King Enjoyable Read, 20 Oct 2008
I share the first reviewer's scoring for this book, although not his affection for the brutal end of the sport. Rather, the history of boxing (like that of its poorer cousin, pro wrestliing, and its travelling companion, the mafia) fascinates me for sociological reasons. I agree that the author has omitted to choose his preference, but he's hinted at it by listing them Leonard, Hagler, Hearns, Duran and I'd guess this matches the public perception, with SRL at the head due to his show-biz image and the rest in that sequence due to the results of high-profile contests among the four. I personally favour Hagler, who first caught my attention by thrashing the evidently-overrated A. Minter, and Hearns, who upset me late on by beating the quiety capable Dennis Andries. Each line of this book drips with detail, and you could argue that the author is simply thumbing through results in Ring magazine except that asides and qualifications confirm that he's "been there". While the switching back and forth between the four angle characters can be hard to keep up with -- and the incidental biogs of supporting characters even more so, so that I had to backtrack -- this amount of detail makes the book more "liveable". The author is also frank about the seamier side of the fight game, suicidally so with some attestations. A good read for anyone who enjoys evocative newsreel of this atmospheric sport. (Dave)
|
|
|
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Excellent..., 4 Feb 2009
I like how honest the author is. He doesn't pander to Ray Leonard like many of authors and journalists tend to. That is not to say Ray Leonard's skill and ability are overlooked by the author. Hearns, Hagler, Duran and Leonard are all treated equally and unbiasedly by the author.
My only "complaint" (without wishing to sound like a 9 year old boy) was I would have liked more photographs of the pugilists.
I would recommend this book to anyone interested in the period of boxing, it really is excellently written, many insightful comments and completely without prejudice to any of the four legends.
|
|
|
0 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Solid reading for the pugilists, 13 May 2009
What strikes me these days is there are no true showmen in the ring anymore, gone are the days when you watched a fight to see a boxer truly batter someone about the ring, getting their fist in at every opportunity - it's more stand back and protect your head. Sure it's never nice to see someone taking a good fist and to see their eye bleeding, but that is the reality. For me, no class is more appealing to watch than around the middle weight - speed, deftness, agility - all great attributes associated with the best boxers. The author has chosen (in my mind) the best and most colourful boxers in history, from the untouchable Sugar Ray to the gritty Hearns and the awesome Marvelous Marvin. If there is one gripe I have that is there should be a conclusion as to which one the author deems to be the real king as, never mind going by four kings, I think he'd be better off by one king.
I'd say a good bit of reference material, but nothing quite beats seeing someone getting a good pounding in the ring and for that, I have my video collection.
|
|
|
Most Recent Customer Reviews
|