[Later note: "The Longevity Project" by Friedman and Martin is a groundbreaking overview of an 80-year study about what is really directly linked to happiness and health. Don't miss!]
Seligman was the first to move psychology from focusing exhaustively on what's wrong to looking at what's right. And that changed everything.
That change of focus may seem obvious now but it was actually a stroke of genius because it's hard - almost impossible - to create good from bad. Could anyone learn to play a musical instrument well from bad musicians, for example? However, given psychology's obsession up until then on what was wrong, Seligman's amazing accomplishment - creating an important branch that studies what is right - is akin to an instant U-turn by Allure of the Seas, currently the world's largest cruise ship (the size of a city block 16 floors high).
"Flourish" is not a repeat of his previous books as some appear to claim. Actually it represents Seligman's rejection of happiness as THE measurement of what's right. He explains this at length here but the essence seems to be that he has recognised the shallowness of measuring happiness, especially since it is so subjective but also because mood plays such a large part in happiness. He now argues that well-being is far more important.
Why only three stars? I felt there was really only a booklet worth of value in this book which, like so many written by academics (whose jobs can require them to "publish or die"), has a lot of "filler" (which can be entertaining if in the right mood for it). I scanned through this book to get the bones, the few gems of wisdom, which can probably be summarised by his definition, in an early chapter, of the five elements of well-being which are:
1. positive emotion (the pleasant life - subjective and coincidentally also important for happiness),
2. engagement (also subjective, and perhaps best explained by what Cziksentmihalyi calls Flow),
3. meaning (oddly, Seligman did not address purpose, which seems related),
4. positive relationships (other people), and
5. accomplishment (both accomplishment in its momentary form, and the "achieving life," a life dedicated to accomplishment for the sake of accomplishment, in its extended form).
There are a few practical activities recommended in this book, among them kindness (numerous small acts of giving, using your time to help others and not just giving away money) and the What-Went-Well Exercise (also called "Three Blessings"). (Doing three random acts of kindness daily (even the smallest, like smiling at someone) is guaranteed to make you more joyful within 3 weeks. How easy is that?!) For more on kindness, I recommend "Why Kindness Is Good for You" by David R. Hamilton (kindness is a way, not a thing).
Seligman explains the What-Went-Well Exercise by first acknowledging that sometimes it makes sense to analyse bad events so that we can learn from them and avoid them in the future. However, he says, people tend to spend more time thinking about what is bad in life than is helpful. Worse, this focus on negative events sets us up for anxiety and depression. One way to keep this from happening is to get better at thinking about and savouring what went well.
The Three Blessings exercise goes like this: Every night for the next week, set aside ten minutes before you go to sleep. Write down three things that went well today and why they went well. You may use a journal or your computer to write about the events, but it is important that you have a physical record of what you wrote. The three things need not be earthshaking in importance ("My husband picked up my favorite ice cream for dessert on the way home from work today"), but they can be important ("My sister just gave birth to a healthy baby boy"). Next to each positive event, answer the question "Why did this happen?" For example, if you wrote that your husband picked up ice cream, write "because my husband is really thoughtful sometimes" or whatever.
You don't have to read the book to see if you can benefit from this exercise. Try it for the next week. [see P.S. at end] Then choose to read this book, or not.
Thanks to Seligman, I've spent well over a decade exhaustively researching what's known about happiness. You might also want to take a look at my top four practical books on happiness:
1. "To Love is to be Happy With", a classic from the founder of the famous "Options Institute", where people can live the process explained in his book;
2. "Happy for No Reason" summarises the best of happiness research into easy-to-use steps, illustrated with inspiring stories of how very happy people have surmounted personal tragedies using these happiness processes and habits;
3. "The How of Happiness", an insider's distillation of happiness research, written by one of the most original and creative scientists within the field of happiness studies itself, sharing the secrets she has learned from rigorously conducted scientific studies; and
4. (for its detailed action steps that work well with "How")"Emotional Toolkit".
Apart from Seligman's new emphasis on well-being, nothing new (that is research-based) on happiness appears to have been published since these books although I can recommend McTaggart's "The Bond" emphasising the importance of relationships and "Positivity" by Fredrickson on the tipping point created by having 3 positive thoughts to every negative or neutral thought (each elaborates on different aspects already known and reported within the happiness field).
However, in the end, having worked on myself intensively by using many of the tips, techniques and tools that I have learned about over the last 15 years, I found that HEALTH is the biggest determinant of happiness. To me, happiness is directly linked to well-being - in the sense of being well. Yes, there are happy sick people but for most of us it is our basic constitution that controls our level of happiness. This is not exactly the same as the now-famous "happiness set point" because there are ways to improve basic health whereas it seems the set point is, well, set.
P.S. I hesitated about whether to add this but finally decided it would be the ethical choice: having tried the Three Blessings exercise for a week, I found myself increasingly upset about the minimal nature of the blessings I was able to scrape up. They were either of the petty/pitiful "spouse brought ice cream home" nature or something nice that had happened to a friend or relative. All this did for me - every day! - was highlight how pathetic was my life, or the exercise, it did not much matter to me, I found. As Ehrenreich comments in "Smile or Die", her diatribe against positive thinking/illusions (essentially self-hypnosis): By and large, most of us seem to have accepted positive thinking as a substitute for our former affluence and security. Yet it seems this infatuation has not made us happier.