I'm rated at about 1600 on ICC and often feel I have difficulty in creating a plan for the middle game. I bought this book thinking it might help me, but alas it was not helpful.
As someone else remarks, the first chapter. which is called "With the sources" is a historical overview. The first game is from the 15th century, where the play is so bad to be of no use whatsoever to ever bother reading the notes. So you might as well skip that chapter.
The second chapter of the book, which covers 14 pages, is called "Evaluating a position, Reference Points". This is the most useful chapter. In this, it considers 7 points to consider when analysing a position.
1) Material balance between the forces.
2) Presence of direct threats.
3) King safety
4) Possession of open lines
5) Pawn structure, weak and strong squares.
6) The center and space
7) Development of the position of pieces.
This second chapter then covers about 6 games, in only three of which the above 7 points are considered, along with a conclusion. I'll discuss forming a plan from the very first game, which is between two super GMs (Anand vs Karpov) is discussed. In my opinion the analysis is pretty hopeless and really does not teach one to create a plan. It might help a strong IM or less GM, but I doubt it. It certainly did not help me.
The analysis starts after move 12, at which point both side have a queen, bishop and rook which are not developed.
Points 1 (material), 2 (threats), 6 (centre) and 7 (development) are said to be all about equal in this Anand vs Karpov game. The discussion of the other 3 points contains less than 100 words in total. It really does not discuss the imbalances in the position in any detail. Without some understanding of the imbalances you can't make a plan.
Finally we get a general conclusion:
"The position is roughly equal. White has a slight advantage, as he can start an attack on the kingside sooner".
So that's the conclusion of this game. The less than 100 words about the imbalances and 20 word conclusion really does not help one understand why white can start this kingside attack, despite having 3 pieces undeveloped. Looking at the position, my plan would have been to develop the queen rook and bishop - starting a kingside attack would be the last thing on my mind.
The next couple of pages are an annotation of the game, where white plays two dubious moves and so Karpov wins. But I'm none the wiser about how this plan was formed. There's no discussion of alternative plans, and why they are inferior. Why was my plan of developing the other pieces inferior?
So basically this book does not help me form a plan, and as such I don't think the title matches the content.
Latter parts of the book are just annotated games - with even less discussion about how to form a plan.