I agree with all of the other reviewers comments. This is a great book to show that not all economists got it wrong. For earlier and on-going writings along these lines, see Michael Hudson's blog. I came across this in trying to find out where Paul Mason (BBC reporter and author of "Meltdown") was getting similar, but not quite complete, ideas concerning the economic origins of the crisis. That led me here, but for a deeper view of economics, see Michael Hudson's 1970ish doctoral thesis (now turned into a book "America's Protectionist Takeoff: 1815 to 1915") and his other books written in the early 1970's, and newer books. His on-going extensive blog gives up to date views you may not find elsewhere that center on the financialization disaster, dollar hegemony, and the importance of the balance of payments (not just trade deficit...this was his first job in the finance sector before). He seems a bit extreme at times, but he knows, and is ignored. Also look up "FIRE sector".
We use 40 times as much energy per person as we did in 1900 and the technology to utilize it has grown beyond all imagination. There is no theoretical reason why properly applied and improved classical political economy could not reduce our work week to 4 hours and eradicate poverty worldwide without little signs of resource limitation. Financialization that began in earnest with Reagan/Thatcher (listen to Paul Mason's, "radical economics part 2" BBC) has been a major blow to progress.
As Dr Hudson shows in his thesis, the America's Pershine Smith was not completely accepted here even as he was starting to get his economic thinking extremely correct, so he moved to Japan where the Meiji Government listened in earnest and is cited as one of the 2 great economic success stories in C. Owen Paepke's "Evolution of Progress".