Final Draft AV 2 (PC/Mac)Like many of my colleagues, I bought both Final Draft AV and Final Draft 8 because I needed a wide variety of industry-standard templates. But the whole could have been so much greater than the sum of these parts with more thought and effort.
As it stands, I think it's a poor choice for the professional. I've handled scripts for everything from TV news to corporate videos to games, so I'm looking at Final Draft AV 2 in a broad context.
The first question that struck me is why they bothered to have two separate products at all. Given the range of templates already in Final Draft 8 - from query letters to novels and full film scripts - I can't understand why they didn't just roll that up with the small number of two-column templates in the AV version and treat it as one write-anything app for a premium price. It would have been worth it for the extra functions in Final Draft 8 - like bookmarks, backup versions, and script compare - that could have been made available for AV documents.
AV will probably feel like hard going to anyone used to the average word processing application. Word and equivalent apps are an IT literacy standard, and most end users will have spent years working with that kind of interface. That has to be factored in when you design writing software; it's become a standard because it works. There are tools we all expect to have when we write.
But AV is just too basic and unintuitive when it comes to frequent routine actions. Perhaps I'm too used to over-featured Microsoft apps, but AV 2 lacks fundamental tools - like bookmarking, revision tracking, annotation, and version control - that you really need in the business. Even deletion isn't as simple as it should be, and I'm still trying to work out how I delete a scene other than "undo." Saving documents is particularly annoying; there's no way of setting an autosave, which is essential anyway, but especially as AV crashes frequently. (A rare experience for me these days with any app.) Even a compulsive "two minute saver" like me ends up losing material.
Customisation is too limited. I can't even change the width of the header cells to accommodate the category names I need on my scripts. And there's no way of adding comments or tracking revisions without outputting the script to a PDF or a text document so that colleagues and clients can read it and annotate/ revise it. I then have to transfer those revisions manually to the AV document because it can't compare or import changes.
Good points about AV; if you're an absolute novice at word processing, it saves you the hassle of creating a document template in your word processor of choice. You also know it's accepted in the industry, which matters when companies can be so picky about formats. It does the (very rigid) layout thinking for you when you switch between video, character, and dialogue.
Bad points about AV; it needs a whole extra level of tools for saving docs, formatting, annotation, version control, and revision. It's almost as if whoever built it didn't know all the things that scriptwriters have to do, and the stages that a script has to go through in the real world. It could have been replaced by two-column templates within Final Draft 8. (Unless there's a solid technical reason why they couldn't do that - although I can't think of one.)
Conclusion; I don't regret buying Final Draft 8, but I wish I'd spent time testing the demo version of AV 2 before parting with my cash. I didn't, because I needed the app for an urgent job that cropped up on a weekend, so more fool me. If I'd had the time and inclination to build my own two-column templates in Word, I'd have the ability to recover crashed documents, autosave, backup versions, track revisions, and add comments - none of which should be beyond a product that costs as much as Final Draft AV. If you need to use this in the real world to earn money - well, I spent more time grappling with its shortcomings than I did actually writing the script. I'm setting aside some time to build my own templates now.