Shop now Shop now Shop now Shop All Amazon Fashion Up to 70% off Fashion Cloud Drive Photos Shop now Shop Amazon Fire TV Shop now Shop Fire HD 6 Learn More Shop now Shop now Shop now
Buy Used
+ £2.80 UK delivery
Used: Good | Details
Sold by Brit-Books
Condition: Used: Good
Comment: Simply Brit: We have dispatched from our UK warehouse books of good condition to over 1 million satisfied customers worldwide. We are committed to providing you with a reliable and efficient service at all times.
Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

Fatal Decision: Anzio and the Battle for Rome Paperback – 5 Nov 1992

5 customer reviews

See all formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
Paperback, 5 Nov 1992
--This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.

Special Offers and Product Promotions

  • Save £20 on with the aqua Classic card. Get an initial credit line of £250-£1,200 and build your credit rating. Representative 32.9% APR (variable). Subject to term and conditions. Learn more.

Product details

  • Paperback: 576 pages
  • Publisher: Flamingo; New edition edition (5 Nov. 1992)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0006379265
  • ISBN-13: 978-0006379263
  • Product Dimensions: 20 x 13.4 x 4 cm
  • Average Customer Review: 5.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (5 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 68,445 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Product Description


`D'Este is a superb military historian, and here he has found a
subject that gives full-scope to his talents'
-- Michael Howard, Times Literary Supplement

`Fatal Decision establishes Carlo D'Este as one of the foremost
modern historians of the Second World War' -- Max Hastings --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.

About the Author

Carlo D'Este is a retired lieutenant colonel from the US army, having served in Germany, England and Vietnam. His many books include the acclaimed studies of the Sicily and Normandy campaigns and a biography of General Patton. He lives in Massachusetts --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.

Inside This Book

(Learn More)
Browse and search another edition of this book.
Browse Sample Pages
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index | Back Cover
Search inside this book:

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?

Customer Reviews

5.0 out of 5 stars
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
See all 5 customer reviews
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

11 of 11 people found the following review helpful By Donaldo on 27 Jun. 2007
Format: Paperback
Carol D'este is one of the most interesting, reflective and sympathetic military historians writing today. This is a very good assessment of the mistakes made by Allied forces in trying to break through the Gothic line, resulting in the aborted Anzio landings, and the disastrous battles of Monte Cassino.

The author lays most of the blame for failure at the feet of British Field Marshall Alexander and American General Mark Clark, though many others had a hand in it, including Churchill. But it's the first two who take the bulk of the blame. Alexander comes across as the quintessential gentleman, but a bit of an intellectual lightweight, and devoid of any particular strategic ideas. He didn't put his put down when his decisions were questioned, particularly in relation to Mark Clark. Whilst his diplomatic skills were admittedly essential in dealing with a multi-national force, someone more decisive was needed.

The author also spends much time helping to clear the reputation of Lucas, the American general in command of the Anzio landing forces. Again and again, we see that Lucas could not have succeeded - his force was far too small to do much than hold the beach-head, particularly against the tactically flexible German forces. Anzio was too far away from the main allied line to be supported by it.

Mark Clark comes off worse, though. An unlikeable and extremely vain man, his actions at Anzio and Monte Cassino showed him at his worst. The author roundly condemns Clark for his actions towards the end of the offensive - rather than encircle and crush the German 10th Army, he sped off to Rome to arrange photo shoots and press conferences.

One of the more interesting analyses the author does is of British-American tensions within the allied command.
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
4 of 4 people found the following review helpful By N. Brown VINE VOICE on 14 July 2011
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
Having just finished reading James Holland's `Italy's Sorrow' I was left perplexed by the author's praise for Generals Mark Clark and Harold Alexander. Surely this could not be right? Surely this bit of historical revisionism was unjustified? In Holland's view Clark and Alex were good commanders because they won in the end. But on that basis all Allied commanders must be superior to their Axis counter-parts. Holland picks up his part of the story of the Italian Campaign in May 1944, just in time to cover the liberation of Rome, which remains the single most controversial part of the whole campaign due to Mark Clark's decision to switch VI Corps line of attack out of Anzio towards Rome. This work by Carlo D'Este is the prequel to that and covers in detail the planning and execution of the breakout battle that still causes so much controversy.

Carlo D'Este is never one to shy away from putting allied leaders under the spotlight and taking apart their decision making with the sort of forensic analysis of the evidence that suggests he missed his vocation as a trial lawyer. Here Churchill, Alexander and Clark get the full D'Este treatment. All are found wanting: Churchill for interfering in strategic military planning with little regard to the realities of the logistical situation; Alexander for being out of his depth and more concerned with maintaining good intra-allied relationships; and Clark for his vanity and poor planning. In the end one can sense the anger in the author at Clark's decision to put his own vain-glory before military expediency.
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful By Hussar on 21 Feb. 2014
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
This work is by far one if the best written on any battle and does much to explain the courses of action and responses that led to one of the worst stalemates of the whole of WW2.

The explanation of the reasons behind Shingle doesn't shed a great deal of further light on the subject - this has been covered in so many written histories and papers that there isn't much new to say (not a criticism of the book or author), but from then on, this work develops into one of the most rounded studies of pretty much any WW2 battle and is by far the best work on Anzio yet written.

His explanation of how each Army fought does a great deal to dispel so much of the sniping that has been written by (admittedly mainly American) authors on the British Infantry conduct in the Beachhead and their 'excessive' losses.
The terrain, the lack of divisions intially slated for the operation, the ferocity of the German response all contribute to subdue such flat arguments about 1st Division's lack of adequate control over the battleground. The tenacity and professionalism of the British Soldier is mentioned time and again and goes to prove how well regarded they should have been to VI Corps command.

Churchill, Alexander and Lucas, all take their fair share of criticism from D'Este, who reserves the most scalding critique for Clark. One gets the impression that the more D'Este learned about Clark's actions the less sense any of the made in the context of fighting and WINNING a war, as opposed to trying to nurture a media celebrity status. Clark's actions bordered on criminally negligent and even his own troops at the time spotted this. Sadly for some, like the gallant Fred Walker, they made too much of an issue of it, whereupon they were removed by Clark.

This is an outstanding piece of work and is THE book for Anzio.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again