I expected a different type of study on food in the Olmec world, however, the approach here was not totally beyond my needs. In general I found the research extremely limited in comparison to what might have been accomplished had other factors been considered at all, or considered thoroughly - e.g. stela and buildings, to glean information about the place of food in the public display (artifacts)- and of the labor capacity needed to build the various mounds and monuments to determine what food demands - labor and surplus - were placed on the villages. The work did not effectively, if at all, address the type of political makeup of the society besides looking for `elites' and their demands from the outside. That the people united to engage in intensive farming, build villages (including housing), engage in crafts, trade and purchases indicates some lever of social-organization for which some examination and analysis would have been helpful.
The author presented theories, hers and of others, that were ill-suited to understanding the Olmec - e.g. there was the presumption that control of the population meant there must have been `domination of the population' - a structure rooted in conflict. Yet, the presumption was contradicted by the author with evidence to show that the people were, and remained, `egalitarian'.
Having limited the scope of research to the Olmec society as completely indigenous marred almost to a fault the outcome of this study. For example, no qualitative answer as to why the people began `intensive farming' was provided, nor the mechanism for organizing a village, or united villages. The research would have been helped if there was at least a comparison or contrast of the two `hamlets' studied to one or more of the major centers - La Venta, San Lorenzo, or Tres Zapotes - to have some idea as to whether these smaller villages were consistent in their food focus of significantly different, etc.
The book in many ways is a disappointment having missed so many opportunities. Lastly, its clear that the author did not do her homework in some areas - especially in understanding social organization - and instead tried to fudge her way - and was rather poor at that.
The topic is worth a critic study and should be properly completed by the author.