As I start this review I can't make up my mind whether or not I enjoyed reading Far North. Its certainly well written, the narrative is chock full of startling imagery and the whole book is suffused with a potent, haunting atmosphere. Is it an enjoyable read is however, a hard question to answer. I suppose it depends on how you react to a post-apocalyptic tale of one person's quest to survive in a world where society has collapsed into chaos. Personally, whilst the book held my attention it didn't really touch me emotionally. I never fully empathised with the character of Makepeace, and the world in which she lived never came fully alive for me. Partly this is because grim post-apocalyptic tales aren't really my thing but it was also due to the author's decision to keep wider events deliberately opaque. We're never told precisely what disaster has befallen the world or how wide the impact of it has been, we're just given hints. He never even tells us what year the book is set in. This lack of a wider panorama makes it hard to really care greatly about the main plot.
That plot is itself also a problem. To say that it rambles would be an understatement. It meanders so badly that by the book's mid-point you're not sure where its going and even if there is a plot or just a series of vignettes. When a focus to the story is found it relies so heavily on unlikely coincidence that it feels forced.
Add to that the fact that Far North is one depressing tale, with barely a glimmer of hope in the events portrayed and I would say that, on reflection, unless you have a fondness for meandering post-apocalyptic tales featuring death by, variously, freezing, child birth, poisoning, natural disasters, shooting, crucifiction or enslavement, then Far North is probably not for you. Having order my thoughts on the book by putting them in writing I can say with some certainty that it wasn't for me.