This novel revisits the characters from the author's
The Glittering Prizes, published thirty-one years previously, and translates them into the late-70s (the previous book was set in the mid-50s / early-60s). The protagonist in both stories is Adam Morris, a clever, witty Jewish writer who went to St John's College Cambridge, writes screenplays and translates classical literature as well as writing novels, has won a Best Screenplay Oscar and has been married to the same woman for much of his life. If you thought that this sounds remarkably like Frederic Raphael, you'd be right, and you could then maybe be forgiven for wondering whether the other characters in these books were also based on real people, and whether the dialogue had anything to do with what the author had said to them or - perhaps more interestingly - what he wished he'd said (I'm reminded of one of the stories in Raphael's
Oxbridge Blues, which consists almost entirely of two characters spewing elegant invective at each other and has always struck me - perhaps misguidedly - as arising from some personal sense of quarrelsome resentment on the part of the author).
This isn't a trivial point, because there's an awful lot of dialogue here, and the author has decided to use it to drive the story forward, with minimal scene-setting - or even very much indication of who's speaking. Such allusion can lead to confusion on the part of the reader, because the author's overwhelming desire to have his characters say witty and penetratingly brilliant things *all the time* leads to a uniformity that can obscure any distinction between them. They can also end up speaking what looks like nonsense, as Anna (whom Adam tries "to believe [...] had been, as she had, *the* actress of their Cambridge generation" [p288]) does: "I've found God, you know. Of a kind. The kind that isn't there, and isn't kind."
There's another - more minor - sense in which it appears that the author's less interested in who they are than in what he can make them say. Two characters from the previous book were named Barbara Parks and Francesca Pope; here - apparently because there are two other more prominent characters who also have those Christian names - they're called Shirley and Fay. This is in spite of the fact that little confusion was caused by all four of them being together in the previous novel (Adam Morris even points out on p247 of this book that it's quite possible to know people with the same name in real life). In a similar vein, another character (Bill Bourne) now seems to come from Liverpool, rather than the Birmingham his origins were assigned to in the previous book.
I was slightly annoyed to come across these glitches because I greatly enjoyed The Glittering Prizes (even naively thinking of it, at one point, as a kind of handbook on how to speak and behave once you got to university) and wanted to find out how the characters had turned out. This is an entertaining, smart account of what they ended up saying to each other, but seems to have been constructed without any affection for them, or any apparent feeling for what they were supposed to be.