John Gray argues global capitalism is an unworkable, unattainable, unrealizable economic delusion. There are several reasons for this. Among them:
1. A free market is antithetical to democracy. A democracy where everyone has a say will never want a fully fledged free market because the losers will always outnumber the winners.
2. People will never be happy in a free market because the stress in their lifes will be too high as a result from the uncertainties of the free market.
3. The free market neglects human needs for social identity and social security. This means people will have no sense of loyality to state or political edifices. Lassez faire economics can only inevitably self implode.
In his polemic, he considers several economies including USA, New Zealand, Sweden, Germany, China and Japan. It's not a bad book but I think the shortcoming of it is that it is too concerned with nit picking
all the problems with the free market. While there's nothing wrong with a detailed analysis, it just seems one eyed. Nothing is ever perfect, so it should come as no suprise to any rational thinking person that the free market has its faults. The question is what is the best way for us to have innovation, efficiency and a humane welfare state with distribution of wealth? Is that possible or is it always a see-saw act between capitalist and socialist ideologies? I thought this book was too concerned with articulating problems rather than searching for solutions.