Alex Perry's Falling of the Edge was a speculative buy. I assumed from the spiel on the back of the book that it would be a collection of interesting reportage on the Developing World in the context of Globalization. Instead, Perry delivers mediocre reportage at a rattling pace and some crude, banal analysis.
The range of areas covered is fairly large- South Africa, Somalia, Afghanistan, China, India, Nepal. The pieces on the vast new mega-city on Chinas coast near Hong-Kong, South Africa and Bombay are moderately interesting. There is an awareness of the other side of the Indian and Chinese economic miracles. Its not particularly deep but at least it's there.
Other parts, such as the massacre of prisoners near Mazar-i-Sharif (where Perry later admits he "fell in love with war"?) or the account of a U.S. attack on Karbala in 2003 begin to seriously irritate. Outside Mazar-i-Sharif an idiotic-CIA interrogation (in Russian and English!) of several hundred maltreated Taliban prisoners triggers an insurrection in which one of the CIA men is killed. Perry describes the ensuing slaughter of 300 prisoners - "I saw American and British commandos and barefoot Afghani soldiers courageously and skilfully slaughter 300 of their enemies in the single bloodiest battle of the Afghan war." Must be terribly courageous to point a laser targeting device while 500lb and 2000lb bombs rain from the skies? The incident in Karbala is little better, U.S. troops shoot everything that moves. In one case shooting an old man who is attending to a wounded Iraqi fighter, in another shooting two 8 or 9 year old boys for nothing more than picking up a RPG round lying outside their house. Unlike others violence, say Maoists in Nepal or Naxalites in India, all this passes without much comment. The same for a U.S. soldier who comments after the fighting in which dozens of civilians must have been killed along the lines of - they had no business being here? Well, after all it is only their homes and nearby streets they were in. Where exactly should they have been?
Much of the rest of the writing is little better, there is a shallowness to the quality of the reportage, and the analysis at times is weak. In the end chapter- "Is War Good?" Perry eschews weak analysis for a callous wackiness. He appears to celebrate war and violence as some sort of Darwinian struggle and essentially human if not humane activity? - the observant reader will notice echoes of Hitler; draws a parallel between U.S. a hundred years ago and India now that frankly doesn't hold much water; pontificates on how beautiful your average war zone is for reasons that are not entirely clear to this reader at any rate, before ending with a few hollow platitudes from the Dali-Lama.
There are much better books available in terms of reportage and analysis than this shallow, callous, illogical book that is best left on the shelf.