The great decline of amphibians was very much in the news during the early 1990's, but since then, not much is heard in the popular press about this issue. Did the problem go away? Did science ever figure out what the cause was? Or has the cause been found and a solution been put into place? Colony colapse disorder and a great decline in honey bees and other pollinators is now very much in the news, and I was curious if there were any similarities between these two cases, where each represented a whole category of animals that were disappearing globally. Also, it is very difficult to measure populations of both amphibians and bees. In particular, the activity of these animals is very much affected by weather, and their populations fluctuate greatly. For some species, you can only find them after a particular weather event, or during the right time of day, at the right time of the year. I was curious how anyone knew that the amphibians were in decline. Last but not least, I knew that a pathogen had been determined to be the 'cause' for the amphibian declines, yet a considerable research effort continues towards determining how various other factors affect amphibian declines, including global warming and habitat loss. So I was curious, is the disease theory widely accepted by herpatologists, nor not? Or are these factors somehow intertwined, with the causes for the declines being more complex than a global epidemic of some sort? This book answers these questions, and it is nicely written in an easy to follow format using an historical prespective: describing how the problem was discovered, how herpatologists rounded up the political support to get the research funding needed to work on finding a solution, how the causes for the declines were elucidated, and where the frogs and salamanders are at today. If you are interested in conservation biology, you will find this an interesting story. It is The Rest of the Story, what happened after the newspapers quit reporting.