Mills' first two books (The Restraint of Beasts and All Quiet on the Orient Express) are among my all time favorites, however, his last two (Three to See the King and The Scheme for Full Employment) were deeply disappointing. This latest brief novel has many of the Mills' hallmarks, such as sparse deadpan prose, black humor, and an almost entirely male cast, but ultimately falls more into the disappointing category.
The story is built around a kind of pastiche of the 1911 "race" to the South Pole between Norwegian explorer Roald Amundsen and British explorer Robert Scott. Set in what seems to be the same era, the chapters alternate between the efforts of an apparently British team and an apparently Scandinavian team to reach the "AFP" (Agreed Furthest Point from Civilization). The composition of the teams mirrors the real Amundsen/Scott race in that the British is made up of a large group of enthusiastic amateurs and the Scandinavian team is a smaller unit of professionals. Like the real-life expeditions, there is much hardship and battling of the elements, although this expedition is not polar, but faces harsh landscapes, bitter wind, and weeks without sun. Since it's not a polar setting, there aren't the sled-dogs one might expect, but instead, there are mule trains, which are vital to the expeditions.
All of this is fairly straightforward stuff, as are the various interpersonal rivalries and jealousies that erupt between the members of the expeditions. The formal, quasi-military groups are the perfect venue for Mills' spare, deadpan style, which perfectly mirrors the psychological discomfort among the men. However, as one would expect from a Mills novel, disparate episodes slowly congeal into a darker atmosphere. For example, what is this "Theory of Transportation" which is the catalyst for the expeditions? And why are the two teams intent not just on reaching the AFP, but of establishing a trail to be used in the future by others? Anyone whose read any of Mills' books knows that All Is Not As It Seems...
It becomes impossible to discuss the novel's larger themes and ambitions without revealing the book's major twist. However, the twist is not a fresh or surprising one (especially to avid readers of classic science fiction), and anyone who's guessed the twist is likely to be left feeling rather underwhelmed by it all. The Amundsen/Scott framework is carried through to the end, but ultimately, this ends up feeling more like a neat idea than an actual novel. It's not bad, just somewhat slight.