Experience and Nature and over 2 million other books are available for Amazon Kindle . Learn more
Currently unavailable.
We don't know when or if this item will be back in stock.
Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more

Experience and Nature Unknown Binding – 1926

See all 19 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle Edition
"Please retry"
Unknown Binding
"Please retry"

Product details

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, and more.

Inside This Book (Learn More)
Browse and search another edition of this book.
First Sentence
The title of this volume, Experience and Nature, is intended to signify that the philosophy here presented may be termed either empirical naturalism or naturalistic empiricism, or, taking "experience" in its usual signification, naturalistic humanism. Read the first page
Explore More
Browse Sample Pages
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index | Back Cover
Search inside this book:

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?

Customer Reviews

There are no customer reviews yet on Amazon.co.uk.
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star

Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)

Amazon.com: 4 reviews
74 of 78 people found the following review helpful
Experience Recovered! An Embodied, Naturalistic, Empiricism 22 April 2000
By Gabriel - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Perfect Paperback
In this excellent read, John Dewey further exploits his concept of "experience" as foundational to human knowledge. Dewey's concept of "experience" represents a breakthrough in empiricism, as "experience" for Dewey is not merely "sense impressions" as it was for earlier empiricists. Dewey's "experience" is an iterative process and thoroughlly embodied; the qualities of each individual experience become functioning parts of one's experience in a larger sense, serving to transform the qualities one will experience under certain conditions in the future. Fot the sake of illustration, consider a child's first experience of fire: it is beautiful, exciting, and enticing, until the child gets burned: then each subsequent experience of fire contains an element of fear and danger, as the previous experience transforms the experiences to come.
Dewey uses this concept of experience to provide a theory he calls "naturalistic empiricism"; a pragmatic theory of knowledge that provides a basis for his later inquiries into knowledge and human experience. His treatment of the ontogeny of knowledge provides a compelling, thoroughly materialistic, and Darwinian account of the development of thinking in the human animal without lapsing into an isolating solipsism or into a fanciful dualism. The prevalence of Hegelian philosophy in Dewey's earlier philosophic work and his training as a psychologist provide him with an eye for solid methodology, a powerful sense of the role of social structure in human thinking, and a talent for synthesis.
Experience and Nature is therefore a profoundly social text as well, where Dewey explores the role that social experience plays in the development of knowledge and communication as human attributes, or more to the point, as human activities. I have found this book to be a profound antidote to the despair and irony in writers such as Kierkegaard, Heidegger, Sartre, and Rorty; the meaning and scope of existence is redeemed on an extremely individual level through community and relationships. This book is highly recommended for those with an eye for postmodern philosophy and theories of embodiment (Dewey is frequently compared to Maurice Merleau-Ponty), as it shares much with the hermeneutic tradition, while remaining grounded in a very scientific perspective.
23 of 24 people found the following review helpful
Dewey's most thorough and captivating work. 20 Mar. 2007
By A.E.V. - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Perfect Paperback Verified Purchase
After deciding to work my way through every Dewey book I could still find in print, I finally got into this one. Dewey's other works are good, but this one is great.

This book is, minimally, essential reading for anyone who wishes to understand the epistemology underlying Dewey's educational theory. Or, in fact, any of his other theories.

More than that, it is possibly the best single articulation of pragmatic philosophy; where William James applied pragmatic method to specific issues of morals and metaphysics, Dewey has here expounded on many of the broad implications of that method. The central ideas of this book are the inclusion of quality and ends in natural existence, which are shown to have broad implications for topics such as scientific inquiry, theories of value, and aesthetics. This is one of the best works of epistemology I have ever read. Best of all, it is rigorous and wide-ranging without becoming a System.

At most, it may be the most important work of philosophy ever written in the history of the universe. I'm not going to go that far, though.
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful
Excellent Kindle Edition of an Important Work 24 April 2014
By Gary L. Herstein - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Kindle Edition Verified Purchase
Dewey's major attempt at metaphysics is not without its flaws, but no major work of philosophy ever is. This is an important contribution to Western thought -- not on a scale of Whitehead's "Process and Reality," or Murdoch's "Metaphysics as a Guide to Morals," but far above the irritating twaddle that passes for "analytical metaphysics," or the fatuous "rejection" (as though that was possible!) of metaphysics by 1st and 2nd generation continental thinkers.

This book challenges the reader, and demands considerable thought and attention. Even if one ultimately concludes that Dewey's argument is flawed, the attempt at that argument is already a major step beyond the primary assumptions of Cartesian dualism, Kantian facultative psychology, and the mangled attempts to make sense of the world by so many thinkers today who variously accept those assumptions (even if that acceptance is only in the form of the naïve rejection thereof.)

This Kindle edition is a true eBook, with an active ToC, and hypertexted footnotes. This is an important contribution to digital scholarship.
By Steven H Propp - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Hardcover
John Dewey (1859-1952) was an American philosopher (best known as a Pragmatist), psychologist, and educational reformer whose ideas of “progressive education” have been very influential (as well as controversial, in some circles). He wrote many books, including Reconstruction in Philosophy, The Quest for Certainty, A Common Faith, etc.

He wrote in the Preface to the revised 1929 edition of this book, “I believe that the method of empirical naturalism presented in this volume provides the way, and the only way---although of course no two thinkers will travel it in just the same fashion---by which one can freely accept the standpoint and conclusions of modern science: the way by which we can be genuinely naturalistic and yet maintain cherished values, provided they are critically clarified and reinforced. The naturalistic method… destroys many things much cherished; but it destroys them by revealing their inconsistency with the nature of things… But its main purpose is not destructive… it inspires the mind with courage and vitality to create new ideals and values in the face of the perplexities of a new world.” (Pg. ii-iii) Similarly, he began the first chapter with the statement, “The title of this volume… is intended to signify that the philosophy here presented may be termed either empirical naturalism or naturalistic empiricism, or, taking ‘experience’ in its usual signification, naturalistic humanism.” (Pg. 1a)

He states, “Reference to the primacy and ultimacy of the material of ordinary experience protects us, in the first place, from creating artificial problems which deflect the energy and attention of philosophers from the real problems that arise out of actual subject-matter. In the second place, it provides a check or test for the conclusions of philosophic inquiry; it is a constant reminder that we must replace them… in the experience out of which they arose… In the third place, in seeing how they thus function in further experiences, the philosophical results themselves acquire empirical value.” (Pg. 18-19)

He asserts, “Philosophy, thinking at large, allows itself to be diverted into absurd search for an intellectual philosopher’s stone of absolutely wholesale generalizations, thus isolating that which is permanent in a function and for a purpose, and converting it into the intrinsically eternal, conceived either… as that which is the same at all times, or as that which is indifferent to time, out of time.” (Pg. 27)

He suggests, “Nothing but unfamiliarity stands in the way of thinking of both mind and matter as different characters of natural events, in which matter expresses their sequential order, and mind the order of their meanings in their logical connections and dependencies.” (Pg. 74)

He summarizes, “This entire discussion … aims to show that the problems which constitute modern epistemology with its rival, materialistic, spiritualistic, dualistic doctrines, and rival realistic, idealistic, representational theories; and rival doctrines of relation of mind and matter occasionalism, pre-established harmony, parallelism, panpsychism, etc., have single origin in the dogma which denies temporal quality to reality as such.” (Pg. 149)

He says, “it seems wonderful that man should be possessed of a sense of order, beauty and rightness; that he should have a capacity of thinking and knowing, so that man is elevated far above nature and seated with angels. But the wonder and mystery do not seem to be other than the wonder and mystery that there should be such a thing as nature, as existential events, at all, and that in being they should be what they are. The wonder should be transferred to the whole course of things.” (Pg. 276-277)

He points out, “Some purely logical operations are better than others, even as purely logical, for they have greater scope and fertility, but none are truer or more correct than others. Purely formal errors are impossible, so-called formal fallacies to the contrary notwithstanding. No one ever actually reasoned that since horses are quadrupeds and cows are quadrupeds, horses are cows. If in some cases, it is made to appear that formal reasoning falls into such fallacies, the reason is that material causes are brought in and their operation is overlooked.” (Pg. 286-287)

He observes, “The greater part of mind is only implicit in any conscious act or state; the field of mind---of operative meanings---is enormously wider than that of consciousness. Mind is contextual and persistent; consciousness of focal and transient. Mind is, so to speak, structural, substantial; a constant background and foreground; perceptive consciousness is process, a series of heres and nows. Mind is a constant luminosity; consciousness intermittent, a series of flashes of varying intensities. Consciousness is, as it were, the occasional interception of messages continually transmitted…” (Pg. 303)

He admits, “There is indeed much to be said for the view that consciousness is originally a dream-like, efflorescence, and that it gains reference to actual events in nature only under stern compulsion, and by way of accidental coincidence… But the view of complete separation of existential consciousness from connection with physical things cannot be maintained in view of what is known of its specifiable connections with organic conditions, and of the intimate, unbroken connection of organic with extra-organic events.” (Pg. 343)

He concludes, “Positive concrete goods of science, art and social companionship are the basic subject-matter of philosophy as criticism… If philosophy be criticism, what is to be said of the relation of philosophy to metaphysics?... Qualitative individuality and constant relations, contingency and need, movement and arrest are common traits of all existence… Any theory that detects and defines these traits is therefore but a ground-map of the province of criticism…” (Pg. 412-413) He adds, “While, therefore, philosophy has its source not in any special impulse of staked-off section of experience, but in the entire human predicament, this human situation falls wholly within nature.” (Pg. 420-421)

This is one of Dewey’s “key” books, and will be of keen interest to anyone studying his philosophy.
Were these reviews helpful? Let us know

Look for similar items by category