- Hardcover: 406 pages
- Publisher: Palgrave Macmillan; New ed of 2 Revised ed edition (9 Dec 1985)
- Language English
- ISBN-10: 0333395573
- ISBN-13: 978-0333395578
- Average Customer Review: 5.0 out of 5 stars See all reviews (2 customer reviews)
- Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 5,296,908 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- See Complete Table of Contents
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Did you know you can trade in your old books for an Amazon.co.uk Gift Card to spend on the things you want? Plus, get an extra £5 Gift Certificate when you trade in books worth £10 or more before June 30, 2012. Visit the Books Trade-In Store for more details. |
Product details |
More About the Author
Product Description
Review
'A masterly book which is bound to become a standard work.' - Ian Ramsey, View Review
'The most exciting work of its kind that I have read for several years.' - John Raymond, Sunday Times
'A major contribution to the discussion of theodicy.' - Times Literary Supplement
'The most satisfying book I have read on the reconciliation of the enormous fact of evil with our Christian belief in the enormous love and power of God.' - T.E. Jessop, Methodist Recorder
'Deep learning, clear thought, and a profoundly Christian mind...a really important book.' - Church Times
'I do not know of any contemporary work which deals with [the problem of evil] either so thoroughly or so profoundly.' - Hugo Meynell, Catholic Herald
'A very important book, admirable for both its courage and its clarity.' E.L. Mascall, Clergy Review
'The most considerable [book] on the problem of evil to appear in English for a generation.' - W.D. Hudson, Theology
--This text refers to the Paperback edition.
'The most exciting work of its kind that I have read for several years.' - John Raymond, Sunday Times
'A major contribution to the discussion of theodicy.' - Times Literary Supplement
'The most satisfying book I have read on the reconciliation of the enormous fact of evil with our Christian belief in the enormous love and power of God.' - T.E. Jessop, Methodist Recorder
'Deep learning, clear thought, and a profoundly Christian mind...a really important book.' - Church Times
'I do not know of any contemporary work which deals with [the problem of evil] either so thoroughly or so profoundly.' - Hugo Meynell, Catholic Herald
'A very important book, admirable for both its courage and its clarity.' E.L. Mascall, Clergy Review
'The most considerable [book] on the problem of evil to appear in English for a generation.' - W.D. Hudson, Theology
--This text refers to the Paperback edition.
Product Description
When first published, Evil and the God of Love instantly became recognized as a modern theological classic, widely viewed as the most important work on the problem of evil to appear in English for more than a generation. It has continued to be at the centre of discussions ever since. This reissue of the work includes a new preface by the author.
--This text refers to the
Paperback
edition.
Inside This Book
(Learn More)
Browse and search another edition of this book.
Browse and search another edition of this book.
Suggested Tags from Similar Products(What's this?)Be the first one to add a relevant tag (keyword that's strongly related to this product)
|
Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store
If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store.
Learn more
What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?
Customer Reviews
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
22 of 24 people found the following review helpful
Format:Paperback
This book is 400 pages and is a well-written survey of Western theodicies (i.e. defense of God's goodness and omnipotence in view of the existence of evil) since the time of Socrates until the twentieth century. Especially the Augustinian concept of 'privatio boni' (the illusory existence of evil) is thoroughly criticised. Hick is brave enough to propose a theodicy of his own. He draws largely upon Irenaeus (c.120 to 140-c.200 to 203) who proposed a different solution than the Augustinian. Irenaeus suggested that man's condition in Paradise was a childish wholeness rather than a perfect wholeness. Instead, inside man resides the image of God whom humans try to manifest during their lives. So Irenaeus view of man is more positive than the traditional Christian which argues that man, after the fall, is a mere sinful and helpless being, bowing down to a perfectly good and very remote God. In Irenaeus view, there remains the possibility of man restituting paradisal wholeness again by striving to manifest that inner image of God. In this view, man is closer to God and, surprisingly, it tallies finely with our modern psychological and anthropological worldview. I think it's good to hear that, within Christian theology, there exists alternatives to the boring harping on man's miserable condition. Man's condition after the fall is still meaningful since we can strive to attain paradisal wholeness again, although not a childish and naive wholeness like before.
6 of 9 people found the following review helpful
Format:Paperback
Compulsory reading for anyone interested in the questions of suffering and theodicy. A staple in the repertoire by one of Britain's great living philosopher-theologians.
Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)
Amazon.com:
5 reviews
30 of 34 people found the following review helpful
Capricious Omnipotent Overlord or Challenging Parent?
13 Mar 2001
Format:Paperback
It's been 20 years since I first read Hick's book. Looking back, that experience proved to be a definitive turning point in my life.
John Hick presents two philosophies which Christians have used to explain the existence of evil in a universe created by a "good" God. The first philosophy states that God's plan is ineffable--we ought to have faith & not question. What we see as evil, with our limited, mortal vision, is just one feature of God's marvelous plan for the cosmos.
The second philosophy seeks to find reason in the occurrence of evil. Hick echos Ortega y Gasset's philosophy that growth does not happen in comfort, but rather when challenged. Hick adopts this second philosophy, tracing it back to Origen.
Since growth, or soul building, is the purpose of life, Hick argues that God must ensure that everybody achieves the growth necessary for "paradise." This leads to espousing reincarnation, where the soul continues to evolve, until maturity.
19 of 21 people found the following review helpful
An intelligently argued work but for me not the answer
1 Jan 2007
Format:Paperback
Probably the major question the great monotheistic religions must deal with is the question of how an omnipotent omnibenevolent God has created a world in which there is Evil. Another way of saying this, is given by the Psalmist ' A righteous man and bad for him, an evil man and good for him.' Or in G.H. Hopkins version , "Why do sinners ways prosper, and all I endeavor disappointment end?'
Hicks tries to provide an answer through a reading of the work of the Christian theologian Ireneaus .Essentially Hicks maintains that God aims to provide goodness and perfection for His creatures. And that Evil is that which impairs this process of perfection. The ultimate answer to this as Hicks sees it can only be given in the world- to - come.
To my mind this answer does not even begin to answer the first question of Theodicy i.e. why is there even one suffering child in the world, one person in pain who knows tremendous suffering though they are not responsible for it.
Hicks restates his central argument as follows:
"I have been arguing... that the actual universe, with all its good and evil, exists on the basis of God's will and receives its meaning from His purpose. However, these two conclusions do not stand in simple contradiction , to one another. The one says that evil is bad, harmful, destructive, fearful and to be fought against as a matter of ultimate life and death. But the other does not deny this. It does not say that evil is not fearful and threatening, inimical to all good and to be absolutely resisted. It says that God has ordained a world which contains evil- real evil- as a means to the creation of the infinite good of a Kingdom of Heaven within which His creatures will have come as perfected persons to love and serve Him through a process in which their own free insight and response have been an essential element.
The bridge between the two standpoints is provided by the Christian hope of the Kingdom of God. The compatibility between the 'existensial' view of evil as utterly malevolent and harmful and the theological view of it as divinely permitted and over- ruled ,is a form of the compatibility between the temporary process which we know by our own present immersion within it, and the future completion and transformation of it which we affirm by faith."
This is an interesting answer but it does not answer for me the question of the suffering of the innocents, the pain they go through. It too does not address the fact that there are evils so horrible that they would seem to be all out of proportion to any possible compensation or overcoming.
Nonetheless this work is a carefully argued exposition of a problem of great importance to very many religious believers.
A work which addresses the subject from the perspective of the Jewish Tradition is David Birnbaum's 'Evil and God'
Hicks tries to provide an answer through a reading of the work of the Christian theologian Ireneaus .Essentially Hicks maintains that God aims to provide goodness and perfection for His creatures. And that Evil is that which impairs this process of perfection. The ultimate answer to this as Hicks sees it can only be given in the world- to - come.
To my mind this answer does not even begin to answer the first question of Theodicy i.e. why is there even one suffering child in the world, one person in pain who knows tremendous suffering though they are not responsible for it.
Hicks restates his central argument as follows:
"I have been arguing... that the actual universe, with all its good and evil, exists on the basis of God's will and receives its meaning from His purpose. However, these two conclusions do not stand in simple contradiction , to one another. The one says that evil is bad, harmful, destructive, fearful and to be fought against as a matter of ultimate life and death. But the other does not deny this. It does not say that evil is not fearful and threatening, inimical to all good and to be absolutely resisted. It says that God has ordained a world which contains evil- real evil- as a means to the creation of the infinite good of a Kingdom of Heaven within which His creatures will have come as perfected persons to love and serve Him through a process in which their own free insight and response have been an essential element.
The bridge between the two standpoints is provided by the Christian hope of the Kingdom of God. The compatibility between the 'existensial' view of evil as utterly malevolent and harmful and the theological view of it as divinely permitted and over- ruled ,is a form of the compatibility between the temporary process which we know by our own present immersion within it, and the future completion and transformation of it which we affirm by faith."
This is an interesting answer but it does not answer for me the question of the suffering of the innocents, the pain they go through. It too does not address the fact that there are evils so horrible that they would seem to be all out of proportion to any possible compensation or overcoming.
Nonetheless this work is a carefully argued exposition of a problem of great importance to very many religious believers.
A work which addresses the subject from the perspective of the Jewish Tradition is David Birnbaum's 'Evil and God'
5 of 5 people found the following review helpful
Required reading
11 Sep 2010
Format:Paperback|Amazon Verified Purchase
The reissue in 2010 of a work from 1966 could be just an attempt to keep an old work in print, but this book will be required reading for anyone working
on the problem of evil as long as there are sentient beings on Earth. Hick is lucid, skeptical and creative. He covers all the theological bases and even proposes his own synthetic scheme. However, the greatest value of this book is that it defines the field of discourse for the 21st century.
on the problem of evil as long as there are sentient beings on Earth. Hick is lucid, skeptical and creative. He covers all the theological bases and even proposes his own synthetic scheme. However, the greatest value of this book is that it defines the field of discourse for the 21st century.
Were these reviews helpful?
Let us know
Customer Discussions
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|
Listmania!
Look for similar items by category
Look for similar items by subject
Feedback
- Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
- I am the Author, and I want to comment on my book.
- I am the Publisher, and I want to comment on this book.
