Very interesting read. Lloyd Pye is a very articulate and persuasive speaker (see his presentations on You Tube, Google, etc)., and he delivers this book in similar vein.
The thrust of his argument is that there is no Missing Link - the human race is unique and there is no evidence of any gradual transition between the Neanderthals, Cro-Magnons and others, through to ourselves. Darwin, he theorises, was only partly correct in his theories concerning evolutionary changes, for example, giraffes growing long necks, birds developing different beaks, etc., but modern man possesses a certain amount of DNA simply not seen in the various races of hominoids that inhabited the Earth in prehistoric times.
A good deal of space is given over to the intriguing topic of Bigfoot, Sasquatch, etc., which Pye contends are the true descendants of the ancient hominoids.
Modern man appeared "all of a sudden", as did the various domesticated and farm animals, food crops such as wheat, barley etc.
Pye's theory is that an extraterrestrial race colonised this planet in remote antiquity and created "us" by genetic manipulation using partly their own genes and partly those of the indigenous man-like creatures found on Earth at the time. "We" were created basically to act as slaves for the master race who arrived here. The various farm animals and crops were likewise "imported".
His evidence? The writings of the Sumerians, who, again, seemed to have arrived here out of nowhere about 6,000 years ago. Pye draws heavily on the writings of Zecharia Sitchin and subscribes to the idea that the Earth was struck by a rogue planet, known by the Sumerians as Nibiru, which apparently circles our Sun in an eccentric orbit and passes close by the Earth about once every 3,600 years. Nibiru was inhabited by a race known as the Annunaki, who were the Earth colonisers as described above.
All fascinating stuff, but for me, the big question is, were these Sumerian writings meant to be reality or myth? We'll never know, of course. Scientists seem to agree that there certainly were planetary collisions in the early Solar System, resulting in the Earth missing a large chunk of its crust, as evidenced by the huge expanse of the Pacific Ocean, for example. Another obvious query springs to mind, namely how could the inhabitants of Nibiru survive if their planet's orbit goes way out beyond the orbit of Pluto? Surely it would need the warmth of the Sun?
Pye draws some interesting comparisons between Biblical terminology and the Sumerian writings, e.g. the Sumerian homeland was known as Edin (hence Garden Of Eden) and the genetically manipulated humanoids the Adamu (Adam).
The arguments will go on, and the archaeologists and scientists will no doubt make new "finds" giving more credence to one theory or the other.
As Graham Hancock has often said, we are "marooned in the present" and simply don't have much of an idea about our origins.
It's certainly true that the writers of the Bible, the Epic of Gilgamesh, etc., wouldn't have had the first idea concerning DNA and genetic manipulation, so we are better placed nowadays, to draw more modern, realistic conclusions as to what these ancient writings were referring to in their various versions of the origins of mankind.
Does this book give a realistic explanation as to "How It All Began"? I have my reservations but it's entertaining and stimulating nonetheless.