Eurekas and Euphorias
and over one million other books are available for Amazon Kindle .
Learn more
| ||||||||||||||||||||
 Trade In this Item for up to £0.25
Trade in Eurekas and Euphorias: The Oxford Book of Scientific Anecdotes for an Amazon.co.uk gift card of up to £0.25, which you can then spend on millions of items across the site. Plus, get an extra £5 when you trade in books worth £10 or more until June 30, 2012. Trade-in values may vary (terms apply). Find more products eligible for trade-in.
|
Frequently Bought Together
Product details
|
More About the Author
Product Description
Product Description
The march of science has never proceeded smoothly. It has been marked through the years by episodes of drama and comedy, of failure as well as triumph, by outrageous strokes of luck, deserved and undeserved, and sometimes by human tragedy. It has seen deep intellectual friendships, as well as ferocious animosities, and once in a while acts of theft and malice, deceit, and even a hoax or two. Scientists come in all shapes: the obsessive and the dilettantish, the genial, the envious, the preternaturally brilliant and the slow-witted who sometimes see further in the end, the open-minded and the intolerant, recluses and arrivistes. From the death of Archimedes at the hands of an irritated Roman soldier to the concoction of a superconducting witches' brew at the very close of the twentieth century, the stories in Eurekas and Euphorias pour out, told with wit and relish by Walter Gratzer. Open this book at random and you may chance on the clumsy chemist who breaks a thermometer in a reaction vat and finds mercury to be the catalyst that starts the modern dyestuff industry; or a famous physicist dissolving his gold Nobel Prize medal in acid to prevent it from falling into the hands of the Nazis, recovering it when the war ends; mathematicians and physicists diverting themselves in prison cells, and even in a madhouse, by creating startling advances in their subject. We witness the careers, sometimes tragic, sometimes carefree, of the great women mathematicians, from Hypatia of Alexandria to Sophie Germain in France and Sonia Kovalevskaya in Russia and Sweden, and then Marie Curie's relentless battle with the French Academy. Here, then, a glorious parade unfolds to delight the reader, with stories to astonish, to instruct, and most especially, to entertain.
About the Author
Walter Gratzer is a biophysicist at the Randall Institute, King's College London. He is known to a wide readership through his book reviews which appear regularly in Nature. His books include The Undergrowth of Science: Delusion, Self-Deception and Human Frailty, Longman Literary Companion to Science, and The Bedside Nature.
Inside This Book
(Learn More)
Suggested Tags from Similar Products(What's this?)Be the first one to add a relevant tag (keyword that's strongly related to this product)
|
What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?
Customer Reviews
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
10 of 10 people found the following review helpful
Format:Hardcover
Ever wondered how the great luminaires of Science managed to discover the mysteries of Science ? Not always by careful planning, execution and measurement... This book is a great read, especially for Physicists, a great number of belly laughs and miracle conincidences all held in this elegant hardback. It has been one of the most enjoyable books I have so far this year.
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
Format:Paperback
If you're a science geek and have a knack for funny stories, this is THE book! It's also ideal as a gift
Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)
Amazon.com:
7 reviews
6 of 6 people found the following review helpful
[] Tales for Scientists
9 Mar 2003
Format:Hardcover
If you love science, you love humor, and you are a student of human behavior, this is a book for you. I enjoyed virtually every one of these nine score vignettes.
But these are not just stories. Most are [] tales, in which good tends to triumph over [bad]. Some are about brilliant female scientists who overcome male chauvinism, and other about the numerous afflictions beset upon Jewish scientists in the Nazi era. Several illustrate the intrinsic carnality of science--scientists who experiment on themselves and who revel in human bodily fluids.
The stories are also often quite instructive, in case you are not totally up to snuff in chemistry or physics, and could use a non-technical refresher.
6 of 6 people found the following review helpful
181 interesting scientific anecdotes
10 Jan 2003
Format:Hardcover|Amazon Verified Purchase
Each of the 181 anecdotes here relates the tale(s) of a scientist or a discovery, many affectionately humorous, in short passages varying from one paragraph to several pages. There is no apparent order to the anecdotes, nor is there any editorial narrative to bind them together, so this becomes a book for serendipitous browsing. Each passage is attributed, and the book is supplemented by a name and subject index, though these are not exhaustive.
This is an interesting and fun set of disjointed stories, with editorial energies devoted to their selection rather than cognitive cohesion.
9 of 11 people found the following review helpful
Not even an encyclopedia
1 Dec 2004
Format:Hardcover
I was going to call this book an encyclopedia of pedantic lectures, but it doesn't qualify: encyclopedias are organized.
For the 181 anecdotes in the book, there is no organization at all, that I can tell. If you prefer the stories about physicists, or from the 1900s, or about Newton, you're out of luck. The brief indexes are inadequate, and the shuffled nature of the stories makes searching for the type that you are looking for impossible.
Maybe I was under the wrong impression, but I thought that anecdotes were supposed to be funny and revealing stories. Tragically, Mr. Gratzer instead uses the Oxford English Dictionary definition as: "Secret, private, or hitherto unpublished narratives or details of history." His anecdotes, instead of being funny, well-timed, and enjoyable, end up as thorough, thick, and plodding details of scientific history.
Some sections of the book are actually funny, but they tend to be the blockquotes that the author has lifted from other sources. Mr. Gratzer even stoops so low as to include, verbatim, the common [...] Neils Bohr barometer spam that a brief trip to the urban legends site snopes.com can debunk. I was hoping for little-known, insightful and inside stories, and was disappointed to find things like this annoying forwarded spam included in the book.
Finally, the author's understanding of the underlying science that he is writing about is shoddy. The author tries to relate an understanding of some complex topics in physics, chemistry, and biology, but I don't trust any of it because he doesn't understand Archimedes' principle. From page 44: "Archimedes's Principle, as it is still called, states, of course, that the upthrust of an immersed object is equal to the weight of water displaced." Despite the use of the phrase 'of course', this definition is wrong. Gratzer digs his hole deeper: "So when the crown was lowered into a vessel full of water the amount of water displaced, or the apparent weight of the immersed crown, would give a measure of the volume of the metal; this, with the weight of the crown in air, would deliver the density of the metal and thus its composition." This is the most opaque, convoluted, and confusing wrong explanation I have ever heard. The whole point of Archimedes' Principle is that although measuring the weight of the crown is easy, directly measuring its volume is difficult. Since both are needed to determine the object's density, from which you can infer composition, the genius in Archimedes' idea is that you can *indirectly* measure the crown's precise volume by lowering it into water, and then measuring the volume of water that it displaces instead of trying to measure the dimensions of the crown itself. What this has to do with Gratzer's "amount of water displaced, or the apparent weight of the immersed crown" I have no idea.
Although the idea behind this book is great, I was greatly disappointed by its execution. Perhaps had the author tried to tell a few stories well, rather than every story he could find and in as concise a manner as possible, I would have been able to read past story #88 without growing so bored as to be unwilling to finish the rest.
For the 181 anecdotes in the book, there is no organization at all, that I can tell. If you prefer the stories about physicists, or from the 1900s, or about Newton, you're out of luck. The brief indexes are inadequate, and the shuffled nature of the stories makes searching for the type that you are looking for impossible.
Maybe I was under the wrong impression, but I thought that anecdotes were supposed to be funny and revealing stories. Tragically, Mr. Gratzer instead uses the Oxford English Dictionary definition as: "Secret, private, or hitherto unpublished narratives or details of history." His anecdotes, instead of being funny, well-timed, and enjoyable, end up as thorough, thick, and plodding details of scientific history.
Some sections of the book are actually funny, but they tend to be the blockquotes that the author has lifted from other sources. Mr. Gratzer even stoops so low as to include, verbatim, the common [...] Neils Bohr barometer spam that a brief trip to the urban legends site snopes.com can debunk. I was hoping for little-known, insightful and inside stories, and was disappointed to find things like this annoying forwarded spam included in the book.
Finally, the author's understanding of the underlying science that he is writing about is shoddy. The author tries to relate an understanding of some complex topics in physics, chemistry, and biology, but I don't trust any of it because he doesn't understand Archimedes' principle. From page 44: "Archimedes's Principle, as it is still called, states, of course, that the upthrust of an immersed object is equal to the weight of water displaced." Despite the use of the phrase 'of course', this definition is wrong. Gratzer digs his hole deeper: "So when the crown was lowered into a vessel full of water the amount of water displaced, or the apparent weight of the immersed crown, would give a measure of the volume of the metal; this, with the weight of the crown in air, would deliver the density of the metal and thus its composition." This is the most opaque, convoluted, and confusing wrong explanation I have ever heard. The whole point of Archimedes' Principle is that although measuring the weight of the crown is easy, directly measuring its volume is difficult. Since both are needed to determine the object's density, from which you can infer composition, the genius in Archimedes' idea is that you can *indirectly* measure the crown's precise volume by lowering it into water, and then measuring the volume of water that it displaces instead of trying to measure the dimensions of the crown itself. What this has to do with Gratzer's "amount of water displaced, or the apparent weight of the immersed crown" I have no idea.
Although the idea behind this book is great, I was greatly disappointed by its execution. Perhaps had the author tried to tell a few stories well, rather than every story he could find and in as concise a manner as possible, I would have been able to read past story #88 without growing so bored as to be unwilling to finish the rest.
Were these reviews helpful?
Let us know
Customer Discussions
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|
Listmania!
Look for similar items by category
Look for similar items by subject
Feedback
- Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
- I am the Author, and I want to comment on my book.
- I am the Publisher, and I want to comment on this book.
|
