Buy Used
FREE Delivery on orders over £10.
Used: Good | Details
Sold by Tree Savers
Condition: Used: Good
Comment: A used book that is in good, clean condition. Your item will be picked, packed and posted FREE to you within the UK by Amazon, also eligible for super saver delivery
Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

The Equivoque Principle (Cornelius Quaint Chronicles, Book 1) Paperback – 28 May 2009

See all 10 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle Edition
"Please retry"
"Please retry"
£0.96 £0.01

Trade In Promotion

Product details

  • Paperback: 352 pages
  • Publisher: The Friday Project; Reprint edition (28 May 2009)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 190554894X
  • ISBN-13: 978-1905548941
  • Product Dimensions: 13 x 2.5 x 19.7 cm
  • Average Customer Review: 3.4 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (29 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 224,270 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

As a boy I visited a circus where a kindly old fortune-teller decreed that I would grow up to become an author & illustrator of quirky, comedy, adventure stories.
If I ever grow up, I'll be sure to let her know that she was right.

Below are the various ways of getting in contact with me:

* Follow me on Twitter: @DarrenCraske.
* Check out my blog at:
* Like my Facebook page at:
* Mail me at:
* Direct Message me on

* Or if all that fails, you could always record a holographic message and store it inside an Astromech Droid that hijacks an escape pod to flee from a Rebel Cruiser under attack by an Imperial Star Destroyer, and thus successfully completing a million to one landing on the nearby planet just a short walk from my small house in the Jundland Wastes.

Product Description


• 'Boisterous comedy and hairpin plot twists' - The Times

Book Description

A fantastic Victorian adventure inspired by the penny dreadfuls and newspaper serials of the times.

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?

Customer Reviews

3.4 out of 5 stars

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

32 of 35 people found the following review helpful By Amazon Customer on 18 Sep 2010
Format: Paperback
This is one of the worst books I have ever read. It is very badly written. In addition to the errors pointed out by the other one star reviewers, the author seems to think 'sporadically' means 'coincidentally', apparently imagines that there was no real rule of law in Victorian England, what with the police having the right to hang people, and police stations being staffed by a Police Commissioner with a sergeant as his second in command, and has a very strange view of the sphere of influence and likely activities of bishops in the Church of England at the time. The plot is full of coincidences and 'with one bound he was free' style escapes. In short, I only finished it because I was wide-eyed with wonder at its sheer awfulness. The author thanks himself in his acknowledgements. It's hard to see why.
4 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
5 of 5 people found the following review helpful By Mister Spong on 23 Dec 2011
Format: Paperback
Must admit that I picked this book up from somewhere else having not read the reviews and had I done I might not have bought it! That said, it really isn't as bad as some of the reviews would have you believe.

Let's get the gripes out of the way.

I don't particularly like Darren Craske on what I've seen of him from this book. To thank yourself in the acknowledgements is bordering on the arrogant and to sign off the acknowledgements with "you haven't seen the last of me" suggest an over inflated self importance. Tip for you Darren, learn a bit of humility.

Secondly it's a bit cliched. No surprise there, we're on the verge of 2012 and the chances of someone writing something wholly original are next to nil.

Three, the comment about it being "comedy" on the cover from The Times review is a somewhat baffling. I didn't laugh at it once and nor did I see something that was particularly chucklesome that just wasn't funny to me.

Finally, there was a bit of sloppy editing as at least one section of the book appeared to be repeated. Not DC's fault that I can see.

That aside...

Now I've no idea of Victorian London. I wasn't there and I haven't studied it, so the accuracy of the geography that other people have commented on may or may not be correct. But that doesn't interest me. I buy books to entertain me, to interest me and as a form of relaxation. Did I get all of that from this book? Well yes I probably did. The characters are fairly well painted, the story flowed reasonably well and in general we got from beginning to end without me actually wondering "what the hell happened there?" or with me wanting to put the book back on the shelf and reach for something else.

So it's not without flaws. But it's not a bad book.
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
26 of 29 people found the following review helpful By Edwin Flay on 30 July 2009
Format: Paperback
I would quite comfortably say that this is the worst book I have read in about five years.

The writing is laboured and heavy-handed; the characters are two-dimensional, and the dialogue is almost physically painful to read. The author has chosen to make his lead character a magician, and yet has clearly done no research whatsoever into the history of magic (for instance: the story is set quite clearly in 1853, and a reference is made to a magic trick first performed in the 1920s). The sub-editing is dismal (at one point there is a reference to saltwater, which switches some ten pages later to rainwater), and at one point a paragraph is repeated verbatim on two consecutive pages, interrupting a sentence half-way at one point (though this may be a printer's error).

Add to this unappetising mix a couple of plot points lifted directly from Boris Akunin (to whom the publishers had the audacity to compare this doggerel favourably), woeful anachronisms, contradictory character motivation, an apparent inability to read a map of London, a singularly unlikeable hero, a macguffin that makes absolutely no sense, and you have a thoroughly disappointing reading experience. Save yourselves! Read virtually anything else instead!
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful By Michael Watson TOP 1000 REVIEWERVINE VOICE on 15 Dec 2010
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
I've had this book on my 'to read' shelf for quite some time, awaiting the moment when I needed a break from the modern rash of serial killers. A good old Victorian serial killer seemed the antidote.

Well, the book is filled with quaint (pardon the pun) characters, none of whom is likely to instill in the reader a desire to know more about them. The story rollicks along, it's easy to read except for the author's lack of concentration on the dialogue. He tries to convey a Victorian world but litters the conversations with words and phrases that just did not exist at that period. This is annoying as it breaks the flow but not too serious for me not have finished the book just to complete the adventure.

And yes, there are some other editing/proof-reading errors; just grit your teeth and carry on reading.

I'm not sure that Victorian England was quite as the author would have us believe. But, in the interests of an adventure story with a larger than life main protagonist, who am I to quibble? Adventure stories are meant to take risks, the trick is to keep the reader entertained - as, indeed, did the penny dreadfuls of that era. The difference today is that the readers have moved on and expect more in the way of accuracy and justification for spending their money.

Cornelius Quaint is certainly a large character; I'm not sure he's worth another story but we'll see. If someone gives me another book, I'll no doubt read it but I doubt I'll hunt him down in the bookstore just yet.
7 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

Most Recent Customer Reviews