The rest of it was okay, nothing spectacular; but the writer's interpretation of Ephesians 4:11-16 infuriates me, this part alone reduced its rating to 1. Junia became "Junias" (masculine), a definitely offensive alteration of the original. No biblical evidence supported his claim that apostles and prophets should cease to exist after the 1st generation of Christianity, in fact, there is a lot in the New Testament itself, especially 1 Corinthians 12-14 and Book of Revelation stating the contrary... He wasn't even bothered to provide sufficient explanations and evidence to back up his claims, expecting his readers to take those views for granted. I regret wasting money on such an off-balance commentary.