English Society: 1580-1680
and over one million other books are available for Amazon Kindle .
Learn more
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
 Trade In this Item for up to £4.50
Trade in English Society 1580-1680 for an Amazon.co.uk gift card of up to £4.50, which you can then spend on millions of items across the site. Plus, get an extra £5 when you trade in books worth £10 or more until June 30, 2012. Trade-in values may vary (terms apply). Find more products eligible for trade-in.
|
Frequently Bought Together
Product details
|
More About the Author
Product Description
Review
'It should be compulsory reading for every student of the period.' – Literary Review
'His book is a triumphant success and deserves to be widely read.' – British Book News
Product Description
English Society, 1580-1680 paints a fascinating picture of society and rural change in the late sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries. Keith Wrightson discusses both the enduring characteristics of society as well as the course of social change, and emphasizes the wide variation in experience between different social groups and local communities. This is an excellent interpretation of English society, its continuity and its change.
Inside This Book
(Learn More)
Browse and search another edition of this book.
Browse and search another edition of this book.
Suggested Tags from Similar Products(What's this?)Be the first one to add a relevant tag (keyword that's strongly related to this product)
|
What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?
Customer Reviews
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
15 of 21 people found the following review helpful
Format:Paperback
As a student of English economic and social history, I found this book very useful as it provides information necessary for a wide variety of essay topics, reinforcing opinions with data and contemporary descriptions.
Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)
Amazon.com:
1 review
5 of 5 people found the following review helpful
Middle of the road
14 Jun 2010
Format:Paperback
I have never read a book before that has so many statements followed by: "X should not be exaggerated." Keith Wrightson's "English Society 1580-1680" is almost comical in its middle-of-the-roadness. If any English century should lend itself to exaggerations, it ought to be the one that encompassed Francis Drake, Willliam Shakespeare, a civil war, execution of a king, a military dictatorship and Isaac Newton.
Few of those make it into Wrightson's book, which is so devotedly a social history that the civil war is hardly mentioned.
Instead, he wonders what homely things were like: how Englishmen and women met mates, talked their parents into agreeing to a marriage, learned to read, conducted themselves on Sundays.
To an American, even one not descended from any of these English people, the answers are relevant, because the attitudes of 17th century England were the ones planted in North America, with their medieval survivals and modernizing innovations. In a book written long after this one, "Albion's Seed," David Hackett Fisher demonstrated how the attitudes of the early English (and in some cases, Dutch, German or even Swedish) settlers tended to magnify and reverberate for many generations. But mostly the English.
Wrightson presents a society rather freer and more flexible than its image. The law may have given fathers a veto over their children's marriage partners, but (except for the aristocracy), most fathers were indulgent. It was the beginning of love matches, but, as Wrightson also notes, it was a time and place where about one woman in 10 never married. This was, he notes, much different from European societies farther east, where virtually all women married.
Again, the riots against enclosures or food shortages were, in his description, less riots than theatrically staged protests, and they lacked the violent atrocities that marked French food protests of the same age.
He may oversell how indulgent, flexible and tolerant English society was. To the extent that English people were indulgent or tolerant, they limited their niceness to fellow Englishmen.
The other principal theme that comes through is that the century of 1580-1680 saw the creation of a permanent English underclass, such as had not existed before. In the middle ages and early Renaissance, England was rural and the people in it were to a considerable degree economically autonomous, if poor.
The commercialization of agriculture raised overall levels of consumption, but it cut away the self-sufficiency of the poorest, who were driven off the land, which had provided a regular, if small, income. Once they became wage laborers, their income periodically dropped to nothing, which happened to a medieval peasant only in times of total crop failure.
Life in England, says Wrightson, became less secure for the many, and, as we know from, say, the Left Book Club volumes of George Orwell, it remained that way for many centuries.
Few of those make it into Wrightson's book, which is so devotedly a social history that the civil war is hardly mentioned.
Instead, he wonders what homely things were like: how Englishmen and women met mates, talked their parents into agreeing to a marriage, learned to read, conducted themselves on Sundays.
To an American, even one not descended from any of these English people, the answers are relevant, because the attitudes of 17th century England were the ones planted in North America, with their medieval survivals and modernizing innovations. In a book written long after this one, "Albion's Seed," David Hackett Fisher demonstrated how the attitudes of the early English (and in some cases, Dutch, German or even Swedish) settlers tended to magnify and reverberate for many generations. But mostly the English.
Wrightson presents a society rather freer and more flexible than its image. The law may have given fathers a veto over their children's marriage partners, but (except for the aristocracy), most fathers were indulgent. It was the beginning of love matches, but, as Wrightson also notes, it was a time and place where about one woman in 10 never married. This was, he notes, much different from European societies farther east, where virtually all women married.
Again, the riots against enclosures or food shortages were, in his description, less riots than theatrically staged protests, and they lacked the violent atrocities that marked French food protests of the same age.
He may oversell how indulgent, flexible and tolerant English society was. To the extent that English people were indulgent or tolerant, they limited their niceness to fellow Englishmen.
The other principal theme that comes through is that the century of 1580-1680 saw the creation of a permanent English underclass, such as had not existed before. In the middle ages and early Renaissance, England was rural and the people in it were to a considerable degree economically autonomous, if poor.
The commercialization of agriculture raised overall levels of consumption, but it cut away the self-sufficiency of the poorest, who were driven off the land, which had provided a regular, if small, income. Once they became wage laborers, their income periodically dropped to nothing, which happened to a medieval peasant only in times of total crop failure.
Life in England, says Wrightson, became less secure for the many, and, as we know from, say, the Left Book Club volumes of George Orwell, it remained that way for many centuries.
Was this review helpful?
Let us know
Customer Discussions
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|
Listmania!
Look for similar items by category
Look for similar items by subject
Feedback
- Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
- I am the Author, and I want to comment on my book.
- I am the Publisher, and I want to comment on this book.
|
