Empires of the Sand and over one million other books are available for Amazon Kindle . Learn more


or
Sign in to turn on 1-Click ordering.
or
Amazon Prime free trial required. Sign up when you check out. Learn more
More Buying Choices
Have one to sell? Sell yours here
or
Get a £7.10 Amazon.co.uk Gift Card
Empires of the Sand: The Struggle for Mastery in the Middle East, 1789-1923
 
 
Start reading Empires of the Sand on your Kindle in under a minute.

Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.

Empires of the Sand: The Struggle for Mastery in the Middle East, 1789-1923 [Paperback]

Efraim Karsh
3.7 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (3 customer reviews)
RRP: £18.95
Price: £18.00 & this item Delivered FREE in the UK with Super Saver Delivery. See details and conditions
You Save: £0.95 (5%)
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
In stock.
Dispatched from and sold by Amazon.co.uk. Gift-wrap available.
Only 2 left in stock--order soon (more on the way).
Want guaranteed delivery by Thursday, June 7? Choose Express delivery at checkout. See Details

Formats

Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle Edition £14.06  
Hardcover --  
Paperback £18.00  
Trade In this Item for up to £7.10
Get an extra £5 when you trade in books worth £10 or more until June 30, 2012. Trade in Empires of the Sand: The Struggle for Mastery in the Middle East, 1789-1923 for an Amazon.co.uk gift card of up to £7.10, which you can then spend on millions of items across the site. Trade-in values may vary (terms apply). Find more products eligible for trade-in.


Product details

  • Paperback: 424 pages
  • Publisher: Harvard University Press; New Ed edition (2 April 2001)
  • Language English
  • ISBN-10: 0674005414
  • ISBN-13: 978-0674005419
  • Product Dimensions: 23.4 x 15.6 x 2.8 cm
  • Average Customer Review: 3.7 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (3 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 747,462 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
  • See Complete Table of Contents

More About the Author

Efraim Karsh
Discover books, learn about writers, and more.

Visit Amazon's Efraim Karsh Page

Product Description

Review

A readable, scholarly re-examination of a long and complicated Middle Eastern history...The Karshes provide useful historical backgrounds to the emergence of independent countries in Egypt, Greece, the Balkans and former Danube principalities like Serbia and Romania. But the main purpose of this very detailed and broad-shouldered history is to revise many of the standard interpretations that have been given to Middle Eastern history over the last two centuries. Most generally the Karshes dispute the idea that the main events and developments in the region stem from the machinations of the great powers, especially Britain and France. The 'main impetus behind regional developments,' they write, was 'the local actors'...The authors write clearly and authoritatively and with great geographical sweep. They provide crisp and informed accounts of the main events involving the Ottomans and the rest of the world...Those who do not know much of these events will learn a great deal from this book, while specialists with views differing from the Karshes' will face a robust challenge to their interpretations. -- Richard Bernstein New York Times A provocative new history of the Middle East that in important respects is different from any one had read before...The Ottomans were around for a thousand years, the European portion of their empire for about half of that time. That the ramifications are still with us--so soon afterwards in the long view--should not surprise. The Karshes' important book throws new, in places probing, light on many of those ramifications. -- Colin Walters Washington Times Contrary to the supposition, popular with historians from the East and the West, that the Ottoman Empire was slowly bled to death by the great powers of Europe who later fed upon its imperial remains, Efraim and Inari Karsh argue that the great powers repeatedly bolstered the toppling empire, that the Ottomans played a considerable part in their own demise, and that 'the main impetus for the developments of this momentous period came from the local actors'...All in all, the Karshes make a strong case that 'greed rather than necessity drove the Ottoman Empire into the First World War.' -- Charles M. Stang Boston Book Review In a tour de force that offers a profoundly new understanding of a key issue in modern Middle Eastern history, Efraim and Inari Karsh review the relations between Europe and the Ottoman empire in the final century-and-a-half of the latter's existence, and in the process nearly reverse the standard historical interpretation...Drawing on a wide range of original sources, and writing in a clearly organized fashion and in fast-paced prose, the Karshes make a very compelling case for their revisionist position, establishing it point by point and in elegant detail...In all, I can hardly remember last reading so important and daring a reinterpretation of Middle Eastern history, or one so laden with implications. -- Daniel Pipes Commentary According to most accounts, the British sold dreams of Arab unity and sovereignty down the river with the Sykes-Picot Agreement. But in their revisionist history The Empires of the Sand, Efraim Karsh and Inari Karsh argue that this tale of betrayal and Western culpability is itself a mirage...Efraim and Inari Karsh will not escape the cloud of controversy that surrounds them with this new history...Whatever the historical record yields on [their] points, one thing is clear: Pan-Arabism, despite its decline as an active political agenda in the region, remains a live wire. Karsh and Karsh, with their blunt contention that the allies 'generously rewarded' the Hashemites 'in the form of vast territories several times the size of the British Isles,' are likely to spark a maelstrom of debate. -- Anna Secor Lingua Franca A complex and challenging revision of Middle Eastern political history. -- Anthony Sattin Sunday Times This is a fascinating book. -- Geoffrey Wheatcroft Sunday Telegraph In this striking reinterpretation of the modern history of the Middle East, the authors discard the traditional view of Middle Eastern rulers and peoples as passive, near helpless victims of Western imperialist machinations. Rather, they convincingly portray both Ottoman and Arab leaders as active players in the game of power politics...The authors have superbly integrated an interesting cast of characters with broad historical forces. The result is an original and provocative reexamination of the recent history of this vital region. -- Jay Freeman Booklist The authors assault the prevailing wisdom that the decline of the [Ottoman Empire] was inevitable; they claim, rather, that it resulted from a series of poor choices made by its leaders. This approach is both provocative and productive, as the authors, relying on an impressive array of archival and secondary sources, demonstrate how the Ottoman leaders sealed their own fate--their decision to play cat-and-mouse with both sides during WWI was only the final error in a series of blunders. Publishers Weekly [The Karshes'] ambitious aim in Empires of the Sand is threefold. Firstly, they want to show that the Ottomans, even in decline, were far from helpless, and used their diplomatic wiles with some success in a rearguard action...Secondly, the authors maintain that after the First World War, the boundaries of the new nation states were determined not by popular demand of the inhabitants, but by the ambitions of the local potentates. Finally, the Karshes blame Ottoman imperialism itself for its downfall, and discount the effects of the spread of European nationalist doctrines...The Karshes make their case well, and their analysis of the events leading to Turkey's entry into the war is thorough and convincing...Empires of the Sand is an excellent and stimulating work that deserves a readership beyond the world of the professional historian. The Karshes have suggested interesting answers to hard questions, and are worthy of thanks. -- Ralph Ameian The Jerusalem Post 20000825 The chief goal of the authors of Empires of the Sand is to explain the volatility of the twentieth-century Middle East in terms of its origins in the nineteenth century In seeking to do so, they have presented a carefully-researched and well-written work. -- William Ochsenwald MESA Bulletin

Product Description

Empires of the Sand offers a bold and comprehensive reinterpretation of the struggle for mastery in the Middle East during the long nineteenth century. Backed by a wealth of archival sources, the authors refute the standard belief that Europe was responsible for the destruction of the Ottoman Empire and the region's political unity. Instead, they argue that the main impetus for the developments of this momentous period came from the local actors. Efraim Karsh and Inari Karsh see not a "clash of civilizations" but a pattern of pragmatic cooperation and conflict between the Middle East and the West during the past two centuries. Such a vision affords daringly new ways of viewing the Middle East's past as well as its volatile present.

Inside This Book (Learn More)
Explore More
Concordance
Browse Sample Pages
Front Cover | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index | Back Cover
Search inside this book:

Tags Customers Associate with This Product

 (What's this?)
Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
 

Your tags: Add your first tag
 

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?


Customer Reviews

4 star
0
3 star
0
2 star
0
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
23 of 32 people found the following review helpful
By A Customer
Format:Paperback
Excellent! Empires of the Sand by Efraim and Inari Karsh should cause massive upheaval in academia.

For many years interpretations of the history of the modern Middle East has been driven by Arabists, seeking to demonstrate that European powers carved up the region following the demise of the Ottoman Empire to suit their imperialist ambitions. Not so! In the deeply researched book, the Karshes show that the shape of the modern Middle East was as much down to local players, as to European powers.

It blows the myth of an "Arab Nation".

Comment | 
Was this review helpful to you?
2 of 4 people found the following review helpful
Format:Paperback
To quote the eminent scholar of Islam and the Middle East, Daniel Pipes:

"In a tour de force that offers a pro-foundly new understanding of a key issue in modern Middle Eastern history, Efraim and Inari Karsh review the relations between Europe and the Ottoman empire in the final century-and-a-half of the latter's existence, and in the process nearly reverse the standard historical interpretation. According to that interpretation, from about the time of the French Revolution until World War I, a dynamic, arrogant, imperial Europe imposed its will on a static, humiliated, supine East. This framework is common to nearly every lead-ing historian, almost regardless of era or political disposition."

Step by evidential step, this book shows how Arabs were actively involved in shaping the course of the region; how the Ottoman's weren't lured into WWI by Germany, but that the Ottoman ruler recklessly risked the future of his empire in the hope of war-time glory; how the Pan-Arab ideal wasn't destroyed by the British, but by the entrenched fractiousness of Arab-Muslim culture (as if anyone needed proof of that); and perhaps the most infamous of Arab grievances against the West, the Sykes-Picot agreement, redrawing the boundaries of the Middle East. Sykes is shown to have prevented (rather than caused) great(er) Arab splintering.

To quote Pipes again:

"On a wide range of other issues, too, this wall-to-wall revisionist account upends the conventional narrative. It establishes that Ottoman (and not Russian) aggressiveness caused the Turks to lose control of the Balkans; that Great Britain found itself ruling Egypt more on account of Ottoman mistakes than out of its own imperial desires; that the Arab Revolt of World War I was inspired less by nationalist sentiments or other "lofty ideals" than by "the glitter of British gold." More broadly, the Karshes also turn around the usual argument for British duplicity in World War I, pinning this charge instead on the Arabs. Arab leaders, they demonstrate, made fraudulent claims about the extent of their own political authority, gave empty promises of military action, and bargained continuously with the Central Powers with an eye to double-crossing the British."

"Arab Middle Easterners have long sought comfort in the notion of their victimization at the hands of the perfidious, conspiratorial West. By coming instead to accept that they themselves largely created their own destiny and made their own history in the 20th century, they might persuade themselves they can do the same in the 21st - only this time by throwing off their habitual sense of grievance, reigning in their autocratic rulers, reforming their moribund economies, and overcoming their radical ideologies."
Comment | 
Was this review helpful to you?
6 of 18 people found the following review helpful
Format:Paperback
Here is part of a review of this book by Anthony B. Toth (DPhil, Oxford):

"This is a polemical book whose authors have extended the intemperate and unbalanced rhetoric customarily employed by dogmatic partisans of the Arab-Israeli conflict to the normally sedate and measured arena of nineteenth- and early twentieth-century Ottoman history."

Of Efraim Karsh, the principal author of 'Empires of the Sand', Yezid Sayigh (Professor of Middle East Studies in the Department of War Studies at King's College London) has written in his review of the book:

"He is simply not what he makes himself out to be, a trained historian (nor political/social scientist)."

In the same review Sayigh encorouges, "robust responses [that] make sure that any self-respecting scholar will be too embarrassed to even try to incorporate the Karsh books in his/her teaching or research because they can't pretend they didn't know how flimsy their foundations are."

Richard Bulliet, Professor of History at the Middle East Institute of Columbia University, in his review of 'Empires of the Sand' describes it as, "a tendentious and unreliable piece of scholarship that should have been vetted more thoroughly by the publisher."
Was this review helpful to you?
Search Customer Reviews
Only search this product's reviews

Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 


Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
Search all Amazon discussions
   
Related forums


Listmania!


Look for similar items by category


Look for similar items by subject


Feedback


Amazon.co.uk Privacy Statement Amazon.co.uk Delivery Information Amazon.co.uk Returns & Exchanges