£17.16
  • RRP: £18.95
  • You Save: £1.79 (9%)
FREE Delivery in the UK.
Only 1 left in stock (more on the way).
Dispatched from and sold by Amazon.
Gift-wrap available.
Quantity:1
Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See all 2 images

Empire to Commonwealth: Consequences of Monotheism in Late Antiquity Paperback – 19 Dec 1994


See all 2 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
Paperback
"Please retry"
£17.16
£10.80 £10.87

Trade In Promotion



Free One-Day Delivery for six months with Amazon Student


Product details

  • Paperback: 226 pages
  • Publisher: Princeton University Press; New Ed edition (19 Dec 1994)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0691015457
  • ISBN-13: 978-0691015453
  • Product Dimensions: 15.6 x 1.3 x 23.4 cm
  • Average Customer Review: 5.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (2 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 1,153,873 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
  • See Complete Table of Contents

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, and more.

Product Description

Review

"An intelligent essay. . . . [It] should open new cooperation between scholars of late antiquity and early Christianity, and scholars of early Islam."--Choice



"A tight, powerful volume that, among other things, makes some fairly revolutionary comparisons between the Islamic empire and Rome."--The Voice Literary Supplement



"Fowden offers much that is new, interesting, and certainly correct in a manner that is generally appealing. The interaction of different cultures in the Ancient Near East is currently a popular area of research. Fowden has offered a valuable contribution to this field."--John Vanderspoel, Bryn Mawr Classical Review



"This is a short book on a big subject: it is nothing less than an essay in large-scale historical interpretation. . . . a courageous and stimulating book. . . ."--R. A. Markus, Journal of Roman Studies


What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?

Customer Reviews

5.0 out of 5 stars
5 star
2
4 star
0
3 star
0
2 star
0
1 star
0
See both customer reviews
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

By A Customer on 30 April 1997
Format: Paperback
Styles in historiography come and go. For the classical Greek historians, history was
partly the clever strategies of great generals, partly the well-cadenced speeches that
should have been made, some descriptions of strange cultures, some geography. For the
medieval chroniclers, history was melodrama: great battles, duels between heroes,
treacherous murders. In the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, the Enlightenment,
history was the progressive improvement of forms of government. For a while in the
1980s, history was a counterpoint between the psychology of the Chosen Figure and a
description of his social milieu. Later came the history of attitudes of women to
housework and the detailed history of underwear (no, I'm not kidding).
Ideas about
the forces controlling history also change. Caesar was certain that Roman military
strategy and tactics brought about the conquest of Gaul. Josephus probably really
believed what he repeatedly wrote, that God determines the details of history as reward
and punishment for people's actions. Most readers today probably believe that history is
determined by material facts, mainly economic facts. Probably this is another aspect of
our Enlightenment heritage.
Garth Fowden has returned to two older ideas, that a history book should have a thesis, and that beliefs
have a powerful influence on history. In Empire to Commonwealth, his main thesis is
that universalist, monotheistic religions helped bring about world conquest in late
antiquity, and that their opposite had the opposite effect. Who are the monotheistic
universalists? For example, the Byzantine Christians and the Muslims. Who are not?
The Achaemenids, the particularist Jews.
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
3 of 4 people found the following review helpful By A Customer on 30 April 1997
Format: Hardcover
Styles in historiography come and go. For the classical Greek historians, history was
partly the clever strategies of great generals, partly the well-cadenced speeches that
should have been made, some descriptions of strange cultures, some geography. For the
medieval chroniclers, history was melodrama: great battles, duels between heroes,
treacherous murders. In the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, the Enlightenment,
history was the progressive improvement of forms of government. For a while in the
1980s, history was a counterpoint between the psychology of the Chosen Figure and a
description of his social milieu. Later came the history of attitudes of women to
housework and the detailed history of underwear (no, I'm not kidding).
Ideas about
the forces controlling history also change. Caesar was certain that Roman military
strategy and tactics brought about the conquest of Gaul. Josephus probably really
believed what he repeatedly wrote, that God determines the details of history as reward
and punishment for people's actions. Most readers today probably believe that history is
determined by material facts, mainly economic facts. Probably this is another aspect of
our Enlightenment heritage.
Garth Fowden has returned to two older ideas, that a history book should have a thesis, and that beliefs
have a powerful influence on history. In Empire to Commonwealth, his main thesis is
that universalist, monotheistic religions helped bring about world conquest in late
antiquity, and that their opposite had the opposite effect. Who are the monotheistic
universalists? For example, the Byzantine Christians and the Muslims. Who are not?
The Achaemenids, the particularist Jews.
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)

Amazon.com: 2 reviews
16 of 17 people found the following review helpful
Entertaining history with a thesis. 30 April 1997
By A Customer - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Hardcover
Styles in historiography come and go. For the classical Greek historians, history was
partly the clever strategies of great generals, partly the well-cadenced speeches that
should have been made, some descriptions of strange cultures, some geography. For the
medieval chroniclers, history was melodrama: great battles, duels between heroes,
treacherous murders. In the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, the Enlightenment,
history was the progressive improvement of forms of government. For a while in the
1980s, history was a counterpoint between the psychology of the Chosen Figure and a
description of his social milieu. Later came the history of attitudes of women to
housework and the detailed history of underwear (no, I'm not kidding).
Ideas about
the forces controlling history also change. Caesar was certain that Roman military
strategy and tactics brought about the conquest of Gaul. Josephus probably really
believed what he repeatedly wrote, that God determines the details of history as reward
and punishment for people's actions. Most readers today probably believe that history is
determined by material facts, mainly economic facts. Probably this is another aspect of
our Enlightenment heritage.
Garth Fowden has returned to two older ideas, that a history book should have a thesis, and that beliefs
have a powerful influence on history. In Empire to Commonwealth, his main thesis is
that universalist, monotheistic religions helped bring about world conquest in late
antiquity, and that their opposite had the opposite effect. Who are the monotheistic
universalists? For example, the Byzantine Christians and the Muslims. Who are not?
The Achaemenids, the particularist Jews.
On the way, he discusses several other
interesting questions in the history of ideas. The question of whether only the saintly are
the chosen of God, or whether the highest levels of religion are open even to sinners by
virtue of their chosen position, was an important question in early Christianity. Mr.
Fowden could have pointed out that the Jews were arguing the same question at about
the same time (see Berachot 28a, 34a).
Mr. Fowden has great knowledge of cultures
which even people well educated in the Western tradition know little about, e. g., the
ancient Iranian religions and the monophysite Christianity of medieval Ethiopia. As in all
good histories, there are also diversions along the way, discussions of the moral one-upmanship among the Romans and Iranians in respecting the chastity of each other's
harems, and of the amazemant caused by a royal progress of the Black Christian king of
Aksum among the oppressed Christians of neighboring lands. And who but Mr. Fowden
knows about the synod of monophysite Christians called in 1965 by the Emperor of
Ethiopia and the Metropolitan of Aksum.
Mr. Fowden knows how to write. The
history of late antiquity, especially outside of Europe and Asia Minor, is a weak spot in
the education of most of us. It's also pleasant to return to the historiography of ideas
sometimes. The book is also well printed and well bound, and includes high-quality
photographs of both artistic and historical significance. I'm glad I read it, and hope to
read it again
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful
Entertaining history with a thesis. 30 April 1997
By A Customer - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Paperback
Styles in historiography come and go. For the classical Greek historians, history was
partly the clever strategies of great generals, partly the well-cadenced speeches that
should have been made, some descriptions of strange cultures, some geography. For the
medieval chroniclers, history was melodrama: great battles, duels between heroes,
treacherous murders. In the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, the Enlightenment,
history was the progressive improvement of forms of government. For a while in the
1980s, history was a counterpoint between the psychology of the Chosen Figure and a
description of his social milieu. Later came the history of attitudes of women to
housework and the detailed history of underwear (no, I'm not kidding).
Ideas about
the forces controlling history also change. Caesar was certain that Roman military
strategy and tactics brought about the conquest of Gaul. Josephus probably really
believed what he repeatedly wrote, that God determines the details of history as reward
and punishment for people's actions. Most readers today probably believe that history is
determined by material facts, mainly economic facts. Probably this is another aspect of
our Enlightenment heritage.
Garth Fowden has returned to two older ideas, that a history book should have a thesis, and that beliefs
have a powerful influence on history. In Empire to Commonwealth, his main thesis is
that universalist, monotheistic religions helped bring about world conquest in late
antiquity, and that their opposite had the opposite effect. Who are the monotheistic
universalists? For example, the Byzantine Christians and the Muslims. Who are not?
The Achaemenids, the particularist Jews.
On the way, he discusses several other
interesting questions in the history of ideas. The question of whether only the saintly are
the chosen of God, or whether the highest levels of religion are open even to sinners by
virtue of their chosen position, was an important question in early Christianity. Mr.
Fowden could have pointed out that the Jews were arguing the same question at about
the same time (see Berachot 28a, 34a).
Mr. Fowden has great knowledge of cultures
which even people well educated in the Western tradition know little about, e. g., the
ancient Iranian religions and the monophysite Christianity of medieval Ethiopia. As in all
good histories, there are also diversions along the way, discussions of the moral one-upmanship among the Romans and Iranians in respecting the chastity of each other's
harems, and of the amazemant caused by a royal progress of the Black Christian king of
Aksum among the oppressed Christians of neighboring lands. And who but Mr. Fowden
knows about the synod of monophysite Christians called in 1965 by the Emperor of
Ethiopia and the Metropolitan of Aksum.
Mr. Fowden knows how to write. The
history of late antiquity, especially outside of Europe and Asia Minor, is a weak spot in
the education of most of us. It's also pleasant to return to the historiography of ideas
sometimes. I haven't seen the paperback, but the hard-cover edition includes high-quality
photographs of both artistic and historical significance. I'm glad I read the book, and hope to
read it again
Were these reviews helpful? Let us know


Feedback